JEWISH INFLUENCE IN THE MASS MEDIA

25 Nov

JEWISH INFLUENCE IN THE MASS MEDIA

 
In 1985 Laurence Tisch, Chairman of the Board of New York University, former President of the Greater New York United Jewish Appeal, an active supporter of Israel, and a man of many other roles, started buying stock in the CBS television network through his company, the Loews Corporation. The Tisch family, worth an estimated 4 billion dollars, has major interests in hotels, an insurance company, Bulova, movie theatres, and Loliards, the nation’s fourth largest tobacco company (Kent, Newport, True cigarettes). Brother Andrew Tisch has served as a Vice-President for the UJA-Federation, and as a member of the United Jewish Appeal national youth leadership cabinet, the American Jewish Committee, and the American Israel Political Action Committee, among other Jewish organizations. By September of 1986 Tisch’s company owned 25% of the stock of CBS and he became the company’s president. And Tisch — now the most powerful man at CBS — had strong feelings about television, Jews, and Israel. The CBS news department began to live in fear of being compromised by their boss — overtly, or, more likely, by intimidation towards self-censorship — concerning these issues. “There have been rumors in New York for years,” says J. J. Goldberg, “that Tisch took over CBS in 1986 at least partly out of a desire to do something about media bias against Israel.” [GOLDBERG, p. 297]
     
The powerful President of a major American television network dare not publicize his own active bias in favor of another country, of course. That would look bad, going against the grain of the democratic traditions, free speech, and a presumed “fair” mass media. And if it ever became clear that the CBS news department was in danger of turning into an ad agency for Israel, the resulting controversy would probably defeat Tisch’s purpose in helping them.  But word leaked out, that CBS news under Laurence Tisch lived in fear of being ethically compromised.
 
During the Palestinian Intifada (the stone-throwing revolt by Palestinian Arabs against Israeli military rule), a birthday party was held by Jewish TV personality Barbara Walters and her husband Merv Adelson for Jewish Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan. Other invited Jewish guests included former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and U.S. News and World Report publisher, Mortimer Zuckerman.
 
According to Roone Arledge, the President of ABC News, who was also a guest at the party, a long and heated debate arose about television’s depiction of the Israeli military’s attempts to crush Arab rioting. CBS President Tisch argued that TV should effectively censor reports on what was happening, that “television ought to be banned in the occupied territories “because it portrayed Israeli soldiers in a bad light. Kissinger had argued the same a few weeks earlier, publicly concerned that “TV cameras incited riots and tarnished Israel’s reputation.”  Arledge vehemently argued that the media’s ethical stand should be to be present and report whatever was happening, when and wherever possible.
 
Barbara Walters and Mortimer Zuckerman covered for Tisch and they all denied that he took such an irresponsibly biased, and disturbing, position.  According to (Jewish) reporter Ken Auletta, however, eight other people at the party testified  — five to him personally — that Tisch did.  Jewish guests at the party, led by Tisch, also attacked Arledge’s ABC anchorman (who was not present) Peter Jennings, for being — as they saw it — too “anti-Israel. “Several guests,” writes Auletta, “came away deeply distressed by Tisch’s behavior. What disturbed them was that the President of CBS seemed to say that the perceived interests of Israel took precedence over the interests of CBS News. Tisch’s reflex, they felt, was to defend Israel, not his network; he was blaming Jennings and the press for reporting Israel’s excesses, not Israel committing them. ” [AULETTA p. 488-490]
 
Tisch’s strong emotions about Israel were exhibited in other ways. After CBS’s popular news program, 60 Minutes, did a story about the Jewish lobbying group AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee), Tisch was furious with his employees because the program made Jews, to his eyes, look too powerful. (Curiously, long-time CBS reporter, David Schoenburn, notes that both 60 Minutes producer Don Hewitt, and 60 Minutes reporter, Mike Wallace (both Jewish), “were personal friends of Larry Tisch.” [SCHOENBURN, p. 6])  Tisch reportedly even called the reporter of the AIPAC story, Wallace, a self-hating Jew. Tom Wyman, the non-Jewish CEO of CBS, joined in the fray, at another party. He was reported by Newsweek to have complained “that Tisch’s enthusiasm for ‘pro-Israel’ causes and charities might compromise the independent reporting of CBS news.”  [AULETTA, p. 164] 
 
This attitude by powerful Jewish media figures reflects a certain tradition, and recalls the case in the late 1940s of Adolph Schwimmer who “became the Jewish state’s prime [arms] smuggler in America.” Among his close contacts was Herman “Hank” Greenspun, the publisher of the Las Vegas Sun. Greenspun once noted that he was a Zionist “before I could even identify a picture of George Washington.” [RAVIV, p. 40] During Israel’s “War of Independence” in 1948, Greenspun traveled to “Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, and Panama, where he organized false documents, bank guarantees, and arms shipments to Israel.” [RAVIV, p. 41] “Hank Greenspun,” notes Alex Pelle,
 
      “embarked on an incredible odyssey, plundering a naval depot in
      Hawaii, seizing a private yacht at gunpoint near Wilmington, California,
      and posing in Mexico as a confidential agent of Generalissimo Chiang
      Kai-shek’s government. A single driving purpose generated over the
      span of seven months all those seemingly unrelated events: to fill the
      holds of a ship … with six thousand tons of contraband rifles, machine
      guns, howitzers, cannons, and ammunition, destined for the port of
      Haifa and Israel’s beleaguered Jews. In so doing, Hank Greenspun
      had violated the United States’ Neutrality Act, the Export Control
      Law, and Presidential Proclamation 2776.” Thanks to Jewish lobbying
      pressure, Greenspun was pardoned by President John F. Kennedy
      in 1961. [GREENSPUN, H., 1966, p. ix]
 
                  *********************************************
 
In 1989 the Time Inc. corporate media giant merged with Warner Communications to become Time-Warner Communications, the largest media organization at the time in the world. (Sigmund Warburg, an internationally renowned Jewish banker who represented the London Daily Mirror Group, then the largest newspaper company on earth, had years earlier tried to buy Time, Inc., to no avail). [CLURMAN, p. 31] When the dust had settled this time, Steve Ross, a Jewish entrepreneur who started out working for a funeral home, sat astride the monstrous merger, the highest paid corporate executive in America. His $39.1 million in 1990 as co-CEO, sole chairman and chief decision-maker, was 1,363 per cent above the corporate average. [CLURMAN p. 304] The merger, notes Richard Clurman, “was the creation of the biggest media empire, the corporate interfaith marriage of the sixty-seven-year-old Time Inc., a WASPy blue-chip American institution, for years the largest combined magazine and book publisher on earth, to Steven J. Ross’s poker-chip Warner Communications, Inc., the pop entertainment conglomerate whose movies and sounds of music ricochet around the world.” The Time Inc. stable included such venerable publishing mainstays as Time, Life, Fortune, Sports Illustrated, People, Money, Time-Life Books, the Little-Brown publishing house, HBO (long time chief: Michael Fuchs), the Book of the Month Club, and television stations. It even held a 20.5% share in the ownership of Turner Broadcasting  (of CNN fame) and 10.5% voting power in it. Warner contributed the likes of Lorimar Television, Atco-East/West Records, Atlantic Recording, Quincy Jones Entertainment, Elektra Communications, DC Comics, as well as the Batman movie, Rod Stewart, Madonna, Bugs Bunny, and the rest of its vast movie-music empire. (By 1997 Time-Warner even owned the rights to the photographs, other images, and words of Martin Luther King, Jr.) In his earlier years, Ross had revitalized Warner-Seven Arts by buying cable-TV monopolies, as well as major interests in the Pittsburgh Pirates baseball team, Ralph Lauren perfume and cosmetics, and other investments. A month after the Time-Warner merger, federal bank regulators instituted new restrictions to hinder such “highly leveraged transactions.” [CLURMAN, p. 33]
 
Steve Ross (whose father changed his surname from Rechnitz, and whose former stepfather, William Paley, for decades controlled CBS) was widely known as a man of dubious ethics and caused consternation among many journalists at Time that such a man was about to take them all over.  He has been an “unindicted co-conspirator” in a 1979 United States Justice Department case investing underworld money laundering operation in suburban New York City. His “top lieutenant” at Warners took the fall and admitted guilt; likewise, Warners’ assistant treasurer (who handled Ross’s personal accounts) was also convicted of fraud and perjury. [CLURMAN, p. 29]  In earlier years Ross had merged his funeral home operation with a parking lot company, Kinney National Service, which had its own “unsavory reputation.” “There were rumors that Kinney was mobbed up [i.e., tainted by organized crime],” notes Fred Goodman, “Caesar Kinney, Kinney’s executive vice president and original owner of Kinney’s parking lot business, was the son of Emmanuel Kinney, a well-known New Jersey gambler.” [GOODMAN, p. 137-138] (In 1969 Ross and the Kinney company bought Warner-Seven Arts from Elliott Hyman for $400 million. [Sam Kinney had been head of production; Benny Kalmensan was the number two man.] For his part, Hyman’s earlier company was Associated Artists Productions, which had purchased the entire pre-1948 Warners film library in 1956. Associated Artists’ chairman was Louis Chesler, who, notes Andrew Yule, was a man “with established ties to Mafia boss Meyer Lansky. Nor was this AA’s only shady connection. Its vice-president, Morris ‘Mac’ Schwebel, would later be convicted of criminal activity.” [YULE, p. 176])
 
The 1989 merger of the two super companies, Time and Warner, also raised issues of conflict of interest. How could Time, Fortune, and other magazines now be expected to give honest reviews and evaluations of Warners movies, records, and other enterprises? Richard Clurman notes the fact, for instance, that an August 1991 Fortune article called “The Deal Decade: Verdict of the 80s” … “sharply criticized leveraged excesses deal by deal, with the names and numbers of the dealmakers but it skipped one of the highest profiles of them all, the Time-Warners merger.” [CLURMAN, p. 305]
 
Among the central negotiators in the mega-merger was the Jewish Vice-President of Time, Inc., Jerry Levin, “chief tactician for Time‘s merger with Warner,” and Ed Aboodi, an Israeli-born “financial consultant” for Warners. Aboodi’s reputation, says Clurman is that of a “shadowy mystery man … [He] was an invisible mystery man to the world outside Warners until the Time-Warner deal.” Investigative reporter Richard Clurman found no listing in any telephone directory for his Alpine Capital Company, which is housed in the Time-Warner building. “Aboodi says he has no telephone listing for Alpine because ‘people know me and they know how to find me. I’ve never thought about it.” [CLURMAN, p. 165] “Levin and Aboodi,” says Clurman, “a Delphic-like oracle and a Talmudic-like exegetist, [are] quite a combination for an intricate modern business deal. Levin even spoke of the ‘thaumaturgic (i.e., mystical) significance’ of some of their meetings.” [CLURMAN, p. 166]  “While his peers have been unabashedly striving to scale the corporate ladder to attain the personal perquisite of power and wealth,” notes Connie Bruck, “Levin has long maintained that he has been compelled by something far less mundane, almost mystical: a sense of obligation to bring to fruition the ‘manifest destiny’ of Time, Inc. and, now, Time Warner.” [BRUCK, p. 55] Ultimately, the Chief Financial Officer, the General Counsel, and Secretary of the Board for the new company were all to come from Warners. [CLURMAN, p. 197-198] The new company committed up to $150 million to a fund managed by Aboodi’s Alpine Capital company, as well as providing him his $8 million advisory fee.
 
By 1991 Time-Warner announced a deal with the largest of Japanese venture capital trading firms, C. Itoh, and Toshiba; this translated into a Japanese investment of another billion dollars. The massive mega-company then hired former Federal Communications Commission chairman Dennis R. Patrick and “two corporate ‘image makers’ who had worked at the White House” to help maneuver governmental regulatory policies. Time-Warner “also had on retainer an elegant pack of the most connected Washington lobbyists.” [CLURMAN, p. 338] The new Time-Warner soon also acquired Sunset magazine, Lane Publishing, and 50% interest in Six Flags Amusement Parks.
 
Time-Warner,” wrote Richard Clurman in his book about the subject in 1992, “is a combination whose creations (magazines, books, movies, music, cable TV, and programming) are now exposed to the minds and emotions of more people than those of any other commercial enterprise on earth …  [CLURMAN, p. 33] [Time-Warner executives] frequently predicted that one day ‘5 or 6 media companies would dominate the world.'” [CLURMAN, p. 338]
 
After the big merger, ruefully notes Clurman, for twenty years a journalist and executive at Time, Inc., “in a bicoastal, cross-cultural anointing, Time‘s house organ  [had a column on new executive titles] under the heading ‘Honorable Menschen”  [a Yiddish pun]. Within the same two weeks, Nick Nicholas [the co-chairman of Time-Warner, eventually dumped from that position], was given a American-Jewish Committee Human Relations Award in Los Angeles and Steve Ross was named Man of the Year by the Entertainment Division of the UJA [United Jewish Appeal] in New York.” [CLURMAN, p. 314] (Steve Ross was “one of the role models” for Oskar Schindler in Stephen Spielberg’s film Schindler’s List. “To prepare [actor Liam Neeson] for the part, the director reportedly showed pictures of Ross … a wheeler-dealer of legendary proficiency.” [KELLMAN, p. 10] Schindler was also likened to another Jewish media mogul, Michael Ovitz, “on top of the mountain pulling strings in every fiefdom down below.” [KELLMAN, p. 10]
 
When Steve Ross subsequently died of cancer, Gerald Levin replaced him as head of Time-Warner after a struggle for power, successfully firing presumed heir, Nick Nicholas. (Levin’s son, Lee, is studying to be a rabbi at the Jewish Theological Seminary. [BOXER, T., 5-26-01] Soon Norman Pearlstine, formerly the head of the Wall Street Journal and Jewish, was installed as editor of Timemagazine.
 
More recently, in 1995, Disney’s Jewish chairman Michael Eisner announced the $19 billion acquisition of Capital Cities-ABC to create an even larger corporate media monolith, relegating massive Time-Warner to second size. Disney-ABC controls, aside from the obvious, everything from the Anaheim Angels baseball team and the Mighty Ducks hockey team to Miramax Films (co-chaired by the Jewish Weinstein brothers, Harvey and Bob) and the ESPN sports network (Jewish president and CEO, Steven Bornstein).  Disney also owned Fairchild Publications which included fashion magazine Jane, W, Supermarket News, Women’s Wear Daily, Chilton Books, Los Angeles Magazine, and numerous newspapers and TV stations. Not to be out-fattened, Gerald Levin at the heal of Time-Warner soon absorbed Ted Turner’s media empire, Turner Broadcasting, including CNN.  [BRUCK, p. 58] Turner was relegated to second in command at Time-Warner. Head of the Turner Broadcasting System division in 1999? Brad Siegel. The new chief of CNN in 2001? Also Jewish: Walter Isaacson, formerly Time Inc.’s editorial director.And this is how a Jewish ethnic online magazine described Brad Turrell, number 12 in its 2001 “Fifty Most Influential Jews in America”:

     “While Turrell was the head of communications for the WB television network, he
     began a religious odyssey that transformed he and his family into observant
     Jews. Well, the Lord works in mysterious ways. In April, he was promoted
     to the top communication slot for all of Turner Broadcasting which includes TNT,
     TBS Superstation, the WB Network, Cartoon Network, Turner Classic Movies,
     Turner South and Boomerang, the CNN News Group Networks, which includes
     CNN/U.S., CNN Headline News, CNNfn, Accent Health, CNN Airport Network,
     College Television Network (CTN), CNN Radio Network, CNN.com, CNNfn.com,
     CNNfyi.com and MyCNN.com and Nascar.com. With all the recent claims [by
     Jewish lobbying organizations] of CNN‘s alleged media bias against Israel, it will
      be interesting to see how Turrell handles the position.” [JEWSWEEK, 2001]

The aforementioned Weinstein brothers “run a company [Miramax] that released more movies than any other in the U.S. in the year 2000 and had the eighth-largest box-office receipts.” “After Disney paid $60 million for Miramax in 1993,” notes New York Magazine, “[Harvey] Weinstein spent his time buying his way to the Oscar platform and getting in touch with his inner thug by screwing over far more delicate artistic sorts … But all the legendary bad behavior [by him] cannot obscure an objective fact: Harvey Weinstein is a cultural good. Pulp Fiction, Sex, Lies, and Videotape, and Shakespeare in Love have all become a part of the national narrative, framing the way people dance, talk, and fight … [Weinstein] is a pushcart peddler who is more than happy to put his thumb on the scale when the old woman is buying meat,’ says [fellow Jewish] producer Saul Zaentz. ‘He has not qualms about it … ‘People say, ‘Are you tough?’ I say: ‘Facing [Jewish Hollywood moguls] Barry Diller, Michael Eisner, Jeffrey Katzenberg, David Geffen, you know, Stephen Spielberg … Why the hell would you have to be tough in this industry to survive? Those guys are just a walk in the park?'” [CARR, D., 12-03-01]

(Among Weinstein’s most recent projects — like so many Jewish moguls — is one with a Holocaust theme (this one based on a piece of fiction by Jewish novelist Leon Uris, Mita 18.) “‘I’m preparing to direct a movie about the Warsaw Ghetto. About Jews kiling fucking Germans in great numbers,’ he says with enthusiasm.”) [CARR, D., 12-03-01]

“It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture,” wrote Jewish author, film critic, and talk show host Michael Medved in 1996,
 
      “Any list of the most influential production executives at each of
      the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizable
      Jewish names.” [MEDVED, p. 1] … Consider the well-publicized
      reshuffling that recently rocked the Walt Disney Company, involving
      some of the mightiest and most highly paid media moguls. In this game
      of corporate musical chairs, Disney C.E.O. and Chairman of the Board,
      Michael Eisner lost the services of his movie production chief, Jeffrey
      Katzenberg, who became part of the much-heralded new “dream team” 
      (formally incorporated as DreamWorks SKG) with Steven Spielberg
      and David Geffen. {[In 1990 Forbes magazine called Geffen — a former
      agent and record producer — the richest man in Hollywood.” [KOTKIN,
      p. 62] The first project out of DreamWorks was also by a Jewish
      producer, Gary Goldberg, whose earlier “gentle, semi-autobiographical
      look at a middle-class Jewish family” lasted 35 episodes in 1991-92 on
      CBS [CEROWE, p. F1]] Meanwhile, Eisner created a new position at
      Disney for his omnipotent super agent Michael Ovitz and gave broader
      responsibilities to his fair-haired boy, Joe Roth, former head of 20th
      Century Fox … These headlines underscored the ironic fact that the
      famous Disney organization, founded by a gentile Midwestern who
      allegedly harbored anti-Semitic attitudes now features Jewish personnel
      in nearly all its most powerful positions.”  [MEDVED, p. 37]
 
Among these personnel is also Michael Lynton, appointed to be the head of Disney’s movie division in 1994. At the very start of Eisner’s tenure at Disney, Katzenberg headed the Disney studios, fellow Jew Richard Frank headed television, and David Hoberman was the chief at the film division. [SCHWEIZER/SCHWEIZER, p. 5] Joseph Shapiro became a Disney Senior Vice President in the 1990s. Steven Bornstein is (2001) chairman of Walt Disney Internet Group, heading Disney’s commercial explorations of the world wide web. Even the president of the Disney-founded California Institute of the Arts is Jewish, Steven Lavine. In earlier years, during Saul Steinberg’s attempt to lead a hostile takeover of the famous WASP firm, some observers were concerned that the “take over battle might be regarded as an attempt by Jews to topple one of the temples of Protestant America.” [TAYLOR, J., p. ix]  At that time, when Walt Disney’s nephew, Roy E. Disney, held the largest individual stake in the company, his lawyer was also Jewish: Stanley Gold. [TAYLOR, J., p. 3]  Gold eventually became  “a financial power through Roy Disney’s Shamrock Holdings and one of the largest foreign investors in Israel.” [TUGEND 10-22-99])

As Carl Hiaasen wrote, in his 1998 volume Team Rodent — How Disney Devours the World:

     “In December 1997 Disney chairman Michael D. Eisner exercised company
      stock options that brought him $565 million in a single swoop. The notion of
      attaching such a sum to one man’s job is both obscene and hilarious on its face,
      yet it’s pointless to debate whether or not Eisner deserves it. He got the dough.
      It happened in the same month that Business Week chose Disney’s board of
      directors as the worst in America. The reason: Many seemed to have been
      handpicked not so much for their business expertise as for their loyalty to the
      autocratic Eisner. Among the company’s directors are his personal architect, his
      personal attorney, the principal of his children’s elementary school, and seven
      current and former Disney executives ‘Fantastic’ is how Eisner has described his
      choices for the board. But critics say it’s a meek and malleable group. That’s
      precisely what was needed to sit still for the ludicrous $75 million platinum parachute
      given to Michael Ovitz [also Jewish] as compensation for fourteen whole months as
      president of the Walt Disney Company.”
[Hiaasen, C., 1998, p. 38-39]

 
In 1997, when Lilian Disney (Walt’s widow) donated $50 million towards building a Los Angeles cultural center called Disney Hall (named in honor of her husband), Variety noted lingering (Jewish) animosity towards him:
 
      “So far [her donation is] the only notable sign of financial support from
      the film industry or its players for the new concert hall in downtown Los
     Angeles … The fact that the hall bears the name of Disney [is] possibly a
     turnoff to other studios.” [JOHNSON, p. 11]
 
“Not everyone was happy with the ‘inevitable’ changes [resulting from the arrival of Eisner and his new management at Disney in the 1980s],” notes Joe Flower, “Letters to the Los Angeles Times, homeland newspaper to the company and the entertainment industry, ran heavily negative, complaining of the compromise in quality in Disney’s Saturday morning cartoons, the ‘commercialism’ of the new management’s projects and the dilution of the Disney name.” [FLOWER, p. 192] In 1985 Disney announced that pop star Madonna would star in one of its films (she eventually didn’t) and affiliates of the great bastion of “family entertainment” began to produce R-rated films. The movie Pulp Fiction (produced by a Disney affiliate, Miramax) was decried by some for its graphic and celebratory violence. By 1987, when Disney had a quarterly profit increase of 159%, Chairman Eisner got a $2.6 million year-end bonus while rank-and-file Disney employees found their health insurance deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses doubled. [FLOWER, p. 257]

Jewish publisher Paul Krassner wrote the following, in delight, about what he believed to be massive cultural changes in America with the (symbolic) death of Walt Disney — a tearing down of hypocrisy and illusion. In context here, however, his words ring as an indictment of the Jewish take-over not only at Disney, but throughout American culture where formal “WASP” values of genteel civility have been replaced by brash, vulgar, Freudian, in-your-face Jewish ones:

   “[Walt] Disney’s death occurred a few years after Time magazine’s famous ‘God is Dead’ cover, and it occurred to me that Disney had indeed served as God to that whole stable of imaginary characters who were now mourning in a state of suspended animation. Disney had been THEIR Creator and he had repressed all their baser instincts, but now that he had departed, they could finally shed their cumulative inhibitions and participate together in an unspeakable Roman binge, to signify the crumbling of an empire. I contacted Wally Wood and, without mentioning specific details, I told him my general notion of a memorial orgy at Disneyland. He accepted the assignment and presented me with a magnificently degenerate montage. Pluto was pissing on a portrait of Mickey Mouse, while the real, bedraggled Mickey was shooting up heroin with a hypodermic needle. His nephews were jerking off as they watched Goofy fucking [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 142] Minnie Mouse on a combination bed and cash register. Dumbo was simultaneously flying and shitting on an infuriated Donald Duck. Huey, Dewey, and Louie were peeking at Daisy Duck’s asshole as she watching the Seven Dwarfs groping Snow White. The prince was snatching a peek at Cinderella’s snatch while trying a glass slipper on her foot. The three little pigs were humping each other in a daisy chain. Jiminy Cricket leered as Tinker Bell did a striptease and Pinocchio’s nose got longer … [This] became so popular that I decided to publish it as a poster. The Disney corporation considered a lawsuit but realized The Realist was published on a proverbial shoestring, and, besides, why bother causing themselves further public embarrassment? They took no action on me, and the statute of limitations finally ran out.” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 142]

 
As Disney profits soared and its “family values” reputation corroded, in 1997 the Southern Christian Baptist Convention initiated a boycott of all Disney products, in part because of Disney-ABC‘s homosexual sit-com, “Ellen.” In 1997 too the Catholic League for Religion and Civil Rights, already protesting a Disney-sponsored feature film called “Priest,” successfully lobbied at least seven corporations to pull their ads from a new Disney-ABC series called “Nothing Sacred,” which featured, as some expressed it,  “an inner city priest’s struggles with his religious beliefs.” The offended Catholic organization decried the TV program for containing “slanderous assaults” against the Church.  (Similarly, in 1992, a few Catholic newspapers refused to accept advertising for a novel by Jewish author Erich Segal, Acts of Faith, the story of a love affair between a Catholic seminarian and an Orthodox Jewish woman.) The conservative Focus on the Family organization also instituted its own boycott against any product with a Disney label. In 1995 the well known Disney “family entertainment” company was scandalized when it was revealed that the director, Victor Salvo, of a new Disney movie called “Powder,” was a convicted child molester. In 1999 Disney invited controversy with its film about the life of New York mass murderer David Berkowitz, the “Son of Sam.” Even the killer himself was outraged by the movie. “Let me tell you something,” said Berkowitz from prison, “Walt Disney must be turning over in his grave.” [HARDEN, p. 22]
 
As Rabbi Daniel Lapin notes about the aforementioned Disney movie Priest,
 
     “When it came to Priest, there were few courageous Jewish leaders
     out there who stepped to the defense of Catholics … It was
     appropriate for Jews to join in the denunciation of Priest. After all,
     the head of Disney as well as the heads of its distribution subsidiary,
     Miramax, are Jewish. We may feel that making such an observation
     is in bad taste. If non-Jews make the same observation we no doubt
     will immediately recognize them as anti-Semites. However, this kind
     of intimidation will not stop many Americans from making that
     observation. Neither will it stop them from seeing as insulting that
     the companies just happened to choose Good Friday as the date
     for this film’s national release.” [LAPIN, D., 1999, p. 311]
 
In 1994 Disney faced claims that its Lion King character was pilfered from a 40-year old Japanese story by Tezauka Osamu. In 1990 advocates for the homeless managed to get Disney to stop selling a tramp toy. In 1996 the World Development Movement protested Disney‘s exploitation of toy-makers in Third World countries. In 1997 nearly forty organizations joined the National Hispanic Media Coalition protests against Disney and its ABC network for alleged discrimination in hiring. In 1997, after media embarrassment, Disneyland reinstated a discount program for the disabled it had tried to quietly rescind.  In 1997, too, Disney CEO Michael Eisner (already since 1984 the highest paid executive in the United States at $660 million over 11 years), succeeded in getting a ten-year future “compensation package” for himself that could be worth close to $800 million, a sum attacked at a Disney shareholders meeting by about twenty investor organizations, including the California Public Employees Retirement System.  After a failed 14-month hiring of Eisner’s (Jewish) friend Michael Ovitz to be groomed as the next Disney heir to power, Ovitz was awarded a controversial $128 million severance package. [GRELLEY, Persp, p. B9; FISHER, M, BAPTISTS, p. A1; MATZER, p. D8; HORN, p. 3; BURRESS, p. A1; CHICTRIB, 12-20-90, p1, 8; GUARDIAN, 12-4-96, 1, 19; BURRESS, p. E1; BRAXTON, p. F2; MILLER, p. A1; LIEBERMAN, D, USA, p. B3; FARHI, p. D1, SLATER p. 298, 327; SEGAL, N, p. 5]
 
 (In the 1990s the Disney-ABC conglomerate began buying up and gentrifying Manhattan’s Times Square area. All the low-life adult bookstores and other such merchants were shifted, en masse, to another area. And who was positioned to sell the real estate in the newly designated porno site? “Just about the whole neighborhood,” noted London’s Daily Telegraph, “it turned out, was owned by half-a-dozen old Jewish families.”) [LAURENCE, C., 10-30-95, p. 17]
 
In 1992, the Disney film “Aladdin” came under attack from outraged Arab and Muslim groups. Condemnation starts with its opening song: “Oh, I come from a land / a far away place / where the caravan camels roam. / Where they cut off your ear if they don’t like your face / it’s barbaric, but, hey, it’s home.” [SHAHEEN, J. 12-21-92, p. F3] Professor Jack Shaheen complained again about Disney four years later:
 
      “Nearly one year after Disney bashed Arabs in ‘Aladdin,’ …
       [its] studio executives promised they would in the future consult
       with Arab Americans so as not to repeat the mistakes. Soon after,
       in ‘The Return of Jafar’ (1996), they displayed gobs of hook-nosed
       Arabs referred to in the film as ‘desert skunks.’ That same year, Disney
       continued trouncing Arabs in … ‘In the Army Now’ … In 1995,
       Disney’s Christmas feel-good family film ‘Father of the Bride, Part
       II, writers inserted a foul, rich, Arab-American couple, the Habibs…
       Collectively, Disney‘s relentlessly ruthless images advance suspicion
       and hatred. Although other studios perpetuate injurious clichés … only
       Disney violates Americans of Middle East heritage.” SHAHEEN, J.,
       8-12-96, p. F31]
 
This anti-Arab, anti-Islam tenor, of course, is a recurring theme from Hollywood. In 1998, for instance, a non-Disney film, The Siege, by director Edward Zwick, came under especially heated attack by Arabs and Muslims. From the apologetic side, “Zwick and [Siege producer Lynda] Obst, both Jewish, have said that they intended the 20th Century Fox film to combat racism.” [PFEFFERMAN, N., 9-4-98] The American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee strongly felt it did something else, calling it “insidious, incendiary, and dangerous” for Arabs and Muslims. “There is no doubt,” agreed Montreal Gazette reviewer Bill Brownstein, “… that The Siegedoes incite racial hatred toward Arabs … The image that will linger long after the lights come back on is that of U.S. soldiers herding up every Arab in New York and shunting them off to mini-concentration camps.” [BROWNSTEIN, B., p. A3]In 2000, London’s daily newspaper The Independent noted the new movie Rules of Engagement, directed by William Friedkin and produced by Paramount, whose head of the film division is Sherry Lansing. Friedkin and Lansing are husband and wife — and they are both Jewish:

     “The Arab nations — and the Islamic world in general — have become the new
     stock enemy, a powerful and unreasoning force in True Lies (1994), Executive
     Decision
(1995), GI Jane (1997) and The Siege (1998) — in which Bruce Willis
     rounded up Arab Americans in an attempt to stop a Hezbollah-type terrorist
     group blowing up New York. Even The Insider (1999) — a film about corruption
     in the tobacco industry, for heaven’s sake — tacked on a Syrian prologue in which Al
     Pacino took on a pack of mad-ish mullahs. And Rules of Engagement? This film is
      absolutely off the scale,’ says Hussein Ibish, communications director of the
     American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Commitee, a Washington-based pressure
     group. ‘I’ve never seen anything quite so vile. I felt like I was being physically
     beaten, which is a reaction I’ve never had encountering a work of art. It was
     mind-bogglingly vicious. I’m amazed that a major American entertainment company
     would actually release such a thing.” [SWEET, M., 7-30-00]

In 1999, the Disney company found itself embroiled in yet another controversy, this one political. It had allowed the state of Israel to have an exhibit — the largest — “on display at the new Millennium Village at [Disney World] Complex’s Epcot Center in Florida.” [LOS ANGELES JEWISH TIMES, Aug 27-Sept 2, 99] Muslim and Arab organizations were concerned that Israel would portray Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish state, an assertion at odds with the Muslim and Arab view.
 
Rarely publicly expressed, there may be an angry undercurrent in popular perception about the reshaping of Disney’s public image: a perceived negative Jewish influence in the mass media’s shaping of modern American values, a theme which is not new. “During Hollywood’s pre-second World War Golden Age,” notes J. J. Goldberg,” it was commonly argued that Jews were insensitive and hostile to Christian values and were shaping an American culture that offended the American Christian majority.” [GOLDBERG, p. 284] In later years even Jewish authors could be found who complained about a noticeable shift in media-defined American values. “A distinct majority of [producers and writers in Hollywood] are Jewish,” wrote Jewish critic Ben Stein, “They do not hold criminals responsible for crime but rather place the blame on society.” [PRAGER, p. 63]
 
“There may be something more serious behind these boycotts [against Disney], Lehrer [an Anti-Defamation League official] and others suspect,” says Joel Kotkin, “a revival of the traditional concerns among various groups about ‘Jewish control’ of the means of mass communications. Disney [‘s] … leadership comprises some of the most visible and powerful Jewish figures in the industry.” [KOTKIN, DISNEY, p. 12]
 
In protesting the Disney-ABC TV series “Nothing Sacred’ (which has extremely low ratings, yet was renewed for a second season anyway), the president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, William Donohue, noted in 1997 that
 
        “Perhaps the most aggravating aspect of ‘Nothing Sacred’ is the
        audacity of executive producers David Manson and Richard Kramer,
        to admit that their purpose is to create ‘dialogue among Catholics’ about
        the teachings of the Church. Who ever asked — or appointed — these
        two men, both of whom are Jewish, and both who believe in nothing,
        to foment dialogue in my Church? …. ‘Nothing Sacred’ is political
        propaganda against the Magisterium being waged by producers who
        are outsiders.” [DONOHUE]
 
In 1999, a Disney affiliate, Miramax Films, produced yet another Catholic-bashing movie, Dogma, “Kevin Smith’s controversial satire of Roman Catholicism.” [GEIER, T., 11-13-99] The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights claimed to have garnered 300,000 signatures in protest of the film. The Miramax Jewish co-chairmen, Bob and Harvey Weinstein, eventually “personally bought back” the movie from its parent company and forwarded distribution rights to another firm, Lion’s Gate  (co-presidents also Jewish: Mark Urman and Tom Ortenberg).
 
In 1992 the Jewish film critic and talk show host, Michael Medved, was taken aside by an unnamed” best-selling author” and “popular television commentator” at a “media accountability” conference for a heart to heart talk. “What I don’t get,” the unnamed Gentile said, “when I look at Hollywood, is why is it that so many of the people who are responsible for the worst garbage turn out to be Jews? It’s sort of become an obvious question, but nobody likes to talk about it, because nobody wants to sound like a bigot … How come they’re so set on trashing everything that the rest of us care about? I’m afraid we’ve got more and more people out there who are wondering about the same thing.” [MEDVED, p. 315]
 
“To hear this sophisticated and dynamic public figure draw a connection between Jewish involvement in Hollywood and the current degradation in Hollywood,” says Medved, “hit me with the force of a blow to the chest. No one could ever accuse him of anti-Semitism; for many years he had compiled an admirable record of service to Jewish causes and he’d made several trips to Israel.” [MEDVED, p. 315, p. 70] (Jewish assault on non-Jewish and Christian values is an old theme. In 1927, Bishop Joseph Schrembs of Cleveland, remarking on the pornography, prostitution, and general mass media trades, noted the “large and influential group of Jews who are attempting to break down Christian morality. Let us go to the decent Jews — and thanks be to God there are decent Jews and lots of them — and ask them to join hands with us to solve the common problem of commercialized vice.” [FRIEDMAN, A., 2000, p. 142]
 
Hollywood movies and television at-large have been increasingly attacked in recent years for propagating a range of decadent values.  82% of Americans polled in a 1989 Associated Press/Media General survey felt that today’s movies had too much violence, 80% felt there was too much profanity, and 72% too much nudity. 72% of a Parents magazine survey supported prohibition “against making fun of religion” in the mass media. A 1991 Gallup poll showed that 58% of Americans were “offended frequently or occasionally” by prime-time programming. A 1989 Time/CNN survey documented that 67% of the American public believes the violence in movies was “mainly to blame” for rising teenage violence; 70% supported “greater restraints on the showing of sex and violence” in the movies. [MEDVED, Hollywood, p. 4]  In the 1992 Presidential election both Bill Clinton and Robert Dole criticized Hollywood for glorifying drugs.  In 1999 the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of National Drug Control Policy released the results of a joint report that studied the content of the top movie rentals and 1,000 most popular songs of 1996-99. 98% of the films and 27% of the songs “contained reference to either alcohol or drugs, 26% of movies portrayed illicit drug use in a humorous context.” [OLDENBERG, p. 8B] And in a 2000 report, the Federal Trade Commission “accused the entire [entertainment industry] of aggressively selling violent and sexually explicit films, video games and music to kids.” [MSNBC, 4-24-01]
 
“That this [film and TV] industry,” says Michael Medved, “more firmly associated with Jews than any other business in the world, is almost universally viewed as a destructive force in our society should be viewed with concern.” [MEDVED, p. 42]  Not even focusing on the Hollywood world, in 1999, Rabbi Daniel Lapin wrote an extraordinarily unusual, and stunning, appraisal of the collective negative effects of the modern Jewish community upon the values of America:
 
    “My firm conviction is that we must engage in an honest exploration of
    the problems and shortcomings of the Jewish community and Jewish
    communal leadership. Instead of focusing on imagined enemies, we
    should ask whether dogmatic commitment to a secular-liberal vision is
    encouraging dislike for the Jewish community. Without such honest
    self-appraisal, Jews will become more and more disliked — not by
    crazed individuals but by decent Americans distressed over their
    rapidly deteriorating culture and the role of Jews in that agenda. It
    cannot escape the notice of ordinary Americans coping with the
    challenge of raising responsible children in a hostile world that many
    Jewish names and groups lead the fight for policies these Americans
    see as causing the country’s decline.” [LAPIN, D., 1999, p. 42]
 
Jewish-dominated Hollywood and its movie and music world has always been a hotbed for all sorts of vices, including drugs. All sorts of people partake in these realms, and there can be created long lists of Tinseltown drug addicts and dealers, of course, but Jews are to be found — as in so many fields — profoundly disproportionate in them (Jewish mobster Arnold Rothstein, in the early 20th century, is even credited by some with beginning the syndicated drug trade in America).  As early as the 1930s, actress Lana Turner notes her surprise at the drug interest of her Jewish husband, famous band leader Artie Shaw:
 
     “When I came back Artie and Phil [Silvers, a well-known Jewish
     comedian] were smoking what they called ‘reefers.’ I’d heard of
     marijuana, of course, but I’d never seen it before. It was associated
     mainly with jazz musicians. Artie and Phil offered me some, and I
     said no.” [TURNER, L., 1982, p. 58]   

Debbie Reynolds, another “shikseh” innocent, notes he drug world of her Jewish husband, singer Eddie Fisher:

“After his stint in Vegas, Eddie came back to Los Angeles to do a concert at the Hollywood Bowl, with Andre Kostelanetz. He had arranged for me to attend the show with Irving Berlin and General David Sarnoff, the founder of RCA, which owned NBC. There were often a number of much older, very successful men around Eddie, including Eddie Cantor, who is generally credited with having discovered him … (REYNOLDS, D., 1988, p. 101) … Whenever Eddie was working, he was surrounded by people. Milton Blackstone, Eddie’s manager was always there, along with several of Eddie’s childhood pals — like Joey Forman and Bernie Rich — who were now part of what was, I would soon learn, the inevitable entourage … (REYNOLDS, 1988, p. 101)… The night at the Bowl there was also a strange man whom I had seen briefly in passing every night at the Sands. A frumpish-looking character, always in an unpressed navy suit. He was sinister, like a Vincent Price character in a murder movie. ‘This is Dr. Max Jacobson,’ Joey said as the doctor extended what was a warm, yet clammy hand … ‘He just gives Eddie a vitamin shot before the performance, to give him a little more energy … It’s just vitamins. Gives you a lift. We all get ‘em. Even Milton, You should have Eddie get the doc to give you a shot sometime.” [REYNOLDS, D., p. 101] [All these men described by Reynolds were Jewish. Max Jacobson is the notorious doctor who led many Hollywood stars to drug addiction, injecting them with amphetamines.]

 
In more recent years cocaine has become an especially popular Hollywood drug. In 1974 Paramount Pictures’ head of production Robert Evans was replaced, largely because of his continuous problem with cocaine. In 1980 he was convicted for cocaine possession. [MCDOUGAL, p. 393, WICK, S., 87] In 1982 Jewish actor Richard Dreyfus “was arrested and charged with possession of cocaine and 31 tablets of Percodan.” [WOODWARD, 1984, p. 418] Likewise, in the 1990s actor Robert Downey, Jr. spent a year in prison for drug abuse. In an extreme case, in 1983 Hollywood agent Roy Radin, also Jewish, was found murdered, a result of his involvement in a drug ring. [WICK, p. 144] Radin, ” a six-foot, three-inch, 300-pound cocaine addict … made a fortune producing traveling vaudeville shows for Police Benevolent Associations across the country. ‘The Roy Radin Review,’ as it was called, headlined the likes of Georgie Jessel and Tiny Tim … [Radin] sometimes took 75 percent of the proceeds.” [GAINES, S., 1998, p. 246] Radin, notes singer Eddie Fisher, “was the sleaziest person I’d ever known. He was guzzling cocaine.” [FISHER, E., 1999, p. 312] Bert Schneider’s and Bob Rafelson’s film BBS company “ethic was the raucous parties, with bags of dope and bowls of coke openly displayed on coffee tables.” [MCGILLIGAN, 1994, p. 202]
 
Rachel Abramowitz notes the post-1960s elite that has come to rule Hollywood:
 
     “[Executives Paula] Weinstein and [Mark] Rosenberg and their radical
     friends typified the leftists with the cause manqué who poured into
     Hollywood from the [political] battlefields of Columbia and Stanford,
     ready to take on life on the studio expense account. Unlike their
     forebears, they weren’t self-made scrappers but tended to be well-tended  
     progeny of the upper-middle class with down-home hippie roles … They
     drank Perrier, did coke and grass [cocaine and marijuana] … Paula
     Weinstein was one of the new breed of Hollywood executives … [Their]
     intoxicants were cocaine and work.”  [ABRAMOWITZ, R., 2000, p.
     79, 134]
 
In 1991, Jewish academy award-winning film producer Julia Phillips (among her products: The Sting, Taxi Driver, Close Encounters of the Third Kind) wrote an autobiographical book about her life in the upper echelons of Hollywood movie making.  Here are some snippets from her expose about her experiences in the behind-the-scenes real-life world of Tinseltown that makes America’s movies and molds popular culture, helping towards an answer, perhaps, to the question ‘Where does Hollywood’s on-screen interest in drugs come from?’:
 
     *  “[Backstage at a Rolling Stones concert at Madison Square Garden]
     there is a smelly Israeli named Freddie who seems to be very important
     to everybody. He carries two medium sized bottles filled with rock
     cocaine. He offers some to Goldie [Hawn] and some to me. Fuck
     you, Mr. Under-Assistant West Coast Promo Man. We turn him down;
     I’ve got my own.” [PHILLIPS, p. 197]
 
     *  “Our little baby [is] asleep innocently in another room while we, two
     smart New York Jews, are imbibing in [heavy drugs].” [PHILLIPS,
     p.235]
 
     * “Jack Spratlin is a middle-echelon Hollywood drug dealer … [He] is
     an acid casualty. He was meant to be one thing — an upwardly mobile
     street Jew from New York who came to Hollywood to be an agent
     and a luminary — but he became another because of drugs.” [PHILLIPS,
     p. 235]
 
     * “I let Spratlin fuck me from behind in the closet in front of the mirror
     just before I leave for the morning.” [PHILLIPS, p. 327]
 
     * “The seductive thing about freebase, for me anyway, is that at first I
     have the illusion that I am doing substantially less cocaine than if I
     toot it … I learn a rough [drug] recipe from a nice Jewish dealer in
     the Valley.” [PHILLIPS, p. 358]
 
     * “One morning Rottweiler wakes up in bed in a bad mood. We’ve run
      out of blow the night before and he’s down downed himself out with
      Quaaludes. Like all male junkies, he uses dope as a reason not to
      bathe. Like all Jewish girls, there is nothing in the world to keep
      me from a daily shower and shampoo. Not even freebase.” [PHILLIPS,
      p. 358]
 
      * “I actually smoke freebase in the hospital, right up to the abortion.”
      [PHILLIPS, p. 376]
 
       * “I sleep with Michael Brandon, but I do a taste of this and that as
       sexual aids. Basically, I mix Quaaludes and Atvion and pot … Upon
       awakening the next morning, I look at him and he is cute, but I
       surprise both of us by bursting into terrible heaving sob/tears. Being
       Jewish and funny, Michael defends himself with some pretty good
       jokes.” [PHILLIPS, p. 453]
 
Ned Wynn (of partial Jewish heritage: actor, screenwriter, and son of comedian Keenan Wynn), recalls his first encounter with cocaine in the Hollywood world, thanks to singer Cass Elliot (born Ellen Naomi Cohen):
 
     “I had been introduced to cocaine by Cass Elliot, the lead female
     singer with the Mamas and the Papas. An enormous woman of
     appetites yet unfathomed, Cass had literally chased me around
     at a party John had taken me to one night. She had cornered me
     and actually spooned coke into my nose. Caught like a rabbit in
     the glare of Cass’s eyeballs, I wrinkled and twitched and snorted
     and lit up like a little light bulb. Cass, you dog. I was in.” [WYNN,
     N., 1990, p. 199]

Here’s what Jewish author Susan Bluestein Davis (husband of late movie star and drugs/AIDS burn-out Brad Davis) notes about Hollywood and cocaine:

“[In the late 1970s] Like any hot actor, Brad had an aura, a frenzy about him, and wherever he went, people feted him with cocaine. At parties, meetings, dinners. The drug was everywhere and used by everyone, from stars and directors right down to the lowest grip. Everyone had it supplied. Meetings would be taken and cocaine was part of the refreshments. It was on every set, often written in as a soft expense on the film’s budget. And not just for people you read about in Variety, but friends, agents I had known in New York who were now out in Los Angeles setting up their own agencies, their own production companies — these people used it as if it were nothing.”[DAVIS, S, 1997, p. 81]

 
In 1995, Marvin Shick wrote an article in the Jewish Week, saying that:
 
      “Much has been made of the abundance of high-profile Jews in the
       lower-depths of the entertainment industry. While it won’t do to simply
       say it ain’t so, for it is,  … I do not feel especially guilty because of the
       wrongful behavior of certain Jews, whether they are secular sleaze
       merchants or chasidim … But I am embarrassed, even hurt, when
       wrongdoers are honored, which happens too often in our fervid world
       of organizations and fund raising. It is my understanding that in
       Hollywood ‘humanitarian’ awards are handed out promiscuously,
       with Jewish organizations well in the lead … It’s … a mistake for
       our community to have so little to say about the cultural depravity all
       around us … It is insufficient for us to act like a community of amateur
       constitutional lawyers whenever someone shouts ‘First Amendment’ to
       protect the cesspool of moral corruption.” [SCHICK, p. 5]
 
Jewish film critic Steve Walz noted with concern the rise of violently and morally reckless “teenager films” in the late 1990s. “The most controversial teen flick [Cruel Intentions],” he observes, has “several Jewish and half-Jewish stars, writers, producers, etc. involved in this flick, which basically depicts wicked teenagers trying to bed each other based on vicious dares … Teenage crime figures are on the rise and anyone who tells you that there ISN’T a direct correlation between what teens see on the big screen or small screen and their anti-social relations is a flat out liar.” [WALZ, 3-1-98] The plot of Cruel Intentions, noted the Los Angeles Times, “revolves around a rich New York City high school girl who snorts cocaine from her crucifix and bets her stepbrother he can’t deflower a certain virgin. She offers him sexual relations with her as the prize, if he wins.” [JENSEN, E., p. F1]
 
Jewsin fact have a long history of testing the limits of popular morality and exploring sexuality’s potential for profitability. They dominated the early 1900s vaudeville scene and were prominent in the development of the striptease as entertainment, as part as the package known as burlesque (“the most sexualy suggestive and sexually explicit of all of New York’s popular media”). [FREIDMAN, A., 2000, p. 62]   After all, as an earlier chapter evidences, and as Yale professor Donald Davis phrases it, “the Jewish pimps and vice lords … dominated the white slave trade traffic and its ‘sex industry’ in the early twentieth century.” [DAVIS, D., p. 29]  “Jewish male comics,” also notes Andrea Most, “regularly appeared in drag on the Broadway and vaudeville stage.” [MOST, A., 1999, p. 322]In the early to mid-20th century, a number of anti-vice organizations sought to curtail some trends in the New York entertainment industry, which was largely Jewish. (Sometimes underscoring ethnic/religious undercurrents, these included expressly Catholic organizations like the Legion of Decency and the National Organization for Decent Literature). “New York’s position as the nation’s cultural mecca,” notes Andrea Friedman, “and the important role played by entertainment industries in the city’s economy, made the conflicts over obscenity that occured there unique in their importance to municipal life … The substantial role played by Jews in New York’s entertainment industries made debates about obscenity especially important to many Jewish leaders.” [FRIEDMAN, A., 2000, p. 10] In 1942, New York City refused to renew city burlesque theatre licenses, shutting them all down. [FRIEDMAN, A., 2000, p. 62] “Jews,” notes Jewish scholar Friedman,

      “were also well represented among New York’s theatrical producers, and burlesque
      in particular was notable for the presence of Jews among producers, managers, and
      entertainers … The visibility of Jews in these industries nourished Christian
     fears that commercial culture in the metropolis would become even more
     corrupt and corrupting than it already was. Their association with an entertainment
     world built around the commodification of sexuality seeemed to sustain a
     preexisting paradigm of antisemitism that fused prejudices regarding
     Jewish greed and sexual immorality in the conviction, as historian Edward
     Bristow had phrased it, that Jews ‘organized widespread conspiracies to
     corrupt and pollute the Christian world.’ In the United States, as in Europe,
     many Christians subscribed to the view that Jews were so avaricious
     that they would permit neither legalities nor morals to stand in their way
     of their accumulation of wealth.” [FRIEDMAN, A., 2000 , p. 141]

Friedman also notes the main reason for eventual Jewish religious activism in some anti-obscenity groups — fears of anti-Semitism:

     “Some of New York’s Jewish religious leaders also became more vocal in debates
     about obscenity during the 1920s and 1930s. To a greater degree than Protestants and
      Catholics, however, their participation came in response as much
     to the existence of anti-obscenity campaigns as to the existence of obscenity. Rabbis     
     entered into anti-obscenity activism in the attempt to counter Christians’
     perceptions of Jews as a different, alien, and more primitive people, by
     demonstrating that they shared the ‘Christian’ morals of their Protestant
     and Catholic brethren and by trying to control the behavior of other Jews.
     Prompted by the concern that Christian condemnations of obscenity
     might fuel antisemitism (and vice versa), they sometimes joined in such
     condemnations in self-defense. For Jews, anti-obscenity activism became a
     strategy for protecting the Jewish community by policing it.” [FRIEDMAN, A.,
     2000, p. 140-141]

The most famous stripper of all time, Gypsy Rose Lee  (real name: Rose Louise Hovick) was Jewish, as was her early forum — Minsky’s Theatre (of “The Night They Raided Minsky’s” fame). The theatre founders were Abe and Billy Minsky, grandsons of the chief rabbi of the Russian city of Minsk. Another Minsky, Herbert, was the “maestro of burlesque.” [COOPER, p. 42] (The Minsky’s New Gotham Burlesque House was raided on April 8, 1937, and its Jewish manager, Sam Kraus, jailed. Other Minsky venues included the Republic and Oriental Burlesque sites. As Jay Maeder observes, “New Gotham operator Abe Minsky was one of numerous Minsky brothers who had largely cornered the stripper business in New York.” Jewish “civil rights” lawyer Morris Ernst declared that the raid was a “step in the direction of fascism.”) [MAEDER, J., 6-26-2000] Elsewhere in New York City, among many other Jewish madams, was “Polly Adler, the Polish-born madam of New York’s most famous bordello of the 1920s and 1930s.” [MCDOUGAL, p. 92]     

Jewish comic and eventual TV superstar Milton Berle recalls Adler’s brothel:”When I had a night off from the Paradise, John Garfield [the actor, born Julius Garfinkle], who was a good friend, and I went over to Polly Adler’s for dinner. Sure, the world knew Polly as a [brothel] madam, but her friends knew her as an intelligent woman, fun to be with, and a good cook. After dinner, Polly excused herself because she had to make some telephone calls to arrange for girls for her clients. John and I were talking when I said, ‘I don’t know about you, Julie (his real name was Jules), but I feel sort of horny.’ John thought he might feel the same way, so we spoke to Polly about it, and she said she could get us two of her $100 girls — Polly handled only the best — and send them around to wherever we said. John and I went our separate ways to await our deliveries. When the doorbell rang at my place, there was Carole [a woman Berle had been dating and already having an affair with].” [BERLE, M., 1974, p 186]

A little earlier, “the most famous madam in turn-of-the century New York was Rosie Hertz. Saving enough from her own prostitution, she and her husband, Jacob, opened several brothels on the Lower East Side during the 1880s … The epitome of the ‘white slaver,’ Hertz was called by one judge the ‘godmother for prostitutes.’ Another critic considered her ‘as much a public feature of the lower East Side … as the Brooklyn Bridge.” [GILFOYLE, T., 1992, p. 295]

Dallas, Texas? When Jack Ruby (Rubenstein) murdered Lee Harvey Oswald in 1963, he owned the Carousel, a local strip tease joint. As Gerald Posner notes, “Ruby’s main competition was from the Theatre and Colony Clubs, owned by two brothers, Abe and Barney Weinstein. In 1961, they had introduced amateur strip-tease dancing.” [POSNER, p. 362] Atlanta, Georgia? By 1999, owner Steve Kaplan’s Gold Club “nude dancing” business had been “indicted on federal racketeering charges that included prostitution, credit card fraud, money laundering, police corruption and ties to the Gambino organized crime family.” His lawyer, Alan Begner, was also Jewish. “Since 1982,” noted the Atlanta Journal and Constitution, “Begner has carved a lucrative niche as a lawyer of adult entertainment establishments,” representing about half of the 45 in metropolitan Atlanta. “I knock out laws,” he explained to the newspaper. Begner’s interest in strip joints began when another Jewish owner (Emmanual Isaacs of the “She Club”) asked him to represent him. [RANKIN, B., 12-5-99, p. 2D]
   
The Associated Press further noted in 2001 that Gold Club owner Steven Kaplan (club manager: Norbert Calder) was

     “accused of building a $50 million fortune in part by providing prostitutes
     for celebrities. Atlanta’s Gold Club is one of the most profitable nude clubs
     in the country, popular among convention-goers and visiting celebrities.   
     Federal investigators say it is also a high-priced brothel that pumps cash into
     the Gambino crime family … [The Federal indictment against Kaplan] says
     Kaplan ordered more than 20 beatings of people who did not repay loans
     at high rates of interest.” [COURT TV, 4-2001]

The most famous “sex club” in history (prospering in the 1970s and 1980s before the AIDS epidemic) is probably Plato’s Retreat, based in New York City. Its owner was also Jewish: Larry Levenson. As Jewish scholar David Allyn describes it:

     “First of all, you have to picture the Ansonia Hotel, which is a late 19th century
     wedding-cake of a building in the heart of the upper west side in New York. In
     the basement of the Ansonia was Plato’s Retreat, then the world’s most famous
     sex club. Men and women would stroll about the Ansonia lobby in nothing but
     towels. In the club, they would have sex with possibly a dozen or so people
     in a single night. Plato’s Retreat represented the commercial version of what was
     happening in people’s apartments and living rooms across the country.”
     [BOOKMARK, 2000]

In the early movie world, seminal Jewish “vamp” film actress Theda Bara “scandalized the mores of the middle-classes … Local boards issued edicts condemning her films.” [HYMAN, p. 118-119] “The first sex symbol [Bara] in movie history,” says M. H. Goldberg, “was Jewish. (It is interesting to note that two other sex symbols in movie history — Marilyn Monroe and Elizabeth Taylor — converted to Judaism.)” [GOLDBERG, H. M., 1976, p. 166] A little earlier, Anna Held, of Polish Jewish descent, celebrated a “naughty French persona” in the Ziegfield Follies and “was an early icon” of “America’s burgeoning cult of celebrity at the turn of the century.” [LAVITT, P., 2000, p. 263, 268] Vienna-born Jewish actress Hedy Lamarr (Hedwig Kiesler) pushed mores in the movie world with the European film Ecstasy (1933), featuring partial nudity and daringly new degrees of eroticism. The film was banned in the U.S. till 1940.
 
In the early years of the 20th century, Sholom Asch’s play “God of Vengeance” was performed in New York in Yiddish and then in English off-Broadway without incident. “Asch’s tale centers on Yankel, a Jew who runs a shady downstairs brothel with his ex-whore wife, yet is obsessed with protecting the chastity and piety of his young daughter.” When the play was finally performed to a broader public on Broadway, it was “shut down by New York police, a landmark censorship case … The actors, producer, and owner of the Apollo Theatre” were all arrested and their court trial became “the first jury conviction of American entertainers charged with presenting ‘immoral’ fare.” Variety magazine called the play “the most disgusting play every presented on Broadway.” [BERSON, M., 4-2-2000]
 
Cartoon character Betty Boop? The Fleischer brothers, Max and Dave, notes Amelia Holberg,
 
      “created and controlled one of the great 30s sex symbols, animated
      Betty Boop. Betty’s cartoons, remembered vividly for their overt
      sexuality and often grotesque imagery, are even more provocative
      when viewed in relation to the lives of her working-class Eastern
      European immigrant, Jewish creators … Betty’s initial disappearance
      can be traced to the Hays Production Code Office, which determined
      Betty Boop to be too racy for general audiences in 1934.” [HOLBERG,
      A., 1999, p. 290-291]

[Chaim Bermant notes a little more about Will Hays and the tearing down of popular mores: “The Jewish dominance of Hollywood did not, of course, pass without comment. By the end of World War I it became clear that the cinema was becoming, if it had not already become, the supreme influence in the cultural life of America, affecting its tastes, its habits, its outlook. There was a growing clamour — to quote the words of one influential pressure group — ‘to rescue the motion pictures from the hands of the Devil and five hundred un-Christian Jews.’ To defend themslves against such criticism, Mayer, Laemmle, Goldwyn and the other un-Christian Jews grouped themselves into the Motion Pictures Prodducers and Distributors of America Inc., and invited Will H. Hayes to preside over them. In doing so they were not merely attempting to buy-off criticism, they were buying respectability.”] [BERMANT, C., 1977, p. 102]

The Fleischer brothers also created Popeye, and many other characters in the 1930s. In fact, “Jews represent 80 percent of the pioneers and leaders of the comic book industry.” [GOLDBERG, M. H., 1979, p. 118] In the molding of popular American culture, Mad magazine (publisher: William Gaines. Editors Al Feldstein and Harvey Kurtzman. All Jewish. Kurtzman formerly worked for the communist paper the Daily Worker.) [HEILBRUNN J., 6-01] Mad’s “most popular artists” were also Jewish: Mort Drucker and Al Jaffee. [GOODWIN, G., 2001, p. 159] Mad magazine was influential in creating a new kind of adolescent. “Americans of Jewish background,” note Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter,

     “developed a direct and important influence on adolescents and even pre-
     adolescents in othe ways. Starting in the 1950s, Mad Magazine developed
     wide popularity among this group, and, as Marie Winn had pointed out,
     it played a significant role in ‘the move toward free expression among
     children; its relentless exposure of parental dishonesty caused shock
     waves and reaction among its young readers.’ From the beginning
     Mad‘s editors have been Jewish and, as they themselves would agree,
     hostile to the American civic myth.” [ROTHMAN/LICHTER, 1982,
     p. 108]

Joe Shuster and Jerome Siegel created Superman. Bob Kane created Batman; Stan Lee created Spiderman and The Hulk. Jewish all. [ETKES/STADTMAUER, 1995, p. 128] Stan “the Man” Lee “revived Marvel Comics. He invented the superhero as anti-hero … A 1965 college poll conducted by Esquire … revealed that student radicals ranked Spider-Man and the Hilk alongside the likes of Bob Dylan [also Jewish] and Che Guevara as their favorite revolutionary icons … The outsider hero had arrived as the most celebrated figure in youth culture, and Marvel had him.” [HEILBRUNN, J., 6-01] Head of DC comics (Superman, et al)? Also Jewish: Jenette Kahn (1998).

The Jewish Forward noted the Jewish dimension to the comics world and the blockbuster movie Spiderman in 2002:

      “Sure, Spiderman’s great. He’s a nebbish who happens to have super-human
      powers. He’s got radioactive blood, he detects trouble with his Spider sense,
      he catches thieves just like flies, all while smashing box-office records by taking
      in $114 million his first weekend as a movie star. According to Dan Raviv,
      however, the real heroes of Marvel Comics are the two Israeli men at the
      company’s helm, Isaac (Ike) Perlmutter and Avi Arad. In this real-life drama,
      they’re the two little guys who wrestled Marvel away from sparring billionaires,
       transforming a bankrupt company into a highly profitable one. Exactly how
      two underdogs beat seasoned tycoons at their own game is the kind of fairy
      tale that movies are made of, and it makes for interesting reading in Raviv’s
      latest book, ‘Comic Wars: How Two Tycoons Battled Over the Marvel
      Comics Empire and Both Lost’ (Broadway Books). The good guys are the
      immigrant owners of a small toy company — albeit one with exclusive rights
      to license Marvel toys. And the bad guys are two titans of finance: Ronald
      Perelman
, the Revlon chief and takeover artist who ran Marvel into bankruptcy,
      and corporate predator Carl Icahn [both Perelman and Icahn are also Jewish]
      — a model for Michael Douglas’s character in ‘Wall Street’ — who attempted
      a hostile takeover. In the end the Israelis, predicting the Marvel superheroes’
      ability to jump from comic book pages to the silver screen, unexpectedly seized
       control of the company … The story of Marvel is a Jewish one indeed. Founded
      in 1939 by Martin Goodman, Marvel was a part of the so-called “golden age”
      of comics, when hordes of young Jewish writers and artists, most of them
      struggling immigrants’ sons, created armies of imaginary superheroes like
      Superman and Captain America, whose mission was to wage war against Nazis
      and their ilk. At Marvel in particular, the key players throughout the decades,
      including Jacob Kurtzberg and Stanley Lieber — better known as Jack Kirby
      and Stan Lee, the creators of the Fantastic Four and Spider-Man in the early 1960s
      — have been almost exclusively Jewish.” [KEYS, L., 5-10-2002]

Cartoonists Jules Feiffer, Al Capp (the author of L’il Abner; Capp’s original name was Alfred Gerald Caplin), Herblock (Herb Bloch), Ralph Bakshi, Rube Goldberg, illustrator Maurice Sendak, Shel Silverstein, Nicole Hollander, and many others are also Jewish. Isador (Fritz)Freleng was the “creator of Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Porky Pig, Tweety Pie, Speedy Gonzalez, and the Pink Panther.” [ETKES/STADTMAUER, 1995, p. 128] “To my mind,” says Stan Sulkes, echoing legend about Jewish history, “no one is more Jewish than Bugs Bunny. Or more resourceful. Surrounded by enemies, he survived by his wits, thwarting all the Elmer Fudds of this world unwilling to let him live in peace. Happily, I’m not alone in that view. Another transplanted New Yorker recognizes Bugs’ ethnicity too. ‘It was no accident,’ observes David Gilner, director of Libraries for Hebrew Union College, ‘that his animator was Fritz Feleng, and his voice supplied by Mel Blanc — both of whom were Jewish.” [SULKES, S., 4-21-97]

A former major in the Israeli army reserves, Ranan Lurie (now living in the United States) is the “world’s most syndicated political cartoonist;” he is featured in 106 countries and 1,100 newspapers. [LIEBENSON, p. 13CN, 21] Betty Cohen even is president today of the Cartoon Network, the cable TV channel that has 60 million subscribers in 144 countries throughout the world. [POLLAK, S., 1-7-00]

Cartoonist Albert Hirschfeld (who once worked for the communist magazine The Masses) has appeared, for over seven decades, “frequently and prominently on the pages of the New York Times. He has published several cofee-table volumes, and a Manhattan gallery, Margo Feiden, deals exclusively with his drawings and limited edition prints … Twice during the 1990s he received commissions for postage stamps.” Will Eisner “made an important name for himself both as the father of his own comic strip and as developer of ‘instructional’ comics.” His company, American Visuals, has contracted for organizations as diverse as the Girl Scouts and the American Dental Association. [GOODWIN, G., 2001, p. 151, 154]In the 1950s, the Jewish-dominated comic book industry raised familiar issues — public concern that they were influential in the degradation of popular morals and values. In 1955-56 the U.S. Senate held investigations into the matter, releasing a report entitled “Comic Books and Juvenile Delinquency.” The Senate document noted that

     “on first impression, the present comic book industry would seem to comprise
      many different publishing firms with no apparent relationship to one another … On
      closer scruutiny, however it is found that the picture is entirely different … The
      676 comic book titles [that were examined] are published by 111 companies
      owned by only 121 persons or families in addition to 1 corporation … The
      majority of the publishers maintain editorial offices in New York City.”
      [U.S. Senate, 1955-56]

Subsections of the report included “Techniques of Crime Taught by Crime and Horror Comics,” “Criminal Careers as Glamorous in Crime and Horror Comic Books, and “Defenders of Law and Order [Are] Frequently Represented as All Powerful Beings Who Kill and Commit Other Crimes to Defend ‘Justice.'” Jewish comic book entrepreneurs who are singled out by the report include direct-mail advertiser Samuel Roth “who has for many years been engaged in using the mail to advertise lewd and lascivious material,” and Alex Segal who “testifed that ‘by mistake’ one of his trays of addressograph plates bearing the names of 400 children was routed to the publisher of sex literature.” In the listings of owners and distributors of comic book businesses, among the best known are Marvel Comic group (owners: Martin and Jean Goodman) and Archie Comic Group (owners: Maurice Coyne, John Goldwater, and Lewis H. Silberkleit). [U.S. SENATE, 1955-56]

Mad magazine’s William Gaines also produced “the greatest of the under-the-covers-with-a-flashlight genre.” These comics, featuring new explorations of gore, include Tales from the Crypt, Weird Science, Shock Suspensestories, Frontline Combat,

      “and a few other titles [that] made the struggling company profitable and Gaines a
      fully employed pop culture mentor of the first magnitude. But this upstart Jewish
      kid was soon put out of business by a crusading psychiatrist from the old country,
      a nasty bunch of Senators, and a coalition of PTA and American Legion, sheriffs
      and bishops, editors and aldermen. The Comics Code that was created to deflect
      the heat couldn’t help Gaines. The slander was so thorough that his books were
      returned unopened by retailers even after the Code seal was applied. By the end
      of 1954, after just a four year run, the EC [Gaines’ company] comics were all gone,
      except for the satirical Mad.” [TEBBEL, J., 1999]

As Jacob Heilbrunn notes, in a review of a book about comic books by scholar Bradford W. Wright,

     “EC comics offered something of a precursor to the upheaval of the 1960s,
     questioning authority before it became fashionable to question anything. In perhaps
     the most notorious panel printed by EC comics, a murderous baseball team
     plays a midnight game with the limbs and entrails of a victim. Little was left to the
     imagination … Another issue depicted a man hodling a bloody ax in one hand and a
     woman’s severed head in the other. ‘Corpses in various states of decay and reanimation,’
      Wright says, ‘regularly adorned the covers.’ ‘A commercial expression of cultural
     defiance ,’ he writes, ‘EC brilliantly perceived the alienated generation among
     young people and recognized youth dissatisfaction as a marketable commodity.’
     The reaction came quickly. By 1948, Catholic schools were conducting bonfires
     of comic books … Soon enough, William M. Gaines, the publisher of EC, found
     himself facing off against a Senate investigative committtee headed by Estes
     Kefauver. It was a rout. Kefauver delcared that a panel in the July issue ‘seems
     to be a man with a woman in a boat and he is choking her to death with a crowbar.
     Is that in good taste?’ ‘I think so,’ was all Gaines could answer.” [HEIBRUNN, J.,
     6-01]

Moving along in the Jewish influence world, even the nightclub business, says Kenneth Kanter, “was invented by a Jew, Jack Levy.” [KANTER, p. 38] Billy Rose, another Jewish entrepreneur, was “a pioneer of nightclub entertainment. He opened in 1924 with a small club for people of modest means, and he remained only modestly successful till he built up the Diamond Horseshoe, which became the largest, plushiest and most celebnrated establishment of its type and which was deciedly for people of immodest means and even less modest taste. Here too the accent was on glamour, with successive arrays of splendid women splendily semi-attired.” [BERMANT, C., 1977, p. 90] [See elsewhere in this volume discussions of Jewish ownership of everything from Club Med to the Cotton Club]. Glasgow, Scotland? Stefan King (“half-Jewish and half-Catholic”) “opened Glasgow’s first gay nightclub.” [MULFORD, S., 2000, p 35]  “By 1920,” adds Stephen Birmingham, “much of the Prohibition liquor trade was in Jewish hands, and a good number of the speakeasies and nightclubs where would-be stars could do their turns was also Jewish owned.” [BIRMINGHAM, p. 190]
 
In 1999, the Village Voice interviewed Luke Ford, author of A History of X: 100 Years of Sex in Films and a convert, of all things, to Judaism. “Publishers Weekly ” Ford said,  “took me to task for that ‘offensive generalization’ about Jews but it’s true. The big machers [in the pornography] industry are Jewish — Steve Hirsch, Paul Fishbein (who runs and publishes Adult Video News), and David Sturman, who owns [production company] Sin City.” [BUNN, March 3-9, 99]  Fishbein, notes the Los Angeles Times, is the “editor and publisher of the Van Nuys-based trade magazine Adult Video News, generally considered the authoritative guide to the $9 billion U.S. sex business … Fishbein became a [porn] industry spokesman and advocate, a role he has retained to this day.” [COLLINS, S., 7-8-99, p. C1]

As Jewish scholar Jay Gertzman notes: “David Hebditch and Nick Anning, researching the pornography business in the mid-1980s, report that ‘some industry insiders claim that porn in the United States is essentially a Jewish business.'” “If this is so,” adds Gertzman, with a little spin control for Jewish economic endeavors, “it is because Jews have for a very long time cultivated the temperament and talents of the middlemen, and they are proud of these abilities.” [GERTZMAN, J., 2000, p. 289]

 
In his book, Ford goes further, pointing to a strong Jewish influence across American culture that helped swing open the doors to increased sexual permissiveness, an overhaul of traditional moralities, and, ultimately, increased popular tolerance of pornography, noting that
 
     “Those who pushed America to a more liberal view of sex were mainly
     male non-Jewish Jews (Jews alienated from Judaism and Jewish life
     as well as the Christian culture embraced by a majority of Americans)
     including Samuel Roth of the 1957 Supreme Court case [that tested
     laws concerning the depiction of sexuality]; Grove Press publisher
     Barney Rossett; the owner of Olympia Press, Maurice Girodias, and
     his father, Jack Kahane, a Paris publisher and author of sexually
     explicit novels; comedian Lenny Bruce; filmmakers Russ Meyer,
     David Friedman, and Randy Metzger; Austrian psychiatrist Wilhelm
     Reich; Screw publisher Al Goldstein; Eros publisher Ralph Ginzburg
     [Ginzburg served time in prison on obscenity charges for his magazine
     Eros; he later became editor and publisher of Moneysworth)]
     [GREENBERG, M., p. 54; his publications Blue Ball and Intercourse
     were mailed from the conservative Pennsylvania Dutch area: GERTZMAN,
      J., 2000, p. 287] ]; publisher Edward Mishkin; Jack Valenti,
     president of the Motion Picture Association of America; defense lawyer
     Stanley Fleishman; Playboy playmate and Hugh Hefner’s ex-lover Barbara
     Klein (aka Barbie Benton); Hefner’s personal secretary, Bobbie Arnstein;
     philosopher Herbert Marcuse; psychologist Albert Ellis; authors
     Philip Roth, William Styron, and Norman Mailer; and Supreme
     Court Justice Abe Fortas. They carried on a hundred-year history
     of radical Jews challenging the reigning order.” [FORD, p. 21]
 
(Ford’s above list, however, is wrong on at least one count: William Styron isn’t Jewish. It’s not hard to understand, however, where the error came from. As Truman Capote once noted about Styron’s presence in the Jewish literary establishment, “if ever there was a goy Yid, it’s Bill Styron.”)  [VOLKMAN, p. 96]
 
Among those in Ford’s tally, after a “watershed” court case over obscenity, Barney Rosset’s Grove Press published, in 1959, D. H. Lawrence’s then-scandalous Lady Chatterly’s Lover; Rosset also “precipitated another censorship brouhaha in 1968 when Grove‘s Evergreen Films imported the sexually explicit I am Curious Yellow from Sweden.” [BLACKWELL, E., 1973, p. 417] Among works published by Kahane and Girodias that have become standards of literature were controversial works by Henry Miller, and Lolita.

Samuel Roth is noteworthy in the pornography trade for many reasons. Although some might portray him as a free speech hero, he pirated editions of both James Joyce’s Ulysses and D. H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterly’s Lover, to the protest of both the Joyce and Lawrence estates. Imprisoned twice, 1937-1939 and 1957-61, Roth was labeled “the dirtiest pig in the world” and “the louse of Lewisburg [prison]” [GERTZMAN, J., 2000, p. 219] Roth in 1936 “received the most severe prison sentence possible under the law for brazenly using the Postal Service to distribute flagrantly obscene books … Roth was the most often incarcerated, the most feckless, and quite likely the most resourceful booklegger of his time, challenging moral and legal authorities with a quixotic bravado.” [GERTZMAN, J., 1999, p. 22] Other “chief mail-order erotica dealers were Esar Levine and Benjamin Rebhuhn.” [GERTZMAN, J., p. 26] Both served prison terms on obscenity charges. “Great ‘art erotica’ suppliers” included Jake Zeitlin, Harry F. Marks, Ben Abramson, and David Moss. [GERTZMAN, J., 1999, p. 61] Alleged Jewish porn pushers at a Congressional investigation of the New York pornography system included Irving Klaw (“self-styled King of the Pin-ups”), Edward Mishkin, and Abraham Rubin. [GERTZMAN, J., 2000, p. 278] Martin Kamin was a “supplier of of borderline erotica.” [GERTZMAN, J., 2000, p. 177] Other “offenders” in the erotica trade included Earl Marks, Solomon Malkin, Alex Field, Henry Klein, Raymond Thomson, Al Picker, Joseph Seiffer, Max Gottschalk, and David Moss. [GERTZMAN, J., 2000, p. 31] Jewish erotica book publishers included William Faro, Panurge, Falstaff (“Falstaff gave special prominence to the work of Iwan Bloch,” also Jewish, “the father of sexology”) [GERTZMAN, J., 2000, p. 193], Robin Hood House, the American Anthropological Society, American Ethnological Press, Jul-Mar, Julian, Risus, Biblion Balzac, Pickwick, Parnassus Book Shops, Abbey, Allied Book, Emerson, Pioneer and Franklin. [GERTZMAN, J., 2000, p. 192-193]

Jewish scholar Jay Gertzman, whose own uncle’s bookshop was once raided in Philadelphia, [GERTZMAN, J., p. 287] notes that Jews built the “erotica” book business in New York (the heart of American publishing) and that there was an

      “absence of any single ethnic group of erotica dealers in New York City prior to
      the Jewish presence … In several cases, the erotica dealer’s relatives were business
       partners. One could trust uncles and brothers, and possibly no one else … The
       underground printing of many banned erotic classics … was the work of two brothers,
       Adolph and Rudolph Loewinger; another pair, David and Jacob Brotman, was
       responsible for a large part of the lubricious under-the-counter pamphlets and
       paper-bound books [moral watchdog groups] decried as flagitious. Jack Brussel, Sam
       Roth’s partner at the start of the latter’s career, enlisted the aid of his first wife …
       Benjamin Rebhuhn’s  office manager was his nephew, and his wife was listed as
       director of the Falstaff Press Inc. Esar Levine and his brother Benjamin, close friends
       of  the Rebhuhns, were editor and business manager, respectively, of the Panurge
       Press.”       [GERTZMAN, J., p. 29, p. 30]
    
By 1939, according to a major anti-smut organization, the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice, 28 of 32 people arrested that year in New York City for obscenity-related law-breaking were Jewish (the number may have been even higher: two of the 32 did not have their religion/ethnicity listed. [These figures are cited by Gertzman, who accepts them as credible. [GETZMAN, J., 2000, p. 29]

 As Gertzman notes, in classical Jewish outsider-insider terms,

     “Erotica dealers formed a tight-knit, and therefore persistent, resourceful, and
     resilently successful entity. They were easy to stigmatize as a group [by non-Jews]
     set apart from the majority, even if they had the same goals and methods of doing
     business as general book dealers. In New York at least, during the period from
     1880 to 1940, many were members of Jewish immigrant families. Jewish erotica
     dealers seem to have become prominent in the field soon after the eastern
     European immigrants began arriving in record numbers in 1880.”
      [GERTZMAN, J., p. 28]

The Jerusalem Post concluded a review of Gertzman’s book about the Jewish dominated smut-trade like this:

     “Gertzman himself acknowledges towards the end of his book that his uncle
     once ran the most notorious ‘dirty bookshop’ in Philadelphia. For that
     matter, Sam Roth’s grandson is none other than Prof. James Kugel, the eminent
     Bible scholar at Harvard University. If there’s a more complicated and
     surprising tribe on earth, I’ve yet to hear about it.” [NESVISKY, M., 3-9-00]

There are many other Jewish public figures, in various fields, that might merit addition to a Luke Ford-like list of Jewish assault upon dominant culture morality. In literature, homosexual Allen Ginsberg’s 1950s-era obscenity trial in San Francisco about his poem “Howl” (another landmark in popular culture) escalated him thereafter to fame. As Ginsberg’s Jewish ideological nemesis, “neo-Conservative” Norman Podhoretz, notes:

     “As the 60’s wore on, I came more and more to see all this [hippie era] as a
     new kind of plague … I ended with a lament for the victims it had claimed
     among the ‘especially vulnerable’ young … [There were] shades of antinomian propaganda
     Ginsberg had done as much as anyone else in America to spread … Ginsberg
     was also fulsomely praised as a pioneer of the gay-rights movement, which indeed
     he was. Yet so far as I have been able to determine, no one thought to draw
     a connection between the emergence of AIDS and the rampant homosexual
     promiscuity promoted by Ginsberg (with buggery as an especially ‘joyful’
     feature that is described in loving detail in poem after pornographic — yes,
     pornographic — poem. And I could find only one mention (in the Weekly
     Standard
) of Ginsberg’s active sponsorship of the abominable North
     American Man Boy Alliance (NAMBLA), an organization devoted to the
     legalization of homosexual pedophilia. (‘I don’t know exactly how to define
     what’s underage,’ he once explained, quickly adding that he himself had ‘never
     made it with anyone under fifteen.’)” [PODHORETZ, N., 2000]

The 1966 (Jewish comedian) Lenny Bruce trial was also one of the trials of the 20th century. [GOODWIN, E., 1995, p. 301] He and Cafe Au Go Go owner Howard Solomon were eventually found guilty of obscenity. Bruce’s “chief attorney, Efraim London, [was] a veteran of more than 250 censorship and obscenity cases … The verdict seemed to unhinge Bruce. He became obsessed with appellate litigation. Those legal wheels were still grinding when, on August 3, 1966, he was found dead in his Hollywood home, a hypodermic syringe nearby. An autopsy revealed the presence of morphine. Death was recorded as accidental.” [KNAPPMAN, E., 1995, p. 301-304]

A good friend of Lenny Bruce was Paul Krassner, editor of the satire magazine, The Realist, self-described as “the hippest magazine in America.” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 44] Krassner was also Jewish. Another Jewish close friend, Lyle Stuart (born Lionel Simon) was editor of “an anti-censorship tabloid called Expose … Lyle became my media mentor and my unrelenting guru.” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 32] Krassner’s autobiography explores his adventures and influence in the so-called 1960s-born “counterculture.” Krassner also began writing a column for Stuart’s magazine called The Independent, which also featured the sexual works of Albert Ellis, eventually anthologized as Sex Without Guilt. [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 32] “When I had been working for Lyle [Stuart],” says Krassner, “Ralph Ginzburg was preparing An Unhurried View of Erotica. I recommended that Lyle turn down the opportunity to be copublishers, which he did. Nevertheless, he guided Ginzburg through the book’s publication — finding him a typesetter, a printer, a distributor, a mailing house, and when the Post Office seized Ginzburg’s mailing piece, Lyle sent attorney Martin Scheiman to Washington to obtain release of the mailing.” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 97] (This ring of publishers/writers also includes William Gaines, also Jewish, head of a comic book dynasty [see later discussions of him and Mad magazine, and the U.S. Senate attacks upon his products’ content.)

      “An Italian magazine, Playman, had published full frontal nude photos of Jacqueline Kennedy taken on a Greek island by the grace of a telephonto lens. Lyle Stuart brought the issue from Italy and gave it to Al Goldstein, who reprinted the photos in his raunchy tabloid, Screw. Then Larry Flynt published a five-page spread in Hustler.” [KRASSNER, P., 1993,p. 237] Krassner is proud enough of his following observation, which he shared with Lenny Bruce and in his autobiography: “One time we were walking around and passed a newstand where, on the cover of Newsweek, there was a photo of Caroline Kennedy, the president’s young daughter. I commented: ‘She probably plays with herself with a bobby pin.’ ‘What a great image,’ Lenny said. ‘Can I have that [for my comedy routine]?'” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 68]

Krassner notes the tenor of The Realist, the magazine he ran and founded: “Campus bookstores were banning The Realist. Students whose parents had burned their issues often wrote in for replacement copies, but I was publishing material that was bound to offend. For example, Madalyn Murray was a militant atheist who was challenging the constitutionality of compulsary Bible reading in pubic schools, and she concluded her article: ‘I feel that Jesus Christ is at most a myth, and if he wasn’t, the least he was, was a bastard, and that the Virgin Mary obviously played around as much as I did, and certainly I feel she would be capable of orgasm.'” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 50]

Krassner eventually moderated Playboy magazine’s “Playboy Panel.” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 60] Despite accepting the Feminist Party Media Workshop Award in 1974 [p. 228] as publisher of The Realist, he eventually became publisher of Larry Flynt’s Hustler pornography magazine. Krassner [with Hustler editor Bruce David] presided over a controversial Hustler cover that shows “a woman’s body being stuffed into a meat grinder upside, down, so that only her legs were still showing … The cover was destined to become an unofficial symbol of male oppression at feminist rallies. In fact, when I attended a feminist conference with an old friend, Jane Bode — whose book on rape, Fighting Back, had just been published — she asked me to walk in separately from her and we would meet later … [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 246] … My main editorial regret [as publisher at Hustler] was that I hadn’t been able to publish that ‘Jesus and the Adulteress’ photo spread. The nearly life-size poster which was supposed to be included as a pull-out centerfold would instead remain on my wall as a memento of those six months at Hustler. There was Jesus, a generic barbershop-calendar Jesus, looking reverently toward the sky as he covered up the prone Adulteress. Her head was bleeding from stones that had been cast upon her. And she was showing pink. Sweet, shocking, vulneable pink … Although Hustler had been accused of exploiting women, actually it was guilty of exploiting men’s addiction to pornography.” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 250]

Among the many articles Krassner oversaw during his time at Hustler was Marilyn Katz’s “abortion rights” discussion. “In another building a few blocks away, [his own] The Realist shared offices with Flynt’s conspiracy researchers, Mark Lane and Donald Freed.” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 239, 240]

In the early years of the twentieth century, warring against Victorian era morality, Jewish “anarchist Emma Goldman also fostered a new permissiveness; she toured the country, lecturing on subjects as ‘The Limitation of Offspring’ and “Is Man a Varietiest or a Monogamist?’ She challenged feminists who advanced chastity, insisting that liberated women faced more danger from too little sexual experience than they did from too much.” [LEIDER, E.M., p. 49] In the early 1890s, Goldman “became the lover of [Alexander] Berkman and after a while, of his artist friend, Fedya, as well. The three lived communally… Even certain radicals found Emma’s honesty on matters of sex hard to tolerate.” [SHULMAN, A., 1970, p. 10, 11] Goldman even once attempted to work as a prostitute to raise the money to buy a gun for an assassination. [SHULMAN, A., 1970, p. 10]
   
Speaking of prostitutes, perhaps the most influential as the most “famous prostitute in the world” is Xaviera Hollander, whose 1971 book The Happy Hooker was a best-seller. (Hollander’s “first fiance’s name was Frank Apfelbaum … he transformed himself into Frank Allen.”) [HOLLANDER, X., 2000, p. 39] A daughter of a Holocaust survivor/Dutch psychiatrist, it was her father “who instilled in her a love of Yiddishkeit and a passion for Jewish culture.” “She began running a high-end brothel out of a brownstone on the Upper East Side,” notes the Jewish ethnic magazine, Moment,

     “where her clients included a man who asked a lot of questions, soon arousing
     Hollander’s suspicion. The man turned out to be Eric Kohn, a Jewish journalist
     researching a book. The two decided to collaborate on an autobiographical
     account of Hollander’s life, and one year later The Happy Hooker exploded onto the
     the scene — eventually selling 16 million copies … Addicted to diet pills and unable
     to control her kleptomania (‘I got orgasms from stealing,’ she says), she was
     arrested for stealing a $40 nightgown. That theft, coupled with the fact that she was
     a confessed crinial in the States, led her to eventual deportation and divorce …
     Businessman Arnold Blitz, a friend of Hollander’s, has this to say: ‘Xaviera
     is not an ambassador for Jewish culture — but for Jewishness.” [LIPKIN, L.,
     FEB 2001]

In 1924, two eighteen-year-old men from very affluent families in Chicago, Nathan Leopold and “his friend and lover Richard Loeb,” made international news for what was then popularized by its sensationalism as the “crime of the century.” Psychiatrist David Abrahamsen notes that the men

     “kidnapped fourteen-year old Bobby Franks, and Loeb beat him to death. They
      stripped the body from the waist down, and although the evidence is inconclusive,
      one or both of them probably performed a sexual act on it … In the perspective
      of all that has happend since the 1920s, the murder of Bobby Franks hardly
      qualifies as the crime of the century, as it was seen then. But at that time the brutality
       and senselessness of the act exploded like a bomb in the public consciousness. People
      began to realize that society was changing in some frightening way. The youth
      of the two murderers (this was the beginning of the tidal wave that came to be
      called juvenile delinquency), the sexual undercurrent of their crime and the fact
      that theirs was the first major trial to use the testimony of psychiatrists on
      the background and state of mind of a defendant made an indelible
      impression on the millions who followed the sensational case in the newspapers.”
      [ABRAHAMSEN, D., 1983, p. 41-42]

In 1997, the Jewish Bulletin of Northern California even featured an article about the early 20th-century German Jewish medical doctor, Magnus Hirschfeld, an

     “openly gay sexologist, who founded a famed Berlin institute that studied sexual
     behavior and sold sex aids in its gift shop, [and] embodied the Nazi’s most-despised
      attributes … [The] founding of Hirschfeld’s Scientific-Humanitarian Committee [is]
     believed to be the first organization devoted to the legal rights of homosexuals and
     other sexual minorities … ‘In a sense, he was the founder of gay liberation as a kind of
     political, legal movement,’ [says Jewish scholar David] Biale, ‘He’s a very
     important figure in gay history’ …In 1919 … Hirschfeld established his Institute
     and Museum of Sexology. A former mansion was divided into consulting offices,
     study rooms, laboratories and a large museum devoted to every aspect of human
     sexuality, especially the ‘Derangements of the Sexual Instinct’ … [Some visitors]
     left accounts of the strange exhibits and vast array of erotic artifacts and aphrodisiacs
     found in one of Berlin’s most curious atttractions. The institute was one of the first
     cultural organizations liquidated by the Nazis, who destroyed the building and its
      contents.” [KATZ, L., 6-6-97]

Rabbi Daniel Lapin notes fashion designer Rudi Gernreich’s influence in America in the 1960s:
 
     “When Rudi Gernreich, a Jewish socialist from Vienna, settled in Los
     Angeles and foisted the topless bathing suit on a shocked America,
     it seemed titillating and daring. Many will recall the newspaper
     photographs of grim-faced policemen clutching towels around the
     shapely torsos of giddy young women while escorting them off
     public beaches … A few hailed the flagrantly homosexual Gernreich
     as the hero of the avant-garde.” [LAPIN, D., 1999, p. 2]    

Such Jewish influence is common in popular culture. In 1995 Jewish fashion media mogul Calvin Klein came under fire by critics who compared his clothing “ads to child pornography.” [GIROUX, p. 16-17] The Israeli Nakash brother, who own the Jordache jeans company, pushed daring new levels of “lewd” imagery in their own ad campaign. [BYRON, p. 34-35] The Jewish Bulletin had a feature on famous Jewish homosexual fashion mogul Isaac Mizrahi in 1998:

     “Viewers saw little-known sides of Mizrahi in ‘Unzipped,’ the 1995 documentary
      about him. Filmmaker Douglas Keeve was, at the time, in a relationship with the
      designer. In one scene, Mizrahi put a sheer scrim behind the catwalk and had
      models change their outfits in full view of the audience. That kind of chutzpah
      gave viewers insight into his bold personality … ‘To this day the designer
      remains active in Jewish charities. ‘I do what I can,’ he says. ‘I’m a zealot, a
      real lover of the Jewish faith.” [SCHLEIER, C., 1-2-98]

Then there is Jewish fashion photographer Helmut Newton. “It is impossible to deny the impact he has made,” noted England’s The Independent in 2001,
   
      “on fashion photography in particular … To radical feminists, Newton is the
      antichrist. This is the man who photographed a woman on all fours with a saddle
      on her back, and another sitting on her underwear or an unmade bed, with a gun
      in her mouth … Newton’s vision is fuelled by sex, status, power and, above all,
      voyeurism … Small wonder, then, that much of the photographer’s most successful
      imagery has become far more famous than the garments he has chosen
      to photograph … Newton’s influence is everywhere … In the Sixties and Seventies,
      Newton’s decadent vision may have been labelled ‘porno chic,’ but today the rest
      of the world has finally caught up with him and it’s just plain chic. There is
      barely a stylist, photographer or designer working in fashion today who can
      fail to acknowledge Newton as an influence … Helmut Newton was born to      
      middle-class  Jewish parents in Weimar Berlin in 1920, and the decadent spirit of that
       place at that time is imprinted on his work … Accusations of misogyny are still
       constantly made against Newton’s work.” [FRANKEL, S., 5-9-01]

In 2001 Rabbi Ira Korff complained that “the suggestiveness in the media these days is increasingly irresponsible — it’s really pornography — and its been bothering me more and more.” Korff should know what he’s talking about. He is the former president of National Amusements Inc., which owns Viacom, the second-largest media conglommerate on earth (controlled by Jewish mogul Sumner Redstone). “Korff,” notes the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, “says the worst purveyor of violence and profanity on TV is Music Television (MTV,) which is owned by Viacom. But he adds, ‘I have no interest in attacking Viacom, and MTV is an ethically run business.’ After all, much of his own wealth was made while serving as president and later consultant to National Amusements Inc.” [HAUSMAN, T., 6-22-01]

Arnold Shaw notes some 1960s-era New York Jewish influence in the rock music world:

     “The Fugs, a New York city group led by Tuli Kuperberg and Ed Sanders, are
     generally regarded as the first underground group. Political and pornographic …
     they worked at shocking and repelling … They received virtually no airplay, since
     disk jockeys woried that the pronunciation of their name would be offensive.
     Although appearances frequently prompted people to walk out on them,
     they did secure a recording contract … [including Golden Filth] … With a
     name taken from a pornographic paperback, the Velvet Underground helped
     make underground Rock largely a New York phenomenon. Led by Lou Reed
     [also Jewish] (b. early 1940), the group became part of Andy Warhol’s
     Exploding Plastic Inevitable, a multimedia show, in 1966. The subject of Reed’s
     songs eliminated airplay for the records they made: heroin, in ‘I’m Waiting
     for the Man’; cocaine, in ‘Run, Run, Run’; sado-masochism, in ‘Venus in Furs’;
     and transvestitism, lesbianism, and homosexuality in other songs.” [SHAW, A.,
     1982, p. 396]

From France, singer Sergio Gainsbourg [born Lucien Ginzburg]

     “is still most famous in Britain for his number one ‘Je t’aime moi non plus‘: the
     scandalous anthem which was in the British charts 30 years ago. He and
     [actress Jane] Birkin simulated their lovemaking so effectively that the
     single was banned by the BBC and formally condemned by the Vatican
     …Yet Gainsbourg is the greatest popular musician France has ever produced …
     Echoes ofhis favourite technique, of murmuring profanities against
     a delicate and beautiful harmony, can be heard in many contemporary
     records, not least the later work of Leonard Cohen … Towards the end of his
     life, the singer’s media apparances beame ritual provocations: in one
     television broadcast, he subjected a veteran paratrooper — horrified
     by Gainsbourg’s dub version of the Marseillaise — to a torrent of
     obscenities, pausing only occasionally, to inflate condoms. On another notorious
     live show, sharing a platform with a young Whitney Houston, Gainsbourg,
     then 58, turned to the presenter Michel Drucker and declared, in English,
     ‘I want to fuck her.'” [CHALMERS, R., 1-4-00]

“The rest of the country,” once joked Jewish comedian Woody Allen, “thinks of us [New Yorkers] as homosexual Jewish communist pornographers. I think of us that way, and I live here.” [BROWN, A., 11-2-97] When Jewish White House intern Monica Lewinsky became sexually involved with President Bill Clinton, she shared the following joke to him: “Why do Jewish men like to watch pornos backwards? So that they can watch the prostitute give back the money.” [FORWARD, 10-23-98, p. 1] “I’m such a sex machine,” begins controverial radio talk show host Howard Stern’s autobiography, ” I could take a piece of wood and turn it into something erotic, something sensual, something perverse.” [STERN, H., 1995, p. 3]

Despite Jewish pre-eminence in the porno world, it’s not kosher to face this issue squarely. So how did feminist Susan Griffin examine — like so many – the issue of Jews and pornography, in her 1981 book Pornography and Silence? She didn’t mention them at all, except as a forum for railing at length about Jews as victims of “anti-Semitic” stereotypes, and forcing a link between sexual pornography and anti-Jewish hostility (both from the same reservoirs of sick minds). “And yet it is precisely because of the madness of the anti-Semitic or pornographic idea,” she declares,

     “and precisely because it is a delusion, that it must assault reality and try to
      change it. A man ‘believes’ in anti-Semitic propaganda, or the pornographic
      ideology, because the illness of his mind REQUIRES that he believe these ideas
      to be true. Yet illness is of its very nature resistant. Thus, when a madman is
      told that he does not see the world correctly, and when he is given evidence
      against his prejudices, he will refuse to see the truth, and he will even distort this
       evidence to support his own delusion. But most significantly, he will even change
       reality so it supports his mad idea of the world. This is what anti-Semitism and
       pornography requires of their believers. THE DELUDED MIND MUST TRY TO
      REMAKE THE WORLD AFTER AN ILLUSION.” [author’s emphasis] [GRIFFIN,
       S., 1981, p. 121]

Griffin has more to say about this subject, using the innocense of Jews as an attack upon the pornographic (anti-Semitic) mind:

      “The same mind [of Adolf Hitler] that dreamed of itself as the bearer of culture
       conceived that its nemesis, the destroyer of culture, was the Jew. As a shadow
      to the fantasy of Aryan dominance, the anti-Semite invented an enemy of awesome
       proportions. In the fabricated document known as ‘The Protocols of the Elders of
       Zion,’ the anti-Semite imagined a congregation of Jews who meet in a cemetery to
      plan the death of Aryan culture. Of course, a pornographic image lies at the center
      of this imagined plan. Thus the imagined Jews in the imagined cemetery contrive a
       lurid plot to ‘demand marriage between Jews and Christians.’ Together they enjoy the
       idea of defiling Gentile women. And as the meeting adjourns, a huge and shapeless
       golden calf emerges from the tomb to symbolize the materiality of the Jew, just as
      the fear of matter and mortality have emerged from the mind the anti-Semite in this
       fantasy of evil power.” [GRIFFIN, S., 1981, p. 175]

Even Judy Blume, a well-known Jewish writer of children’s books, is “routinely” listed among America’s “most censored U.S. authors” for testing moral boundaries. Outraged parents continually raise complaint. In 1997 alone, there were nine efforts to take her books for children off library shelves, particularly for undercurrent sexual themes. Blume’s juvenile book Deenie, for example, addresses masturbation, and Forever includes a penis named Ralph. [WOULFE, M., 7-20-98; JENKINS, E., 4-13-99, p. 134] Famous Jewish novelist Judith Krantz notes that “My most famous piece [while a writer for Cosmopolitan], about which I’m still asked, was called ‘The Myth of Multiple the Orgasm,’ inspired by a book by a general practitioner Dr. Rubin, who insisted that any woman who settled for less than fifty orgasms during a single sexual session was being cheated.” [KRANTZ, J., 2000, p. 236]

How about Willie Hammerstein’s influence upon popular culture? As Marybeth Hamilton notes, by 1913, his Victoria Theatre
 
      “became New York’s top-grossing vaudeville playhouse, renowned
      (or notorious) for its garish attractions — in Hammerstein’s phrase,
      for its ‘freak acts’ … [Siamese twins, etc.] … But more compelling
      than these physical and geographical oddities were the freaks of
      publicity, the city’s most notorious inhabitants, men and more
      frequently women who had made names for themselves through
      their links to New York’s criminal and sexual underworld, in headline-
      grabbing vice raids, ‘Love Nest,’ scandals, and murders … The emphasis
      was on sexual scandals, especially those featuring young, attractive
      women.” [HAMILTON, M., 1995, p. 3]
 
Exploiting their notoriety, Hammerstein hired such people from real-life, sensational news items to appear at his forum as performers.

What about Anton LeVay’s influence upon modern morals, particularly in attracting alienated youth? LeVay, born Howard Stanton Levey, and known as the “Black Pope,” founded the Church of Satan in San Francisco in 1966 and was bathed with media attention. Creating a web of lies about himself, “‘he has constructed,’ noted one reporter, ‘a personal history untruthful in every fact that can be verified.'” [GRACE, K., 7-28-97] “‘His Satanist’s Bible’ (1967) proposed a sub-Nietschean philosophy wherein might equals right, and immediate self-gratification constitutes the chief duty of man. ‘Be simply animal man,’ the Satanist’s Bible instructs, ‘hate your enemies, and if someone smites you, smash him … Susie Atkins, one of [Charles] Manson’s knife-wielding groupies, blames La Vey for her descent into depravity and murder.” [DAILY TELEGRAPH, 11-11-97, p. 25] More than a million copies of Levey’s books have been printed. [LOS ANGELES TIMES, 11-8-97, p. 8]

LeVay, who died in 1997, notes the Church of Satan’s web site, was “a self-loathing man of Jewish descent who embraced fascism toward the end of his life.” [CHURCH OF SATAN/1] His own daughter, Zeena, notes that he “routinely beat and abused those of his female disciples with whom he had sex, forcing them into prostitution as part of his ‘Satanic counseling’ and collected their earnings. In 1986 [Levey] was a passsive witness to the sexual molestation of his own grandson by a long time friend.” [CHURCH OF SATAN/2]

The traditional Jewish animosity towards Christianity is reflected by Levey in almost cartoon form. Levey’s Church of Satan teachings are of course antithetical to those of Christianity. “Behold the crucifix,” wrote Levey, “what does it symbolize? Pallid incompetence hanging on a tree … [Levey’s book] advocates ritual masturbation, rites ‘to summon one for lustful purposes or establish a sexually gratifying situation,’ as well as rites ‘to cause the destruction of an enemy'” [HARPUR, T., 3-5-97, p. A7] “For more than a decade,” notes the St. Louis Post Dispatch, in evaluating Levey’s influence,

     “scholars have noted a growing interest in Christianity’s archenemy of goodness.
      The Reverend Richard Woods, a Dominican who relates theoogy to popular
      culture, traces the upward curve [of interest in Satanism] from 1966, the year
      that Anton LaVey’s Church of Satan made its debut in San Francisco. The
      same year brought the release of Rosemary’s Baby, Ira Levine’s movie about
      about a woman who gave birth to the devils’ child. In the early 1970s, the book
      and movie ‘The Exorcist’ titillated millions.” [The film The Exorcist was
      directed by William Friedkin, also Jewish]. “[SCHJAEFFER, P., 2-5-89]

Seminal too, of course, to Luke Ford’s overview of those that have shaped modern sexual mores in western society is Sigmund Freud, from which so many sexual populists stem.  Feminist Kate Millet, in Sexual Politics, noted Freudianism’s “penis envy” and its other oppressive theories as profoundly detrimental to women:
 
      “Although generally accepted as a prototype of the liberal urge
      toward sexual freedom, and a signal contributor toward softening
      traditional puritanical inhibitions upon sexuality, the effect of Freud’s
      work, that of his followers, and still more that of his populizers, was
      to rationalize the invidious relationship between the sexes … And as
      regards the sexual revolution’s goal of liberating female humanity from
      its traditional subordination, the Freudian position came to be pressed
      into the service of a strong counterrevolutionary attitude.” [MILLET, p.
      178]

As Earl Grollman has observed:

     “Although [Sigmund] Freud was considered a non-believer [of Judaism] and even
      stated his disavowals of the rituals and rites, he did feel that he retained the best
      attributes of the faith. Numerous biographers noted that his home life was warm and
             loving, that learning occupied and extremely high priority and that he had a strong
      feeling of identification with other Jews. Even his doctrine concerning the powerful
      drive of sexual urges grew out of Freud’s interpretation of the basic ingredients of
       Jewishness.” [Grollman, E., 1965, p. xxv]

In 2001, the Jewish Bulletin noted the case of Rabbi Leslie Alexander who

     “has made it her mission to turn Jews on … ‘Judaism is about giving pleasure
     to one another and having no qualms or inhibitions about it … When a Jew goes
     before God, they are going to have to answer for every pleasure they didn’t take
     We, as American Jews, are saddled with a Christian sexual perspective which
     doesn’t at all reflect Jewish ideas. We have all this moral baggage about who we are
      sexually; none of that is Jewish … We spend so muuc time as a society trying to
     free ourselves from sexual mores. If we had just learned from our own tradition, we
     wouldn’t have to try …The Jewish texts are very blunt and direct [about sex] …
      Teaching it is lots of fun. My students usually say, ‘Whoa! They really said that?”
      [GOLDSMITH, A., 11-23-01]

“Alexander,” notes the Bulletin,     “remembered once reading a text in which a rabbi is telling a group of other
      rabbis about the various things he would consider sexual perversions. ‘And
      then, at the end of his speech the rest of the rabbis told him he was wrong’ ….
      In addition to loving the ‘racy’ nature of the subject, Alexander enjoyed teaching
      about Jewish sexuality because it’s a way to pique people’s interest in Judaism.”
      [GOLDSMITH, A., 11-23-01

Profoundly influential, of course, in shaping popular morality is the behind-the-scenes world of mainstream Hollywood:  “Show people had always been careless about morals, and in a town, in an industry, dedicated to peddling glamour and romance, it would be surprising if the passions enacted before the cameras did not sometimes carry over into real life … Youngsters pouring into Los Angeles, desperate for a movie career, were prepared to risk the perils of the casting couch.” [SHIPMAN, D. 1993, p. 136] As noted earlier, the “casting couch” has long been an institution in Hollywood. In crudest form, the results of such sexual expansion inevitably include the likes of famed Jewish Hollywood “madam” Heidi Fleiss and her much-publicized Hollywood drug and prostitution ring in the early 1990s. The ring reportedly included Columbia executives Michael Nathanson and Barry Josephson as important players. [See earlier discussion] William Stadiem notes the Hollywood Jewish prostitute contingent within the genral stable of non-Jewish madam “Alex Adams”:

     “Robin was part of an entire group of young privileged hookers Alex had dubbed
     ‘the JAP [Jewish American Princess] Pack.’ They loved nightclubs, Porsches,
     Versace, and coke, mostly went to UCLA on and off, hated the idea of working
     at a real job, and could only soak their parents for so much.”] ADAMS, A., 1993,
     p. 55]

 
Hollywood’s “Sin City” entertainment playground, Las Vegas, especially renowned for gambling, prostitution and other vices, must also be added to the list of great questionable Jewish influences upon popular culture. (In Hollywood, Al and Lew Wertheimer founded an illegal gambling den in Hollywood called the Clover Club. The Jewish Hollywood crowd later set up such a resort near Tijuana, Mexico, called Agua Caliente.) [GABLER, N., 1988, p. 261] Las Vegas, as an institution, has been profoundly influential in its efforts to sanitize, normalize, and popularize some of the most troubling expressions of human nature as acceptable recreation in western society. As professor Alan Balboni observes, “The Jews and Italians who made up ‘the Boys’ [the Mafia] were able to develop the burgeoning gaming industry to the point where it eventually became a significant influence on the American scene.” [BALBONI, p. ix] Jewish entrepreneurship was not alone in this, but it was central. [See earlier information about the huge Jewish influence in the formation of Las Vegas] For purposes here, we may wonder about the observations of Jewish commentator James Yaffe: “If Jews can be said to have a characteristic vice, that vice is gambling. Even back in the shtetl they were gamblers. Many psychiatrists have mentioned this phenomena to me, yet nobody has been able to explain it exactly.” [YAFFE, J., 1968, p. 268] We may also note the case of Mike Rose, the Jewish CEO of Holiday Corporation (Holiday Inn, et al), who “steered [the company] into gambling when it bought into Harrah’s in 1980, causing Holiday’s president and two directors to resign. Rose later sold the namesake motel chain to create a gambling concern called the Promus Corporation.” The company’s president, L. M. Clyde, retired “because he could not reconcile his Presbyterian religious beliefs with gambling … Clyman did not go quietly, and two Holiday directors joined him in resigning on moral grounds.” [JOHNSTON, D., 1992, p. 49, photo section]
 
Across the earth, in 1998 conservative Israeli commentator Jonathan Rosenblum lamented the dubious moral status and reputation of the modern Jewish state:
 
     “Once again anti-Semites portrayed us as a sexual libertines and
     perverts to undermine our moral authority. Today we cheerfully
     admit the charges and imagine ourselves beloved by the world
     for it. Are we and our culture similarly honored when a CNN
     documentary claims that we have the highest rate of prostitution
     in the world?” [ROSENBLUM, J., 5-15-1998, p. 9]
 
Rosenbaum probably could not have imagined the grotesque defamation of the holiest of Jewish holies by young Israelis the next year. In 1999, a group of 40 Israeli teenagers visiting Auschwitz and other sites of Jewish mass extermination in Poland under the Nazis, garnered international outrage from Jewish communities when it was discovered that they had “ended a tour of Poland’s death camps with a strip show … only hours after visiting Treblinka, where 900,000 Jews were murdered … On a previous occasion, Israelis were shocked after a group of [Israeli] army officers went to a casino after visiting Auschwitz.” [GROSS, T., 11-28-99]

In 2001, a Jewish community in England made the news when a “stag night with three strippers performing ‘sexually explicit acts'” was held at a synagogue (Finchley Synagogue’s Kinloss Suite) … Some of the funds raised was supposed to be for a Jewish charity. [ZERDIN, J., 2-9-01]

 
Jewish American feminist Andrea Dworkin notes her disillusionment with her liberation myths about Israel when she first visited the Jewish state:
 
      “In 1988 I went to Israel … I was distressed by what I found, including
      Holocaust-themed pornography and battered and raped women. Why
      would I expect it to be different? … In Israel there is a genre of
      pornography defined by the theme of the Holocaust: women’s
      bodies in pieces run down by trains or skeletal standing by open
      ovens.” [DWORKIN, A., 2000, p. xi, 168]

Jewish American Paul Cowan noted this anecdote about looking for his Jewish identity in Israel in 1982:

     “I had an enemy in Beersheba, a man named Itzhak, the city’s leading stud.
     He’d been a gigolo on the French Riviera, had run drugs from Israel to Syria,
     and now owned his own bar, a place called the Barsheba, where you could often
     find the sort of brawls that seemed so exciting in American Westerns. He was
     always stealing women. I had a particular grudge against him because he had
     seduced Pam, an Englishwoman I was dating, made her a hostess at his bar,
     and had then become her part-time pimp.” [COWAN, P., 1982, p. 108]
     [See also “White Slavery” chapter]In 2001, Israel’s state-run television station elicited outrage from women’s groups when it broadcast “a video clip of an attacker beating a naked woman whom he had allegedly raped … The president of the Na’amat women’s organization … said in a a letter .. that she hoped [the station would not] compete for ratings through the use of violence and pornography.” [HAAS, D., 2-16-01, p. 2] In 2000, the Egyptian newspaper Al-Arabi claimed that “film producers [in Israel] are tracking down actors who look like current Egyptian stars, and using them to shoot porn flicks in Israel. The films are then imported to Egypt and sctreened for paying customers … [Film actress] Yusra Alawi told reporters she is asking her attorney to obtain copies of the films and to pursue legal action against those reponsible.” [BOULWARE, J., 6-7-00]

The Jewish state was also severely embarrassed by a July 2000 incident in South America that engendered “huge play in the Brazilian media.” Israeli diplomat Arie Scher was implicated in the production of child pornography when Brazilian police discovered videos and photographs in Hebrew teacher George Steinberg’s home. [NIGRI, S., 7-5-2000] Scher fled to Israel before he could be arrested by Brazilian police. (In 2000, the Sydney Morning Herald reported that South Africa was “one of the world’s worst centres for child abuse and child sex slavery … International crime syndicates based in Nigeria, China, Israel, and Russia have become involved in the South African trade.”) [O’LOUGHLIN, 9-9-2000]
 
(On the continued theme of child pornography, in 1996, David Webber, former director of the Calgary Jewish Community Council and Youth Director of Beth Israel Synagogue, was sentenced to six years in prison “for possessing child pornography and molesting seven boys over the past eight years.” Police found in his possession 3,635 photos of young boys, 16 pornography videos, 224 books and articles about “man-boy love,” and other indicting materials. The provincial prosecutor called Webber an “unrepentant pedophile.” [SLADE, D., 10-26-96, p. B5] In 1997, across Canada in Nova Scotia, Stuart Friedman, the cantor at Halifax’s Orthodox Beth Israel synagogue was “convicted and sent back to the United States [to his native Baltimore] for possessing and distributing child pornography … one of the biggest [news] stories to hit Halifax in a long time.”  [CANADIAN JEWISH NEWS, 2-6-97, p. 10] Police found a range of pornographic materials, including sets of handcuffs. In yet another child pornography case in Canada, in 1994 Corey Jones, a professional sex offender rehabilitation counselor,” wrote that “My head hangs in despair … when I read of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association coming to the defense of Eli Langer, an artist charged under the new law against child pornography because of an exhibition of paintings which depict children in various sex acts with other children and adults.” Langer, arrested at the Mercer Union Gallery, is also Jewish; “his father is an amateur Holocaust historian.”) [JONES, C., 1-20, 1994, p. A21; TORONTO LIFE, 7/1994]
 
In the world of American pornography, particularly the film-making side, Luke Ford observes that
 
     “Though only 2 percent of the American population, Jews dominate
     porn. Most of the leading male performers through the 1980s
     had Jewish parents. Leading Jewish pornographers include Wesley
     Emerson, Paul Fishbein, Lenny Friedlander, Paul Norman, Bobby
     Hollander, Rubin Gottesman, Hank Weinstein, Fred Hirsch and
     his children Steve and Marjorie, Steve Orenstein, Theodore
     Rothstein, and Reuben Sturman.” [FORD, p. 21]

At his Internet web site, Ford elaborates in a section entitled Jews. “Secular Jews,” he writes,

     “play a disproportionate role throughout the sex industry … Leading modern
     Jewish pornographers include Ron Braverman, John Bone, Wesley Emerson,
     Paul Fishbein, Herbert Feinberg AKA Mickey Fine, Hank Weinstein, Lenny
     Friedlander, Bobby Hollander, Rubin Gottesman, Fred Hirsch and his
     children Steve and Marci, Paul ‘Norman’ Apstein, Steve Orenstein, Jack
     Richmond (Legend CEO), Theodore Rothstein, Reuben and David
     Sturman, Ron Sullivan, Jerome Tanner, Armand Weston, Sam and
     Mitch (Spinelli). Jews accounted for most of the leading male performers of
     1970s and ’80s. Hebrew studs include Buck Adams, Bobby Astyr (Bobby
     Charles), R. Bolla (Robert Kerman), Jerry Butler (Paul Siderman),
     Seymore Butts (Adam Glasser), Roger Caine (Al Levitsky), David
     Christopher (Bernie Cohen), Steve Drake, Jesse Eastern, Jamie
     Gillis (Jamie Gurman), Ron Jeremy (Hyatt), Michael Knight, William
     Margold, Ashley Moore (Steve Tucker), David Morris, George Payne,
     Ed Powers (Mark Arnold aka Mark Krinski), Harry Reems (Herbertg
     Streicher), David Ruby, Herschel Savage (Harvey Cowen), Carter
     Stevens (Mal Warub), Marc Stevens, Paul Thomas (Phil Tobias), Marc
     Wallice (Marc Goldberg) Randy West (Andy Abrams) and Jack
     Wrangler … Jewish female performers include Avalon, Jenny Baxter
     (Jenny Wexler), Busty Belle (Tracy Praeger), Chelsea Blake, Tiffany Blake,
     Bunny Bleu (Kim Warner), J. R. Carrington, Lee Carroll (Leslie Barris),
     Blair Castle/Brookle Fields (Allison Shandibal), Courtney/Natasha/Eden
     (Natasha Zimmerman), Daphne (Daphne Franks), Barbara Dare (Stacy
     Mitnick), April Diamond, Jeana Fine, Alexis Gold, Terri Hall, Heather
     Hart, Nina Hartley (Hartman), C. J. Laing (Wendy Miller), Frankie
     Leigh (Cynthia Hope Geller), Gloria Leonard, Traci Lords (Nora Louise
     Kuzma), Amber Lynn, Tonisha Mills, Melissa Monete, Susan Nero,
     Scarlett O. (Catherine Goldberg), Tawny Pearl (Susan Pearlman), Nine
     Preta, Tracey Prince, Raylene, Janey Robbins (Robin Lieberman), Mila
     Shegol, Alexandra Silk, Susan Sloan, Annie Sprinkle (Ellen Steinberg),
     Karen Summer (Dana Alper), Cindy West, Zara Whites (Amy Koolman),
     and Ona Zee (Ona Simms) … Why do Jews dominate porn?” [lukeford.com]

“[Jewish] pornographer Seymour Butts,” says Ford,

     “attributes the large number of Jews in porn to the desire for profits. Jews
     gravitate towards money … If four people compete for a job, and three of them
     are goyim [non-Jews], the Jew, all things being equal, will get the job.
     That’s the way I work. If I’ve got three actors going for a part, and one
     of them is Jewish, and they’re all in the same ball park … sue me.” [lukeford.com]

(Note: As the parameters of what constitutes “morality’ shifts wider decade by decade, any definition of pornography constitutes a controversial subject. On today’s terms, pornography, to this author’s sensibilities, is not the public depiction of sexuality itself, but rather the exploitation, debasement, robbing of dignity, devaluation and even ruthless dehumanization of the most intimate of human connections: frail emotions, human weakness, vulnerability, and the act of love and intimate human tenderness despoiled for public entrepreneurial profit).

 
Among the most important Jewish porn performers of all, is Harry Reems (real name: Harry Streicher). Reems, notes omnipresent lawyer Alan Dershowitz, was “a nice Jewish boy making his living by doing what lots of people would pay to do … [He was] the undisputed king of the porno actors.” [DERSHOWITZ, 1987, p. 156, 155] Dershowitz knows Reems’ story well because he successfully defended the actor against obscenity-related charges in Memphis. “If Herb Streicher had not become an actor,” notes the lawyer, “he would have been a first-rate press agent. Every time a story [supportive of his case] appeared, he placed it in his press kit and sent copies to other journalists. This had a snowball effect … It was impossible to pick up a newspaper or magazine or turn on a TV or radio talk show without coming across some reference to the Reems case. Reems had become an overnight celebrity.” [DERSHOWITZ, 1987, p. 171] Dershowitz even attracted the ire of feminist and other outraged groups when he went to court to argue for a student showing at Harvard University of Reem’s best known movie, Deep Throat, (an early 1970s porno movie which grossed $60 million worldwide). [DERSHOWITZ, 1987, 184]
 
By the late 1980s, freedom fighter Dershowitz had a growing track record in such matters. Well before Harry Reems, he notes with pride that he “successfully defended the film I am Curious (Yellow) … [which was] made in Sweden. [It] had been [the] first commercially distributed motion picture to show explicit sex.” [DERSHOWITZ, 1987, p. 163]  He next was the lawyer for Terry Levene’s movie, Belinda. Levene was convicted of obscenity-related charges by a jury trial; Dershowitz won an appeal for him. [DERSHOWITZ, 1987, p. 176]
 
 In 1995, Nadine Strosse, a professor of law at New York University, even wrote a book entitled Defending Pornography. She defends herself as a champion of free speech with the usual “Jew as oppressed victim” credentialing:
 
     “My father was a Holocaust survivor. I am a Jew. I know from logic
     and from observation and from experience that the more powerless
     you are as a group, gender or ideology, the more you should defend
     your freedom of speech.” [GERRARD, N., 1-28-96, p. 15]Indeed, the very pardigm of the marginalized and popularly despised pornographer rests comfortably upon the Jewish “outsider/victim” model. Both Jew and pornographer commonly ascribe to themselves attributes of moral nobility against a perceived repressive society: in both cases the enemy is Christian culture/values where sexual expression has been traditionally devalued. In the porno context the enemy is configured as prudishness. The struggle of the Jew and pornographer is, in this world view, a struggle against oppression; both Jew and pornographer are declared to be innocent of moral wrongdoing. Their common goal is conceived merely as the struggle for freedom. This, and recent efforts in the (traditionally despised) pornographic world to reinvent itself as heroic is noted by Carina Chocano:

    “If sex in our culture were not so ‘steeped in shame and guilt’ they argue, and if
    the sex and pornography industry were not marginalized, then pornography would
    cease to reflect harmful attitudes, rear its had out of the gutter, and provide, as
    one of the panelists [at the First Annual World Pornography Conference] put
    it, ‘masturbatory catharsis for the masses.’ ‘That stuff is bullshit,’ retorted
    Glasgow Phillips, an author and critic [of pornography], ‘To make money in
    this business you have to exploit,’ he says,’ and it’s so easy to do. I mean,
    you are aware of how many dumb sluts there are in this town [Los Angeles]?
    You just cast them.” [CHOCANO, C., 1998]

Feminist Diana Russell angrily assailed Strossen’s Defending Pornography, saying:

     “Nadine Strossen’s objective in Defneind Photography is to destroy the
      reputation and achievements of the feminist movement against pornography.
      To this end, she dishes up the same tired old caricature of us as anti-sex
      prudes, pro-censorship, and in collustion with the right wing … Strossen’s
      book was enthusiastically feted by the media not because it’s so brilliant but
      because she’s president of the American Civil Liberties Union (an organization
      that has increasingly become a watchdog for the interests of pornogarphers).
      The fact that Strossen professes to be a feminist gives her a lot more clout
      than man would have doing the same dirty work for a dirty industry.” [RUSSSELL,
      D., SUMMER 1995]
  
There are apparently no limits to the reshaping of sexual morals. In 2001, Princeton professor Peter Singer (“son of Viennese Jews who escaped to Australia in 1938, shortly after Hitler’s invasion”) [NASAR, S., 4-10-00, p. A1] made national news, and national ridicule, for a book review he authored at an online magazine, Nerve. The title of the piece was Heavy Petting, where he endorsed bestiality, including lines like this: “Who has not been at a social occasion disrupted by the household dog gripping the legs of a visitor and vigorously rubbing his penis against them … In private, not everyone objects to being used by his dog in this way, and occasionally mutally satisfying activities may develop.” [BILLUP, A., 4-2-01] The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette featured a poignant editorial about Singer, an expert on “bioethics,”and the broad implications of such thoughts from the Ivy League college:

     “[Peter Singer is] a Princeton professor of bioethics who wants to know when the
     sexual revolution is gonna start revolting again. He’s ready to get it on with
     the animal kingdom … He was brought to Princeton with much fanfare by that
     university’s president, Harvey Shapiro, who also happens to head up the President’s
     National Bioethics Advisory Committee. Yep, these guys are shaping national
     policy. Ethical policy.” [ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE, 4-8-01, p. J4]

In 1999, Hope Weissman, another Jewish professor, this one at Wesleyan University in Connecticut, was attracting controversy for her class, “Pornography: Writing of Prostitutes.” The class featured readings from everything from the Marquis de Sade to Larry Flynt’s Hustler magazine, as well as a guest striptease performance by well-known Jewish pornographer-“performance artist” Annie Sprinkle, who gained notoriety for inviting art audiences to inspect her cervix. “Create your own work of pornography,” Weissman instructed her class. [PINKERTON, J., 5-20-99, p. B9] In 2001, after public protest Peter Lehman’s class “Sexuality in Media” was cancelled. The year before he had “required the students to sign a waiver before screening X-rated movies.” [ASSOCIATED PRRSS, PORN, 11-9-01]
 
Annie Sprinkle, born Ellen Steinberg, is “the Jewish porn star/performance artist,” [EPSTEIN, R., 10-15-99, p. 18] who is the veteran of so much sexual variety that she “stopped counting her own personal sexual encounters at 3,500.” [HELBER, A., 8-19-99] “When I went to [visit the former Nazi concentration camp] Dachau,” she once said, “I could see how tied in that was to sex.” “How so?” wondered her interviewer. “Well,” she continued,
 
     “I’m not clear enough at the moment to really say, but the quest was for
     power and the visceral quality, the bodies, the blood … I don’t know.
     It’s just too big to even try to explain, but it was just a sense I had of
     how truly tied in that was with a misdirected sexual energy … [There
     is] my Jewish tit print. I kind of like the idea of the heart and breast and
     the nurturing to the feeling and the nipple and the sensuality being used
     to create a religious symbol: a Jewish star. And it’s not that I’m poking
     fun or anything. I’m honoring both the breast and the Jewish star in my
     mind.” [FRIEDLANDER, M., 2000]

(In similar terms, Jewish scholar Michael Govrin describes the holiest of Jewish places: “Jerusalem, God’s bride, His place of desire, is always an erotic place of masculine desire. Jerusalem is the biggest harlot of all places, the world’s cunt exposed on all the television screens, in an ongoing peep show, day and night. And yet, in the classical paradox of desire, everyone has his Jerusalem virginal and pure, defiled only by the others’ abusive and defamatory biographies of her.”) [GOVRIN, M., 200]

In 1998, a conference on sexuality was held at the State University of New York at New Paltz; it was sponsored by the college’s women’s studies program. “What apparently must be called the highlight of the conference,” noted the Clarion,     “was the performance of [Jewish lesbian performer] Shelly Mars, a stripper from
     a bisexual bathhouse. During her performance, ‘Whiplash: Tales of a Tomboy,’
     which featured her simulating sex and screaming obscenities, Mars collided with
     the crotch of auddience member Peter Shipley, chairman of a private educational
     group called the National Catholic Forum. Shipley’s pen went into her nostril, and
     Mars fell back shouting that she was bleeding. Then she removed her pants and
     blouse and exposed herself.”[CLARION, FEB 1998]

Other prominent Jewish porno performers include Randy Becker (“steamy nude pinup boy for the gay community”) [GERSTEL, J., 5-22-97, p. B10] and Ron Jeremy. As one Canadian newspaper noted in 1999, “With 1,500 films to his credit over a 22-year career, Ron Jeremy is one of the most prolific and famous porn stars in the history of the business.” Jeremy describes himself as a “good Jewish boy” who started out as a schoolteacher with a Master’s degree in special education. [GRIWKOWSKY, F., 12-8-99, p. 38] (On a more modest scale, in 1994, a New York policewoman, Carol Shaya, “born in Israel to a Jewish father and Catholic mother,” made the news for posing nude in Playboy.) [HALL, A., 7-11-94, p. 2, 21]

In 1998, Rabbi Shmuel Boteach, although underscoring that he distances himself from pornography, even clocked in when an excerpt from his book, Kosher Sex, in Playboy magazine. [DAILY TELEGRAPH, 10-26-98, p. A9] In 2001, Boteach sued an Internet dating service, MatchNet.com, a firm he was commissioned to represent. Joe Shapira and Alon Carmel, founders of MatchNet.com, are Israelis, as is Ami Shafrir, another developmental partner in the Internet firm. However, “the heart of Shafrir’s business empire was another company with headquarters in the Wilshire Boulevard Building: Amtec Audiotext, an operator of telephone sex lines that he says generated revenue of $60 million in its best year, 1995.” Shafrir is also the landlord for MatchNet, in Beverly Hills. Matchnet divisions include Americansingles.com and Jdate, the latter of which “one of every 10 Jewish singles in the United States uses it and … the site has been responsible for 300 marriages in its four years of operation.” Rabbi Boteach was eventually approached by another Israeli, Daniel Nicherie, himself once convicted of bank fraud, who “who told the rabbi that Mr. Carmel and Mr. Shapira were pornographers who had been sued nearly 40 times.” “The intrigue [surrounding MatchNet.com],” noted the New York Times, “stretches from Beverly Hills to Israel to the German stock market. The characters include a phone sex entrepreneur, the former convict who took control of his business and a disbarred lawyer obsessed with exposing the underbelly of the online dating industry.” [ELLIN, A., 2001]

Then there is Gloria Leonard, also Jewish, past pornography actress, former president of the Adult Film and Video Association of America and president of the “Free Speech Coalition.” She notes that she “was at the cutting edge of a phenomenon known as ‘phone sex’ during my tenure as publisher of High Society magazine, which ultimately resulted in a landmark case fought in the United State Supreme Court, which we won.” [WASHINGTON TIMES, 10-12-99, p. A2] Ms. Leonard, promoted as “a name synonymous with quality adult entertainment of all kinds,” was once a “convertible bond specialist from Wall Street.” [LAFEE, S., 4-29-89, p. D2] In 2001, when she stepped down as president of the “Free Speech Coalition” (a largely porn activist group), she was replaced by “her long time friend and fellow Free Speech board member Mara Epstein. A veteran of the adult entertainment business, Epstein previously ran icandy Entertainment, a DVD producer, and was employed by Laserdisc Entertainment, the exclusive producer of XXX laserdiscs in the early 1990s.”
[ADULT VIDEO NEWS, JUNE 2001]
 
Elsewhere, Sandy Kane has, notes Jay Weissberg, “the raunchiest, most Jewish show on cable … Sandy bills herself as the world’s only stripper comic.” [WEISSBERG, J., 2000] Other noteworthy Jews in the porn field include Steve Greenberg, co-chair of the Committee on Male Sex Work at the 1997 International Prostitution Conference; Karlyn Lotney, producer of the “San Francisco-based erotic cabaret ‘In Bed with Fairy Butch'”; and Carol Leigh (“Scarlet Harlot”), head of the Prostitution Education Network, and founding member of the homosexual advocacy group, Act Up! “Being stigmatized for the way you’re earning money,” says Ms. Leigh, “is a way to persecute Jews, right?” [COHEN, B., 2000] Other prominent Jewish pornography performers/producers include Nina Hartley, Jerry Butler, Hershel Savage (Harvey Savage), Sam Weinstein (alias Armand Weston or Anthony Spinelli), and Paul Thomas. [JEWHOO, 2000]

Then there is Abby Ehmann who “pledges to meet the tastes of fetishist and spectators who come to her regular Saturday night party, Click + Drag at Club Mother” in New York City. She edits ‘Extreme Fetish” magazine, “dubbed the best alternative sex publication in New York by TimeOut magazine. She is on the board of directors of Feminists for Free Expression, an organization that fights restrictions on free speech, and she is a writer and a performer.” [KAKOULAS, M., 6-26-00]

Elsewhere, CNN notes the Gold family’s British-based Ann Summers sex shop chain “offers customers the opportunity to shop of lingerie and sex aids in their home homes [via meetings like Tupperware parties] … Chief Executive Jacqueline Gold may be responsible for Britain’s sexual revolution. The Ann Summers concept of targeting women was her brainchild … ‘We certainly have contributed to changing people’s attitudes to sex, certainly the women’s attitudes,’ she said.” [CNN, 9-10-98]

In his list of Jewish film pornographers, Luke Ford ascribes to Reuben Sturman the nomer “godfather of porn,” noting that “although not as well known as Playboy‘s Hugh Hefner, Hustler‘s Larry Flynt, and Penthouse‘s Bob Guccione, Sturman exerted far greater influence. One competitor complained that Sturman did not control the adult entertainment industry; he was the industry.” [FORD, p. 22] Sturman himself told the Los Angeles Times that “No one was anywhere near me [in the pornography business].” [JOHNSON, J., 5-31-95, p. B1]  “To expand his hold on the [pornography] industry,” noted the Times, “he produced films with one company, sex paraphernalia with another and then sold everything through his own stores.” By 1977 an FBI report declared that Sturman had accomplished “an almost total takeover” of the “peep-show industry.” [JOHNSON, J. p. B1] The San Diego Union-Tribune noted in 1991 that
 
     “in its 1986 report, the [U.S. government] Meese Commission on
     Pornography singled out Sturman as the administration’s top porn
     target. It identified him as the number one worldwide distributor of
     pornography, with financial control of nearly 200 businesses in
     19 states, one Canadian province, and six foreign countries.”
     [LAVELLE, P., 1991, p. B1]
 
(Ford cites figures of 800 Sturman adult bookstores in all American states and forty other countries). [FORD, p. 129]
 
Sturman was eventually worth an estimated $100 million. His main company, Sovereign News, noted the Los Angeles Times, was “based in a sprawling Cleveland warehouse which is cynically referred to by some lawmen as the Ft. Knox of pornography.” [HOUSTON, P., 1987,p. 20]
 
Sturman, son of Jewish Russian immigrants, depicted himself as a free speech crusader and evaded the law for most of his life. (Omnipresent Alan Dershowitz once defended his deeds, declaring that “the worst thing [Sturman] did was to turn feminists into censors.” [JOHNSON, J., 1995, p. B1]) The “Godfather of Porn” was finally sent to prison in 1992 for income tax evasion and interstate transportation of films that depicted “humans eating excrement, women having sex with horses, pigs, chickens and other animals, and acts of sadomasochism.” [LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, 10-29-97, p. B1] Ralph Levine, a former Sturman partner in a Las Vegas porno bookshop called Talk of the Town, (described by one newspaper as “a gaudy smut emporium on the eastern fringes of downtown Las Vegas”) [LAVELLE, P., 1991, p. B1] became a key government witness against him. Another Jewish co-defendant in the case, Stanley Loeb, “pleaded guilty to interstate transportation of obscene materials.” [LAVELLE, P., p. B1] Sturman was convicted in 1992 but escaped from a minimal security prison in the California desert that same year, was captured, and later convicted of further charges, including extortion. Another Jewish associate, Herbert Fineberg, was also convicted for the attempted murder of another porn shop owner. [FORD, p. 121-132] Another member of the porno chain, Allan Goelman, was convicted of income tax evasion of $270,000 in personal profits as head of Sturman’s “U.S. retail operations.” [HOUSTON, P., 1987, p. 20]
 
 “I was a businessman,” said Sturman once imprisoned, blandly explaining his activities, “I didn’t see [pornography] as good. I didn’t see it as bad. It was a product to be sold.”  [JOHNSON, J., 1995, p. B1]
 
More recently, in 1999 the Los Angeles Times called 26-year old Seth Warshavsky the “Bill Gates of Smut” and “the most infamous pornographer of the Internet Age.” [EHRMAN, M., 6-13-99, p. 26] He founded and heads Internet Entertainment Group (partner: Mark Cohn; Director of Sales and Marketing: Jonathan Silverman).  Divisions include Club Love, Manhole, Sex Fantasy, Girls Girls Girls, and many others. “Depending on who’s talking about him,” noted the Seattle Weekly,
 
     “[Warshavsky’s] either a genius, a misogynist, a respected global
     businessman, an exploiter of children, the Bill Gates of Porn, or the
     Larry Flynt of Cyberspace.” [ANDERSON, R., 2-11-99, p. 22]
 
The Seattle-based Warshavsky started out at age 17 with a phone sex business. By 1999 IEG had grossed $75 million in its first three years. Warshavsky had to park his Jaguar after his driving license was taken away — over 20 moving violations in five years. Warshavsky has been accused of choking a girlfriend in a limousine, “stalking” her, and threatening her former boyfriend. [ANDERSON, R., 2-11-99, p. 22]
 
In 1999 IEG garnered Catholic outrage and a subsequent lawsuit from the Archdiocese of St. Louis. “IEG recently linked its sites to others that carries news of Pope John Paul II’s visit a couple of weeks ago to St. Louis,” noted the Seattle Weekly, “To make sure Catholics were properly horrified, IEG included an account of papal sex scandals and dirty religious jokes.” [Anderson, R., 2-11-99, p. 22] The Archdiocese won a court injunction against IEG’s use of the term “papal visit” as a name for one of its websites, a strategy intended to lure the religious to porno that also defamed and ridiculed the Catholic faith. “This was an absurd ruling,” declared Warshavsky about the court’s decision, “This is a prime example of how the Church has been able to use the legal system to suppress free speech.” [SALTER, J., 1-21-99]  (Similarly, in 2001, computer hackers commandeered the militant Muslim Palestinian group Hamas’s web site. Visitors to the Hamas home page were subjected to hard-core pornography images that could not be quickly clicked away. Outraged Hamas officials blamed Israelis for the violation.) [FREE REPUBLIC/REUTERS, 3-26-01]
 
In August 2000, NBC’s online news site featured an article entitled “The Sultans of Smut.” The aforementioned Seth Warshawsky and Jonathan Silverstein (by now president of Cybererotica, whose founder and chief is Ron Levi) made a list of ten of “the influential players in the business [pornography] that built the Internet.” Another “player” was Bill Asher, “president of Vivid Entertainment Group, the “world’s leading producer of adult films and videos.” VEG was founded by Steven Hirsch and David James. VEG also owns Hot Network, “considered the largest hard core adult television network in the country.” [BLANKSTEIN, A., 7-1-2000, p. C1] Other Jewish surnames on the list of ten “Sultans” included (Danni) Ashe, who founded “one of the best known adult sites on the web,” (Eric) Langen, and (David) Marshlack whose company gained fame by charging a fee for computer users to ask O.J. Simpson a question on the Internet, and setting up cameras that followed a group of co-eds at all moments throughout their private lives (“Voyeur Dorm”). [BRUNKER, M., 10-9-2000]
 
If Mark Kreloff of Colorado-based New Frontier Media is Jewish too (his Executive Vice President, in any case, is Michael Weiner) [ACCOLA, J., 5-21-2000, p. 1G] as many as seven of the NBC’s ten star Internet pornographers may be Jewish. (Mark Bruder, president of Santa Monica, California-based Cable Entertainment Distributors is also a porn supplier to New Frontier Media.) [ACCOLA, J. 5-21-2000, p. 1G] Per the 2.5% Jewish percentage of the American population, all things being equal, 7 of 225, not 7 of 10, prominent pornographers should be expected to be Jewish.

Another young Jewish Internet pornography mogul is Great Britain’s Benjamin Cohen, the 18-year old founder of JewishNet (sold for 300,000 pounds) and CEO of cyberbritain (“its subsidiaries include the pornography portal, huntforporn.co.uk, and the adult search engine, dotadults.com.”) [LEVITT, L., 1-19-01, p. 9] dotadults.com was “the UK’s first adult search engine.” Cyberbritain Executive Directors include the Jewish enclave of Gerry Defries, Benjamin Cohen, Alex Defries and Daniel Ickowitz-Seidler. Non-Executive Directors include Gary Sterns (CEO of London Jewish News Ltd), Steve Masters, David Green, and Richard Cohen. [M2 PRESSWIRE, 1-2-01]

Still another major Internet pornographic Cohen — not to be confused with Benjamin — is Stephen. This second Cohen was successfully sued for stealing the Internet URL “sex.com” from a man named Gary Kremen. Kremen had never envisioned the domain name to be a pornographic home. Cohen, after forging papers to seize the site, and developing an elaborate take over scheme, built sex.com into the premiere Internet smut base, grossing $100 million a year. As the online journal “wired.com” notes about Cohen’s history and character:

     “Cohen was convicted in 1991 for posing as a lawyer in a bankruptcy court in
     a scheme to bilk an elderly woman’s creditors out of $200,000. According to
     to court records, Cohen assumed the identity of several attorneys, forged
     phony deeds and cashiers checks, and attmpted to hide the woman’s assets …
     Cohen was sentenced to 46 months. It was his second conviction. In 1975,
     he was found guilty of grand theft and check kiting … Within eight months of
     his prison release, Cohen controlled [by fraud] the Sex.com domain name …
     By the late ’80s, Cohen had set up a real-world meeting place for French
     Connection swingers at a home in Orange County, California. Hundreds of
     couples met at ‘The Club’ on Friday and Saturday nights to swap partners.
     After neighbors complained, police arrested Cohen in 1990 on charges of
     operating a sex club in a residential zone … In January 1996, [Cohen’s
     group] unveiled its bid to buy a Nevada brothel called Sheri’s Ranch and
     transform it into a $100 million ‘adult fantasy resort.’ Named Wanaleiya,
     the Polynesian-themed resort would feature 500 exotic women who ‘would
     not hesitate to see to your comfort and pleasure.'” [BICKNELL, C., 4-13-99]

Then there is Steve Hirsch, who owns Vivid Video. “Of all its achievements,” notes Los Angeles magazine,

      “Vivid is most famous for refurbishing the appearance of the video box, wrapping
      it in the glossy-art look of a fashion advertisement that masks its raunchy contents.
      Single, Ferrari-driving Hirsch, who has built up the biggest-selling adult-film business
      in the Valley based on the idea of the old Hollywood studio system, seems equally
      ‘packaged.’ Talking to him is like interacting with a TelePrompter–his well-rehearsed
       CEO lines (“It is important for us to make quality product, work with the best models, get
       our message out”) seem scripted by drones in next room. ‘He’s very intelligent,’ says
       every competitor of Hirsch’s, yet after asking him for his thoughts, you can’t help
      wondering what Hirsch is really thinking. Unlike [non-Jewish pornographer Russ]
       Hampshire, Hirsch did not start out in fast food. In the late ’70s, his father quit a job
      as a stockbroker to create one of the first X-rated video-distribution companies in the
      [San Fernando] Valley [today, the premiere pornography production center on
       earth]. Hirsch worked in his dad’s warehouse after high school and founded
      Vivid with a partner in 1984. He was 23 years old. Today, Hirsch’s father
      works in Vivid‘s sales division, his sister Marci heads production, and Hirsch–who
      is known for aggressively entering and dominating new markets–sits poised to conquer
      the new DVD technology that could eventually replace the video format, as well as
       mainstream the adult-film industry once and for all.” [GARDETA, D., 12-98]

Then there is Steven Orenstein, head of a major porno production firm called Wicked, like many, based in Los Angeles’ San Fernando Valley (the premiere pornography production zone on the planet):

      “Like [fellow Jewish pornographer Steve] Hirsch, Orenstein was introduced
      to the business by a parent. In his case, it was his mother, a bookkeeper, who
      took a job in accounting at an adult-magazine business and then later helped her
      son secure work at the same company. (Today, she does the books at Wicked.)
      Also like Hirsch, Orenstein came up through the industry, working a series of jobs
      until he struck out on his own, forming Wicked in 1993.” [GARDETTA, D., 12-98]
     
And we dare not omit Susan Block from the long list of Jewish sex entrepreneurs. Block, a self-described “sex expert,” has an online porno site where she revels in a furious sex hustling and narcissim, herself modeling scanty outfits and apparently living out her porno portrait fantasies (caption to one photo: “Here Dr. Block is in her ‘Cyberstars’ push-up bra, thong panties and sheer robe ensemble’). And here, at this Internet version of her Dr. Susan Block Institute for the Erotic Arts and Sciences, Block lists media commentary that describes her as “America’s hottest sex therapist,” an “X-rated alternative to Leno, Letterman, and Nightline” (she has a cable TV show), and “a happily-married, religiously aware Jewish woman.” [http://www.drsusanblock.com]

In 1998, reporter Carol Lloyd described the public opening of Ms. Block’s “Sex Institute”:

     “There must be an explanation for the scene taking place just five feet away. A blond,
      large-breasted woman and a massive black man are fornicating with methodical, casual
       self-consciousness, like two body-builders pumping iron after an injury. He is on top,
      banging away unhurriedly, holding himself away from her with two knuckled fists
      planted on either side of her hips. She doesn’t touch him but fidgets with a silver
      vibrator while preening at the small live audience and the roving, carnivorous camera.
      The peanut gallery continues with its kibitzing, trying to make sense of how such
      an explicitly sexual spectacle — the climax to an evening of broken taboos — can
      be so deeply, utterly unsexy. The event seemed too good to pass up. Dr. Susan
      Block, a sex celebrity who is, among other items on a groaning résumé, an advice
      columnist, a maker of videos bearing such titles as ‘The Fine Art of Fellatio,’ the
      author of ‘The 10 Commandments of Pleasure,’ the holder of a doctorate in
      philosophy, a radio and cable access talk-show host and the cleavage-friendly
      poster child for all things sex-enlightening and self-promoting, was throwing a
      Valentine’s Day party to celebrate the opening of her new sexual institute, located
      in an old 1920s speakeasy in the heart of downtown L.A.’s art, fashion, financial
      and convention district … Max, Susan Block’s self-declared publicist, footman,
      butler, husband and sex slave, offers to show me the art … ‘We’ve got everything,’
      he says proudly, then segues into interview mode. ‘I’m the most prosecuted publisher
      in America. I’ve been prosecuted 20 times and I’ve spent 18 months in jail.’ He ticks
      off the charges on his fingers. ‘Industrial espionage, rack ordinances (I put the first
      pair of tits on the streets of L.A.), conspiracy to publish.'” [LLOYD, C., 2-18-98]

 
Yet another Jewish pornography entrepreneur of considerable notoriety, David Friedman, owned the Pussycat Theatre adult film movie house chain; in California alone there were 47 of them. [FORD, p. 26] Friedman was also a pioneer in the production of “soft-core” porn. Called the “Sultan of Sleaze” and “America’s Most Notorious Carpetbagger of Cinemadom,” between 1958 and 1984 he made 58 full-length films including the likes of Blood Feast, Ten Thousand Maniacs, and Scum of the Earth. [FRIEDMAN, D., p. 8, 10]  Scum of the Earth, notes Friedman, was “about a gang of pornographers … who lure young college girls into posing for ‘feelthy pictures.'” [FRIEDMAN, D., p. 325]  “Herschell  [Lewis] and I,” says Friedman, “had a reputation in the burgeoning exploitation film business of the early sixties. It was widely known and agreed upon that Friedman-Lewis Productions could generate more films per dollar than any other source.” [FRIEDMAN, D., p. 325] (Other associates in his genre of film world included Howard Golden, S. S. Millard, Louis Sonnery, and Irwin Joseph. Sam Katzman also had production companies for quickly created movies, 4 Leaf and Victory. So did Maurice Conn of Ambassador-Conn.)The following is what Mikita Brottman notes (complete with psychoanalytic analysis in her scholarly volume Offensive Films: Towards an Anthropology of Cinema Vomitif) about Herschell Lewis’ contribution to film. He is responsible for the introduction to popular culture of the grotesque gore movie:

     “Made for a mere $24,000 in 1963, Herschell Gordon Lewis’ infamous Blood
     Feast
is regarded — when it is regarded at all — as the absolute nadir of
     exploitation cinema. Original publicity posters, declaring the film ‘more
     grisly than ever, in blood color,’ promised its audience they would ‘Recoil
     and Shudder’ when witnessing ‘the Slaughter and Mutilation of Nubile
     Young Girls — in a weird and horrendous Ancient Rite! … Even Herschell
     Gordon Lewis has talked about the limitations of the actors’ abilities and the
     fact that the script stresses gore at the expense of plausibility and coherence —
     there is something to be said for the film’s transgression of classical
     cinema’s barriers and limitations … The film opens with an attack on a young
     girl in the bath. Ramses [the villian] pokes out her eye with a sword, then
     hacks off her legs and wraps them in newspaper. His second victim, Marcie
     (Ashlyn Maretin, Playboy Playmate of April 1964), is making love to
     to her boyfriend on the beach when she is attacked and murdered; her brain
     is removed, still quivering. A third girl (Astrid Olsen) is stalked to a motel
     where Ramses pulls her tongue out of her mouth with his bare hands … At
     the time of its first release, Blood Feast was reviewed extensively in Time,
     Newsweek and Variety, to almost universal distaste. Ever since, it has
     atttained the status of a cult classic as ‘the infamous first gore film’ and
     ‘the original splatter film’ … As for the less respectable face of horror — the slasher
     movie — the narrative foundation for this highly ritualized and formulaic tale
     are laid bare for the first time in 1963, in the story of Fuad Ramses and his
     Blood Feast … [which] stands as the ur-test for a long tradition of
     slasher and stalker film. To pick up once again on the psychoanalystic
     metaphor, Blood Feast is the ‘primal scene’ of the slasher film genre …
     Put in its simplest narrative terms, Blood Feast is the story of a blood-thirsty
     fiend, who sets about killing and mutiliating a series of sexually attractive,
     pubescent females one-by-one until only a single girl in the chain remains alive.”
     [BROTTMAN, M., 1997, p. 79-80]

And what of the personal ethical life of Mr. Lewis? He was “an ex-college professor with a Ph.D in English and the self-styled ‘Wizard of Gore,’ [who] lost most of his capital in the courts when he was arrested for his part in a fraudulent car rental agency, along with a series of other mail fraud convictions, including a fake abortion referral agency and a phony gas-saving device. The arrest brought his filmmaking career to an abrupt end.” ]BROTTMAN, M., 1997, p. 180]
     
More recently, Zalman King, “the soft-core impresario,” has produced, among other films, Female Perversions (directed by Susan Streitfield) and Striptease (directed by Andrew Bergman). [MILLAX, J., 5-23-97, p. 5] He also created the “popular erotic drama series, ‘The Red Shoe Diaries,’ for Showtime cable television. “I don’t consider this soft porn,” he told a reporter, “I would just call it erotic filmmaking.” [MENDOZA, N., 6-27-93, p. 75]

In the “B” movie genre, among the best known is Roger Corman, whose father was Jewish. Film critic Roger Ebert also notes three more Jews of prominence:
 
     “AIP’s [American International Pictures] Samuel Arkoff and James
      Nicholson and the early Joe Levine are the major 1960s figures in the
      exploitation field, but by the end of the decade … [there was also] Joe
      Solomon.” [EBERT, p. 137]
 
 Solomon’s works include Hell’s Angels on Wheels. His “top director” was also Jewish — Bruce Kessler. [EBERT, p. 138] Legendary Hollywood hustler Joseph E. Levine? He, says Steven Aronson,

     “wrote the book on promotion; famed for PR gimmicks and publicity stunts;
     owes success to low-level made-in-Rome spectacle-film Hercules, starring
     ‘Mr. Universe’ Steve Reeves.” [ARONSON, S., 1983, p. 187]

The creator of Fritz the Cat, “the world’s first X-rated cartoon?” [DIAMOND, J., 7-6-92] Also Jewish: Ralph Bakshi, born in Palestine before it became Israel. And as Jewish commentator Barbara Amiel notes about filmmaker David Cronenberg:

 
     “[His] new film Crash has hit London like an unexploded bomb …
     The story of a group of young people who get their kicks out of
     watching stunt men re-enacting car crashes or videos of famous
     car accidents (Jayne Mansfield, James Dean) has horrified the public
     … Britain is in the middle of a wave of self-righteous Puritanism and
     the notion that car crashes could sexually excite people is something
     ‘beyond depravity.'” [AMIEL, B., 11-16-96, p. B6]

Then there is British filmmaker Mike Leigh (changed from Lieberman), “dubbed Europe’s best filmmaker by an American distributor.” Leigh, who has has “12 full-length films to his name, together with dozens of theatre and television plays, plus lucrative television commercials for McDonalds,” is

     “the master of the grungy, the squalid, the sexually menacing and the sexually
     dissolute … Young Mike himself joined a Jewish youth movement, went
     to Israel and worked on a kibbutz … Leigh presents his audience with lavatories,
     excrement and urine, farting, vomiting, abortions, nudity, graffiti-infested lifts,
     cannibalism, and, in his play Babies Grow Old … your actual kitchen sink.”
      [KAUFMAN, G., 2-11 96]

In 1988 prominent Italian film director Franco Zeffirelli made Jewish news for allegedly calling the Jewish producers of the film The Last Temptation of Christ  (the film, directed by a non-Jew, Martin Scorsese, attracted widespread condemnation from conservative Christian groups) “Jewish cultural scum in Los Angeles.” Zeffirelli later denied those exact words, but still attacked the film’s producer, Lew Wasserman, Chairman of MCA, as “a merchant on the lookout for dollars, and not, certainly, of quality films that respect precise universalist values … I ask Lew Wasserman, with irony: What would he say if one day an Italian decided to make a film about Abraham sodomizing Isaac?” [GRUBER, p. 7]
 
Hollywood-based Christian activists Tim Penland and Larry Poland were hired by the Jewish head of Universal, Tom Pollock, (Universal was MCA’s subsidiary that released the movie) and they later co-authored a book about the company’s exploitation of them. Hired (without seeing the completed film) to mollify Christian lobbyist groups that were uncomfortable with The Last Temptation, Penland and Poland felt deceived and manipulated by Universal and soon joined the protest against the film. Careful not to enflame anti-Jewish sentiment, Poland nonetheless notes that “My observation is that the higher you go in the power structure of film and television, the more Jewish the industry becomes. If you don’t believe me, checkout the corporate directors of the ten biggest movie studios sometime.” [POLAND, L., 1988, p. 141]
 
The Jewish community, in so many ways influential in defining public morality (through activism in enforcing a separation between “church and state,” dominance in the upper echelons of the mass media, pre-eminence in pornography, as well as mainstream publishing, modern art, etc., as we will soon see) were the subject of a national survey in 2000. According to the Jews and the Public Square Project, researchers discovered the following percentages of support of those surveyed for the following assertions:
 
                                                      Non-Jews     Jews       Jewish “leaders”      
  Homosexuality is Wrong:                  48%           23%           7%
  Do you support “abortion rights?”     56%           88%           96%
  Do you support the displaying
     of the Ten Commandments
     in public schools?                           65%          38%
 

“Jews take a less critical view,” noted the surveys’ researchers, “of homosexuality, abortion, birth control and pornography than do Gentiles.” [PAULSON, M., 7-15-2000, p. B2] (Not surprisingly, the producers of herisque, “push the boundaries” gay sitcom for Showtime in 2000 were Daniel Lipman and Ron Cowen). According to another (1994) survey by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, Jews are also the most sexually promiscuous ethnic group in America. According to their responses, 34% of American Jews have had sex with more than 11 partners by age 18! [HALBERSTAM, p. 141] (As non-Jewish journalist Ross Wetzsteon notes: “I’ve always been attracted to Jewish women — in fact, every long relationship I’ve ever had, including my marriage, was with a Jewish woman … With WASPs, the code seemed unbreakable — first date kiss at the door, second date clumsy feel in the car, etc. etc., so you sensed your sexuality was rigidly sculpted; with Jews, on the other hand, it wasn’t a matter of ‘an easy lay’ — it was the feeling that whatever was going to happen sexually between you would happen, clumsily, perhap, but at least spontaneously.”) [WETZSTEON, R. SEPT 6-10, 1998]

Chaim Bermant explains traditional Jewish views about sex like this:

     “One could also discern in some of the anti-Jewish agitation [in early 20th
     century Christian Europe] more than a passing undertone of sexual
     jealousy. The Jew, as we have seen, was thought to be in league with the
     devil and prone to every variety of dark practice, and what could be darker
     or more devilish than sex? (The Jew, in ancient times at least, also had an
     extravagant idea of the sexual tastes and aptitudes of the gentile. The
     Talmud, for example, decreed that one shouldn’t stable one’s ass with
     a non-Jew in case it should be buggered). That the Jew had and has
     a robust sexual appetitte is well attested from even the most cursory
     readings of the Bible, the Talmud, and more recent, if less sacred,
     texts. ‘Be fruitful and multiply’ is the first commandment in the Torah
     and what was traditionally regarded amongst Christians as a sordid if
     necessary act was raised by the Rabbis to the level of a holy sacrament.
     But as the Rabbis themselves were to lament, it was carried to unholy
     lengths.” [BERMAN, C., 1977, p. 29]

A survey of Jewish Americans in 1989 also noted that “nearly one in five respondents” elicited “skeptical responses” about the existence of God, while “in the general American population, over nine out of ten affirm a belief in God.” [WERTHEIMER, J., 1993, p. 63]

The results of an earlier 1980s study about the mores of the entertainment television elite, the molders of popular culture, was published by three Jewish researchers in 1983. 104 prominent members of the Hollywood television world were formally interviewed, randomly selected from a list by Hollywood “insiders” of “key” people in the business, i.e., “Hollywood’s most influential television writers, producers and executives.” 93% of those interviewed were found to have had a “religious upbringing.” Of these, 59% were raised “in the Jewish faith.” (7% of the total survey were not raised in a religious milieu. In the context of Jewish pre-eminence in communist movements in the early and mid-20th century, [see discussions earlier] it is safe to assume that a very high percentage of these religiously unaffiliated were also Jewish). [LICHTER/LICHTER/ROTHMAN, 1983, p. 54-61]
 
75%, of the Hollywood elite categorized themselves to be to the left of center politically; only 14% to the right. 97% agreed with a statement that women “have a right to abortion,” and only 20% agreed that “homosexuality is wrong.” 51% disagreed with the statement that “adultery is wrong.” Only 17% of the Hollywood elite “strongly agreed that extramarital affairs are wrong.” 70% disagreed with the statement that “There is too much sex on television.” 72% disagreed with the statement that “TV is too critical of traditional values.”
 
Meanwhile, at the same time, in a 1982 nationwide poll, only 27% of the American public called themselves “liberal,” 32% classified themselves as “conservative.”  As the three Jewish researchers noted,
 
     “The television elite’s social liberalism is also evidenced by their views
     on sex and morality … On such issues as abortion, homosexual rights,
     and extramarital sex, their views diverge sharply from traditional values
     … Television creators emerge as upholders of the ‘new liberalism’ that
     surfaced among upper status cosmopolitan groups in the 1960s.”
     [LICHTER/LICHTER/ROTHMAN, 1983, p. 54-61]Rothman and Lichter noted Jewish influence in shaping popular culture, against the grain of dominant mores:

     “Within the intellectual and artistic communities, Jews were also
     far to the left of their non-Jewish colleagues in the 1930s and
     1950s, and far more active in supporting communist or ‘progressive’
     causes. As Jews moved into the professions, government service,
     the media, and academia, they served as a radical leaven for these
     groups and for the ever larger number of Americans coming into
     contact with them.” [ROTHMAN/LICHTER, 1982, p. 331]

Jews have also been prominent in Hollywood as communist activists, a tradition decidedly against American popular opinion. As Neal Gabler noted in 1988:
 
     “One leading communist estimated that 50 per cent of the party’s
     members were Jews during its heyday in the thirties and forties, and
     a large minority — and sometimes a majority — of the party leadership
     was Jewish. What was true of the national party was even truer in
     Hollywood, where Jews already formed a large part of the left-leaning
     artistic community.” [Ring Lardner, Jr., for example, himself a CP
     member, estimated that two-thirds of the communists in Los Angeles
     were Jewish] [GABLER, N., 1988, p. 331]

Dore Schary, prominent Hollywood mogul and national chairman of the Anti-Defamation League from 1963-69, was among those with FBI files as a “strong communist sympathizer.” As Laird Wilcox notes:

     “John Sanford, a Communist Party member and Hollywood writer who taught
     with Schary at the Progressive Educational Center in Hollywood, CA, sees Schary
     as somewhat lesss principled. When Sanford’s wife, Maggie, refused to testify
     before the House Un-American Activities Committee, Schary went after her:
     ‘Mention a few names. What does it hurt? Mention the names of people who’ve been
      named already.’ Sanford observed that Schary was ‘one of the biggest pricks in the
     business.'” [WILCOX, L., 199, p.. 63]

As Milton Plesur notes about the Senator Joe McCarthy communist “witchhunt” era:

    “In 1952, before the Senate censured McCarthy, a Gallup Poll demonstrated
     that 56 percent of Catholics and 45 percent of Protestants approved of
     McCarthy and his tactics, but that 98 percent of the Jews considered him a menace
     to the country.” [PLESUR, M., 1982, p. 135]

Noting the predominance of a “small” group of Jews in the corrosion of America’s traditional moral order and American Jewish “leadership” in this role, in 1999 politically conservative Rabbi Daniel Lappin lamented that “decent, ordinary Americans are forced to begin to question whether Jews are bad for this country. I realize how inflammatory this statement is … I do know that I am not alone in this concern … [LAPIN, D., 1999, p. 41] The spokesmen for groups like the Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Veterans of America and Lesbian Task Force are all too often Jewish. Many of the member organizations of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice are Jewish. The membership of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a champion of ultra-liberal causes, is disproportionately high in Jews. The ACLU’s leadership is almost reminiscent of a temple board meeting … [LAPIN, D., p. 279] … So many of the enthusiasts for the radical homosexual agenda, increased immorality, and expanded abortion rights are Jewish.” [LAPIN, D., 1999, p. 293]

In 1999, the Gay Financial Network announced its list of the the “most influential Gay and Lesbian Corporate Executives.” At least four of the top six ranked were Jewish, and they were all influential media moguls:

     1) Kathy Levinson, president and COO of E*Trade
     3) David Geffen, the CEO of Dreamworks
     4) Barry Diller, the CEO of USA Networks
     5) Hilary Rosen, president and CEO of the Recording Industry Association
        of America

     (Lower on the list was Stephen Friedman [vice-president of public affairs for
     MTV]; Seth Radwell, CEO of Doubleday Interactive; David Kuhn, senior VP
     and editorial director of Brill Media, and Steve Fuchs, president of Hampton
     Industries] [BAIM, T., 12-9-99]

In 2001, Publisher’s Weekly reviewed William Mann’s Behind the Screen: How Gays and Lesbians Shaped Hollywood, 1910-1968, saying:

     “Mann also covers a wide range of ancillary topics, e.g., the history and aesthetics of
        set design; the rise of Los Angeles’s ‘pansy clubs,’ and the special role of Jews (who
       were more likely than gentiles to be open about their sexuality).”
       [PUBLISHERS WEEKLY/amazon.com, 2001]

Chairman and CEO of Canada’s first and only (2002) gay television network, PrideVision? John Levy, formerly President and CEO of Cableworks, “one of the first cable systems in Canada to launch high-spped internet acces over cable.” Levy also heads The Score, a TV sports network, and “he is the majority shareholder in Headline Media Group, Inc., the company that owns PrideVision TV.” [http://pridevisiontv.com/aboutPV/decision.htm]
“Larry Kramer [also Jewish] started ACT-UP” in 1988. [DAVIS, S., 1997, p. 192]

Reviewing a recent biography about Jewish homosexual Hollywood mogul David Geffen, journalist Taki lashed out at the huge influence on public morals exerted by the largely Jewish “Velvet Mafia,” :

     “I’m not surprised to read that Hollywood is dominated by a Velvet Mafia of
      rich homosexuals who demand sexual favors in return for work in the movies. In
     fact I would have been surprised if it were the other way around. Those old
     Mittel-Europa Jews who ran Tinseltown in its heyday established the casting -couch
     practice long ago; but, as they say, at least they did it with style and with the
     opposite sex. The Operator: David Geffen Builds, Buys, and Sells the New
     Hollywood
is the title of an upcoming book by Tom King, a respected Wall
     Street Journal reporter who it seems has hit pay dirt — and it’s dirt, all right —
     with his expose of the unspeakable Geffen. Geffen invited King to write a book
     about his amazing rise to the top, and allegedly named dozens of former
     boyfriends, many of them now famous stars. Indiscretion aside, Geffen is
     is a lowlife san pareil … But what bothers me is not the bestiality and arrogance
     of the Velvet Mafiosi. It is the message they send out through their movies …
     Geffen, of course, denies there is such a thing as a homosexual cabal,
     and, typically, charges anti-Semitism. According to King’s book, [Jewish]
     friends like Barry Diller, Sandy Gallin and Calvin Klein, among many others,
     keep a low profile but apparantly indulge in the sexual bacchanals that go
     with the territory. Alleged weekend-long orgies fueled by drugs at which Geffen and
     his powerful buddies run a ‘meat market’ selecting young men for sex
     are apparently described in detail in King’s opus … Hollywood has never been
     a moral place, far from it, but until the 1960s and 70s it preached a hell of
     a moral lesson. God, the family, patriotism, even Mom were sacrosanct.
     Now it’s the exact opposite. Criminals are sympathetically portrayed, cops
     always negatively; people who think same-gender sex is wrong are fascists.”
     [TAKI, v.13, no. 10]

In Russia, Olga Zhuk (“I’m Jewish and I’m a dyke”) has led the recent Soviet out-of-the-closet homosexual movement. As London’s The Guardian noted in 1992:

      “Olga Zhuk can claim the dubious distinction of being the only woman in the
      Soviet Union ever to have been charged under Article 121 of the Penal Code –
      the law that criminalises sodomy between men. It happened in November 1990,
      after Zhuk and a handful of other lesbians and gay men from Leningrad took a
      very deep breath and attempted to register Russia’s first ever lesbian and gay
      organisation – the Tchaikovsky Foundation – with the city authorities … As president
      and perceived ‘ringleader’ behind the Tchaicovsky Foundation, Zhuk was publicly
      denounced in the Lensoviet and charged with sodomy. But the case never came
      to court, the charges dropped after radical lawyers succeeded in convincing the
      chief prosecutor that lesbians were biologically incapable of sodomising each other.”
      [MCKENNA, N., 3-31-92, p. 21]

 
Moving along in the religious sphere, in 1999, the aforementioned Rabbi Daniel Lapin, representing a very rare Jewish perspective, addressed the systematic defamation of the Christian community by major Jewish organizations, declaring that
 
      “I am appalled by the great injustice being perpetrated by those Jewish
      organizations [the Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Congress,
      World Jewish Congress, etc.] that engage in anti-Christian bigotry.
      Although many of them were founded explicitly to fight bigotry, and
      for many years did just that, today the shrill rhetoric and hate-filled
      propaganda found in their direct mail is discriminatory and divisive.
      The very same Jewish organizations would be the loudest protesters
      were anything remotely similar being said by non-Jews about Jews.”
       [LAPIN, D., 1999, p. 2]

As Yechiel Eckstein, also a rabbi, further noted in 1997:

     “Hollywood’s impact on our popular culture is profound and undeniable …
     More often than not, filmmakers seem to go out of their way to depict people
     of faith in the worst possible light. And while Jews and Judiaism are, by
     and large, portrayed favorably and reverentially, Christians, particularly
     Evangelical Protestants and devout Cathlics, do not fare so well. One is
     left with the distinct impression that Hollywood has a very real and pervasive
     anti-Christian bias. How else do we explain the fact that Christian clergy —
     when they are portrayed at all — are usually shown engaging in morally
     reprehensible behavior? Or the fact that Christian symbols are associated with
     characters who prey upon society? Or that the crimes of various antagonists are
     shown to be religiously motivated? In Primal Fear, for example, the local
     archbishop is murdered by one of the waifs he exploited in his self-made
     porn films. The lead character in Priest is shown in a homosexual tryst with a
     The sadistic nurse in Misery wears a cross; the rapist in Eye for an Eye sports
     one as well. A killer played by Harry Connick Jr. in Copycat repeatedly invokes
     the names of Jesus. Christian beliefs and symbols are often belittled by Hollywood
     producers and writers. The cherished symbols of faith are put to blasphemous uses.
     Indeed, if there is a Christian character in a film, he is usually depicted as a fool,
     a liar, a cheater, a diabolical murderer or a crazy person … Could Hollywood
     producers ridicule and malign Christians with impunity if the Christian community
     organized its own equivilant of the Anti-Defamation League?” [ECKSTEIN, Y.   
     2-14-97, p. 4] (Executive Producer of Primal Fear? Also Jewish. Howard Koch, Jr.).

Other noteworthy anti-Catholic films from Hollywood include The Runner Stumbles (1979) about a priest who falls in love with a nun and then goes to trial for her murder, Monsignor (1982) about a Catholic prelate who works with the Mafia, Agnes of God (1985) starts out with a nun giving birth to a baby and then killing it, The Penitent (1988) where the lead character joins a brutal Catholic cult, Last Rites (1988) where a priest gets involved in murder and the the criminal underground, We’re No Angels (1989) where two prison convicts escape and pretend to be priests,and The Pope Must Die (1991) which heralds everything from a Pope “harem” to illegal arms deals. Anti-Protestant movies include Crimes of Passion (1984) about a despicable skid-row evangelist, Poltergeist II (1986) features a deranged preacher, The Vision (1987) about a Christian cult that plots to take over the world, Light of Our Day (1987) about a fraudulent minister, The Handmaid’s Tale (1990) about a group of Christian fundamentalist fanatics who rise to political power in the U.S., and The Rapture (1991) where a born-again decides it’s her religious duty to murder her own child. [O’BRIEN, P.; citing MEDVED, 2000/2001, p. 290-295]
  
Mainstream Hollywood’s drastically different portrayals of Christianity and Judaism today is noted by Jewish film critic Michael Medved:

 
       “I can’t think of any film that has portrayed the Chasidic community
        [of Satmar, Bobov, and other ‘fraud and corruption’ fame we have
        met earlier] where that portrayal has been anything but affectionate…
        If you compare the treatment of the Jewish religion to the way
        Catholics and Protestants are shown … well, Jews are not treated as
        savagely … The only place where religion is treated reverentially is
        where it’s considered exotic, and that is the case with the hasids.”
        [EIKIN, p. 29]
 
“One strain of Judaism,” concur Jonathan and Judith Pearl, “has been most prominent and visible [on television] … The appeal of Hasidic Judaism to television undoubtedly lies in its exoticism.” [PEARL/PEARL p. 94]
 
      This loving treatment of Jewish Orthodoxy (“Fiddler on the Roof,” et al) is evident in modern Jewish fiction as well. “Orthodox Jewish characters and settings,” noted Paula Hyman and Deborah Moore in 1997, “now enjoy an unprecedented and variegated focus in new American Jewish fiction … The fascination with Orthodox settings extended to the mystery novels and to popular fiction as well.” [HYMAN, p. 422] “In the fall of 1985,” noted Edward Shapiro, “the New York magazine even published a lengthy three-part essay titled ‘Holy Days,’ which described in favorable terms a Hassidic sect in Brooklyn.” [SHAPIRO, Jewish, p. 167] “Orthodoxy,” noted Jack Wertheimer in 1993, “has been the beneficiary of much media coverage and has learned to exploit such coverage. Unlike earlier coverage of some Hasidic sects in the general American press, which focused on their exoticism, more recent reports have emphasized the warm communal spirit and decent values promoted by the Orthodox world.” [WERTHEIMER, J., 1993, p. 122] [See chapter 2 for an analysis of the spirit and values of this Orthodox world]
 
Robert Avrech is believed to have become Hollywood’s “first Orthodox screenwriter” in the late 1970s. By 1999, noted the Baltimore Jewish Times, “more than 30 Orthodox writers now work in the industry, particularly in television.” (David Sacks, for example, also an Orthodox Jew, is also the Executive Producer of the TV series 3rd Rock From the Sun, Michael Glouberman is the co-Executive Producer of Fox’s Malcolm in the Middle, and Etan Cohen has even written scripts for the risque MTV cartoon series Beavis and Butt-head.) [UMANSKY, El, 2-18-2000, p. 21] Real Hasidim often appear in Robert Avrech’s movies. “Although movies are taboo in the Haredi community,” noted the Times, “large Chasidic families appeared [in Avrech’s last film] as extras for the $200 per day, per person fee. [The families] promised each other they would keep their secret.” An earlier Avrech film was Body Double, which he described as “extremely wild, sexy, very violent — a cult classic.” [HIRSCH, R. 6-4-99, p. 18]
 
Even influential horror movies exploring a powerful Satan in a Christian context (particularly, Rosemary’s Baby [1968; directed by Roman Polanski, novel by Ira Levin], where the Devil inseminates the lead character, and William Freidkin’s The Exorcist (1974), where the lead character, possessed by the devil, stabs herself in the crotch with a crucifix) were Jewish creations. The National Catholic Office for Motion Pictures condemned Rosemary’s Baby, noting “the perverted use which the film made of fundamental Christian beliefs, especially surrounding the birth of Christ, and its mockery of religious persons and practices.” [LEAMING, 1981, p. 88]
 
Defamation of, and attack upon, the Christian world view is evidenced throughout the Jewish entertainment community. Gordon Davidson, also Jewish, has been the first and only artistic director (for 33 years) of the Center Theatre Group at the Mark Taper Forum in Los Angeles. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency notes Davidson’s very first directorial effort:
 
     “For the inaugural drama of the new theatrical venture, the young
     Davidson decided to stage, and direct himself, ‘The Devils,’ John
     Whiting’s tale of a libertine priest, a nun and their sexual fantasies.
     The Los Angeles Catholic Archdiocese and Davidson’s bosses
     at the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors were suitably
     outraged.” [TUGEND, T., 3-6-2000, p. 11]

(This quote, by the way, is from an article about Davidson by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency entitled “Award-Winning Theatre Director Likens His Role to That of a Rabbi”).

Peter Novick notes a similar story in 1964: a play (The Deputy) about Pope Pius XII and his alleged silence about the Holocaust:

      “Almost all Jewish organizations, particularly the Anti-Defamation League
      and the American Jewish Committee, were heavily involved in interreligious
       dialogue, whose agenda was ‘make nice’ and ‘can’t we all just get along?’ The
       Deputy was definitely not nice, not a contribution to getting along. Catholic
       spokesmen publicly and privately called on their Jewish dialogue partners to
      put pressure on the Jewish producer and director to cancel the play, or at
      least to join them in denouncing it. Implicitly they were saying that if the shoe
      was on the other foot — if what was at issue was a play sullying the reputation
      of the world’s most venerated Jewish leader — Jews wouldn’t hesitate to call
      on them.” [NOVICK, P., 1999, p. 143]

     “A former Jewish publisher, Paul Krassner, of Larry Flynt’s pornography magazine, Hustler, notes that “My main editorial regret [as publisher] was that I hadn’t been able to publish that ‘Jesus and the Adulteress’ photo spread. The nearly life-size poster which was supposed to be included as a pull-out centerfold would instead remain on my wall as a memento of those six months at Hustler. There was Jesus, a generic barbershop-calendar Jesus, looking reverently toward the sky as he covered up the prone Adulteress. Her head was bleeding from stones that had been cast upon her. And she was showing pink. Sweet, shocking, vulneable pink … Although Hustler had been accused of exploiting women, actually it was guilty of exploiting men’s addiction to pornography.” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 250] He also notes the anti-Christian theme with his friend, Jewish comedian Lenny Bruce: “And so Lenny decided to dedicate his book [How to Talk Dirty and Influence People]: ‘To all the followers of Christ and his teachings; in particular to a true Christian — Jimmy Hoffa — because he hired ex-convicts as, I assume, Christ would have.” [KRASSNER, P., 1993, p. 63]

Krassner also noted one of his first acts when he took over at Hustler:

   “I didn’t know how long I would last as publisher of Hustler, so when editor Bruce David showed me around the next morning, I began exercising power immediately. The cover of the April 1978 issue — the one that would NOT feature a woman — was scheduled to be a teddy bear wearing a negligee. I changed it to an Easter bunny nailed to a crucifix, with a basket of painted eggs toppled over in the foreground, and assigned a staff writer to write a piece on ‘The Commercialization of Easter.'” [KRASSNER, Pl., 1993, p. 234]

 
Conversely, Jewish themes in the largely Jewish entertainment world are portrayed in loving and respectful terms. In 1999, for example, rabbi Jonathan Pearl (who holds a PhD in Judaic Studies) and his wife published a volume about Hollywood’s treatment of Jewish themes and characters on television. The Pearls note that
 
     “While Jews have been known for millions as the People of the Book,
     they could also well have been called, for the past fifty years, the People
     of Television … Contrary to the commonly held inaccurate belief that
     serious Jewish issues and truly Jewish characters rarely find their way
     into popular TV shows, our intense research — over the course of fifteen
     years and many thousands of hours of viewing shows — has revealed that
     literally hundreds of television dramas and comedies have featured Jewish
     themes over the past half century …  [PEARL/PEARL, p. 1] … By the
     end of his twelve years on television, Archie Bunker, America’s best-
     known bigot, had come to raise a Jewish child in his home, befriend
     a black Jew, go into business with a Jewish patron, enroll as a
     member of Temple Beth Shalom, eulogize his close friend at a Jewish
     funeral, hosted a Sabbath dinner, participate in a bar mitzvah ceremony,
     and join a group to fight synagogue vandalism … [This show] was far
     from unusual. Since the inception of network television half a century
     ago, hundreds of popular TV shows have portrayed Jewish themes…
     In nearly every instance, the Jewish issues have been portrayed with
     respect, relative depth, affection, and good intentions … [PEARL/PEARL
     p. 5] … It follows, then, that most American television viewers, especially
     those who have little personal contact with Jews, gain a large portion
     of their ideas about Jews and Judaism from the small screen.” [PEARL/
     PEARL p. 6]
 
In 1999, an HBO feature-length movie was aired about the life of famous Jewish mobster Meyer Lansky. (Lansky’s murderous associate-gangster, Bugsy Siegel, was immortalized in not one, but three Hollywood feature films about him in 1991 alone: The Marrying Man, Mobsters, and Bugsy). Echoing the times, when Jewish martyrological legend has become history, even this vicious Jewish thug, Lansky, who headed the greatest criminal empire in American history, is portrayed as first and foremost a victim, the innocent butt of horrible Gentile anti-Semitism and ever entwined, and loyal, to the noble Jewish people. As the Jewish Telegraphic Agency notes, “The two opening scenes set the tone. The first shows the seventy-year old Lansky amid the cluttered tombstones of Jerusalem’s Mount of Olives, trying to buy a space for himself next to his grandparents’ graves. In a flashback, the seven-year old Meyer Suchowljansky [Lansky] watches in frozen horror as a pious, old Jew is butchered by Polish peasants during a pogrom in his native Grodno.”  Later, the film shows Lansky’s “muscular pal Bugsy [Siegel] defend him from Irish bullies.” [TUGEND, T. 2-22-99]  Such material begins, and frames for apologetic context, the mobster’s life of crime.
 
As explanation for this special treatment, we may look to Lester Friedman who observes that “writers of films featuring Jewish characters have, from the story idea to the final cut, historically faced a gauntlet of highly placed Jewish executives.” [FRIEDMAN, L., p. 3]  Or as Jewish film scholar Patricia Erens frames it:
 
     “Despite their small numbers in the United States, Jews have enjoyed
     an advantage unequalled by any other ethnic group in America — a
     virtual control over their own self-image on the screen.” [ERENS, P.,
     1980, p. 114]As the Jewish Bulletin noted about Jewish executive Jerry Offsay, president of programming at Showtime Networks in 2002,

     “Two or three times he has passed on a script that has portrayed Jews
     negatively. ‘I can’t stop it from being made, but I’m not going to be the person
     who brings it forth, ‘he says. In a simiar vein, he mentions a Showtime film — he
     doesn’t want the name printed — in which the director was planning to cast an
     ‘idenifiably Jewish character’ in the patently villainous role. ‘I didn’t want
     a Jewish guy playing such a virulently hateful character,’ Offsay admits.”
     [SCHLEIER, C., 5-29-98, p. 34]

Samples of Jewish-themed programs from Offsay include a play “about the way in which a Jewish family copes with the possibility of a gay child being born,” a 1943-era Warsaw uprising story, and ‘Rescuers: Stories of Courage’ “about non-Jews who risked their lives rescuing victims of the Holocaust.” [SCHLEIER, C., 5-29-98, p. 34]

 “Jewish theatre and film producers,” noted Jewish author James Jaffe in 1968, “have created the wholly mythological figure of the gentle, inoffensive, philosophical, shoulder-shrugging Jew, ready to give the hero the benefit of his wise warm-hearted advice. [Jewish film critic] Pauline Kael detects him in the kindly old pharmacist in West Side Story, and points out that his chief function is to convince the gentile world how harmless the Jew is.” [JAFFE, J., 1968, p. 62]

During World War II, despite the fact that Jews were a tiny American minority, they were amply represented as soldiers in movies: “There was the all-but-obligatory inclusion of Jews in Hollywood platoon rosters: a Feingold in Bataan, a Weinberg in Air Force, A Diamond in Pride of the Marines, a Jacobs in Objective! Burma, an Abraham in Action in the North Atlantic, and a Greenbaum in The Purple Heart.” [NOVICK, P., 1999, p. 33]

 
Hyper-sensitivity to Jewish themes has a long history in Hollywood, particularly since the World War II (Holocaust) era. Even aside from Jewish insider domination in the shaping of movies, Jews have been so protective of their portrayals in the mass media that in 1948 an umbrella group for Jewish American organizations, the National Community Relations Advisory Council, instituted, in collaboration with the major Hollywood studios, the “Motion Picture Project.” “It functioned,” notes Neal Gabler,
 
     “to give each of the major Jewish organizations a piece of Hollywood…
     [Its activities involved] reviewing scripts, cajoling producers, keeping the
     big Jewish organizations informed of any movie that might help or hurt
     the Jews … Some charged that an accusation could be made that a
     ‘Jewish group was trying to censor the industry,’ which, in fact, was
     exactly what it was trying to do.” [GABLER, N., 1988, p. 303-304]
 
But even before this self-censoring organization was created, in 1947, Hollywood carefully policed its depiction of Jews for the public. Frederic Wakeman’s novel The Huckster, for example, (based largely upon the life of MCA mogul Jules Stein) was made into a movie by MGM. Dennis McDougal notes that
 
     “In Wakeman’s novel, the newly respectable Dave Lash [the Stein
     character] was a poor Jew who clawed his way to the top by playing
     footsie with the Mob, then made up for it by giving generously to
     charities that fought anti-Semitism … In the film version, there is
     no hint that Lash, played by grandfatherly character actor Edward
     Arnold, is Jewish or that his right-hand man is the conniving, deceitful
     agent of the novel. The MGM script transformed Lash’s odious [Jewish]
     chief lieutenant into an eager Irish string bean named Freddie Callahan…
     The movie gives not hint that Arnold’s character is Jewish or that his
     early criminal conniving had anything to do with being Jewish.”
     [MCDOUGAL, 1998, p. 127-128]
 
In another such case, in 1945, Jewish screenwriter Barney Glazer struggled with Warners Brothers executive Jeff Wald (also Jewish) about a film to made called Rhapsody in Blue. Originally a play written by Jewish playwright Clifford Odets, Glazer formally objected to his superiors that the lead character (Jewish in the original version) was now Italian-American. The plan to delete the Jewishness of the character, noted Glazer, was that Warners wanted to do “a study of young genius; that for the greater part of it our hero must be portrayed as an out-and-out little sonofabitch; that the same color and sympathy can be had from say an Italian-American family portrait.” [BEHLMER, p. 266] Glazer’s complaint was to no avail: the lead character in the film appeared as Italian-American.
 
 In 1994, Newsweek noted another such Hollywood ethnic switching:
 
     “When the play ‘Other People’s Money’ was made into a movie,
     the character of a Jewish corporate raider who takes over a family
     business was changed into a generic ‘ethnic’ played by Danny
     DeVito [of Italian heritage].” [SOLOMON, J., 5-23, 94, p. 50]

One of the comedians in the British group Monty Python, Terry Gilliam, noted what happened to one character in their movie The Life of Brian:

     “We cut Otto out …[Monty Python member] Eric was very keen to cut it
      and I think it was because he was living in Hollywood and worried about
      offending ‘Jews who run Hollywood’ or because he works in Hollywood
      and half his friends are Jewish. I don’t know. I thought, ‘This is crazy. We
      made a film to offend everybody! If we’re going to offend the Christians,
      come on! We ended up cutting it out …” [HEARST NEWS MEDIA]Although Jews played a dominant role in Hollywood (and American) communism, including Soviet espionage [see earlier citations; Hollywood Jewish communist screenwriter Ring Lardner, Jr., estimated, for example, that two-thirds of the Communist Party members in Los Angeles were Jewish] [GABLER, N., 1988, p. 331], Jewish organizations were active in lobbying the largely Jewish film community to keep that depiction off the movie screens. As Peter Novick writes,

     “Jewish organizations, throughout the fifties and well into the sixties, worked on
     a variety of fronts to prevent, or at least limit, the association of Jews with
     Communism in the public mind. Thier principal co-operative venture was the
     ‘Hollywood Project,’ in which they jointly employed a West Coast representative
     who lobbied movie producers to avoid any unsympathetic reprsentations of Jews.
     A good deal of this lobbying dealt with the Jew-Communist issue. The producer
     of I Married a Communist promised to see that no Communist character had a ‘name
     that can even remotely be construed as Jewish.'” [NOVICK, P., 1999, p. 95]

Fearing the spread of anti-Jewish hostility (especially in the context of a Hitler-style fascism), Jewish organizations were also influential in policing Hollywood film content in the 1930s. Rabbi William H. Fineshriber, for example, “who became active in film industry affairs in the early 1930s on behalf of the Reform Central Conference of Amreican Rabbis,” took personal credit for convicing MGM to abandon a proposed film called It Can’t Happen Here. [HERMAN, F., MARCH 2001, p. 66] As Felicia Herman notes about this era:

     “Although the ADL [Anti-Defamation League ] and AJC [American Jewish Committee]
     occasionally corresponded on their own with film industry figures, by far the
     closest relationship between a Jewish organization and the Jews in the film
     industry existed through the LAJCC [Los Angeles Jewish Community Committee].
     Leon Lewis, the former national secretary of the ADL, had created the LAJCC
     in 1934 as an autonomous, self-appointed umbrella organization of local
     representatives of all of the major national Jewish organizations as well as local
     Jewish social and communal leaders. Many of the LAJCC’s members enjoyed
     personal and professional links to Jews in the film industry, and a week after the
     LAJCC’s founding, the organization created a Motion Picture Committee comprised
     of prominent Jewish studio executives like Irving Thalberg, Jack Warner, Joseph
     Schenck, and Harry Cohn. These men reguarly met with with Lewis to discuss film
     issues relevant to the Jewish community and to contribute funds to the LAJCC’s
     work in ferreting out local antisemites and Nazi sympathizers. Lewis thus became
     the point man for Jewish-Hollywood relations, and often at the behest of ADL and
     AJC, he utilized the connections fostered by the LAJCC’s Motion Picture Committee
     to try to shape films with Jewish content.” [HERMAN, F., MARCH 2002, p. 68]

 A planned film about Hitler, entitled Mad Dog of Europe, was eventually shelved after Jewish concern about Jewish predominance in Hollywood and how such a movie could backlash Jewish interests. “The film’s would-be producers were all Jewish,” says Herman,
     
     “and the film made particular reference to Nazi antisemitism. Upon investigating the
      project, Jewish leaders concluded that the script was ‘so fanatical’ that ‘there may be
     a very unhappy kickback from it. They therefore utilized many of the tools at their
      disposal to prevent the film from being produced. The Jewish efforts to stop Mad
     Dog of Europe
received little public attention, just as Jewish leaders desired: as much
     as they could, they kept their dealings with the motion picture industry a quiet affair,
      attempting to stave off the charge that the Jews were ‘controlling’ Hollywood.”
     [HERMAN, F., 2001, p. 69]

The Judeocentric, ardently pro-Israel Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles also plays today a significant role in censoring prospective movies with Jewish themes or characters. As Josh Spector notes:

     “Rabbi Abraham Cooper is not your typical Hollywood power broker. But a
     a thumbs down from Cooper and his colleagues at the Simon Wiesenthal
     Center recently proved enough to convince Paramount Classics to back
     away from a potential distribution deal with this year’s Sundance grand
     jury prize winner, The Believer [about a real-life Jew who became a neo-Nazi
     leader], proving just how influential special interest groups have become in the
     Hollywood machine … Parmount’s decision to consult the rabbi and his
     colleagues at the Wiesenthal Center is not unprecedented. The Los Angeles-
     based organization has been active in the entertainment industry for a number
     of years, often reviewing scripts and consulting with filmmakers and studios
     on Jewish-related productions … ‘This is a nightmare,’ [The Believer‘s
     director/writer, Henry Bean, who is Jewish] said, ‘The fear of political correctness
     is encroaching on every aspect of the artistic process.'” [SPECTOR, J.,
     2001]  

Curiously, even the old Hayes Office, the censorial organization that for decades oversaw Hollywood films, apparently maintained a double standard in its policing of ethnic defamations. As Gerald Gardner notes about the (Jewish) Marx Brothers: “The Marx Brothers seem to have been immune to charges of ethnic humor. The same censors who made Walt Disney change the feigned Jewish accent of the Wolf in The Three Little Pigs, raised no objection to Chico’s improbable Italian accent, his absurd, tight-fitting jacket and pointed hat.” [GARDNER, G., 1987, p. 115]
 
Apparently Italian-Americans have often served as Jewish-dominated Hollywood’s dumping grounds. Aside from the considerable film/television maligning of Christianity, Islam, Arabs, and other religious and ethnic genres, a 1982 report by the Commission for Social Justice noted that “television is lacking in portrayals of positive Italian American role models.” (Likewise, a 1983 TV commentator complained that “never have so many Blacks appeared on television, yet never has their image been so stereotyped.” [PEARL/PEARL p. 9-10]) In 1999, an Italian-American, Bill Dalcerro, wrote an editorial in the Los Angeles Times about the HBO-produced TV program “The Sopranos.” This series, complained Dalcerro, “not only revels in negative, cartoonish images of a specific community — Italian Americans — but was congratulated for doing so last week by a flurry of Emmy nominations from the television industry. How can this be?” [DELCERRO, B., 7-26-99, p. F3] Perhaps, one wonders, because both the show’s creator/executive producer, David Chase, and its producer, Todd Kessler, are Jewish, as well as a majority of important figures in the television industry.

Brian Viner, of theEngland’s Jewish Chronicle, notes how Judeo-centric themes in the Sopranos show can be turned to even slander Native Americans:

  “Fans of the ‘Sopranos,’ the sublime television series about the lives, love and psychotherapy sessions of New Jersey mafiosi, currently shown here on E4, will be aware that there is just one Jewish character: Hersh Rubin, trusted adviser or consiglieri to the godfather, Tony Soprano. In the latest episode, the Soprano family henchmen became aggravated by a campaign among Native Americans to besmirch the name of the genoan Christopher Columbus. But Hesh sides with the Native Americans — a Jew must always take the side of the oppressed, he said, and the Old World discoverers led by Columbus had done some terrible things, such as giving the Indians blankets deliberately infected with smallpox. Then, however, a Native American associate made the mistake of comparing Columbus with Hitler. Hesh saw red. The Holocast, as an example of evil, was way out on its own, he said. He accused the man of ‘covert anti-Semitism.’ The Native American protesting strongly, was asked to leave his house. This scene was doubtless inspired, at least partly, by the readiness of some Jews to see anti-Semitism where it manifestly does not exist, although, as the old gag goes, just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you. As for Hesh himself. I guess he was inspired by a phenomenon that some Jews prefer not to see where it manifestly does exist, the Jewish gangster. There have, in fact, been plenty of them. The notorious Jack Spot, for instance, was a powerful operator in the London underworld in the the 1950s.” [VINER, B., 11-29-2002, p. 37]

 
 In 1980, Daniel Golden noted that:
 
     “The dominant portrayal of Italians in American film is within the gangster
     genre, a cinematic heritage that stretches from Little Caesar (1931) to its
     apotheosis in both parts of The Godfather…. Indeed, much early
     anti-Italianism is merely a continuation of anti-Catholicism.” [GOLDEN,
     D., 1980, p. 77-78]
 
Golden, a Jewish author, blames such bias on “WASP America’s obsession and prejudices against ‘foreign influence.'” [GOLDEN, D., 1980, p. 75]
 
Hollywood Jewry’s stereotypes of the Irish? As Dennis Clark and William Lynch note:
 
     “For the millions, the revelations and fantasies produced by the motion
     picture industry during the twentieth century were powerful formative
     influences … The fact that Jews played such a vital and extensive role
     in the film industry had both positive and negative effects upon Irish
     participation … The Irish in the movies often were the Irish as seen
     by Jews, with the disparity and distortion that always attends one
     group’s portrayal of another. For example, Jewish families were seen
     as close and peaceful, though tense, but Irish families were usually
     seen as rude and violent.” [CLARK/LYNCH, 1980, p. 98, 103]

As Jewish comedian Milton Berle declared: “The Irish ignore anything they can’t fight or drink!” [BERLE, M., 1996, p. 303]

 
Generic Slavs? As Caroline Golab observed in 1980,
 
     “The Slavs were not, until recently, popular victims of Hollywood’s
     fascinating propensity to stereotype. Of the thousands of movies
     produced in the past sixty years, probably less than two dozen
     contain Slavic-Americans as major or minor characters. What is missing
     in quantity, however, is more than made up in quality. American film
     not only helped perfect the Slavic stereotype, but was largely
     responsible for nationalizing it … In its heyday, vaudeville made
     frequent use of the caricatured Jew, Italian, or Irishman. The Slav
     made infrequent appearances, if he made any at all. Only in the
     Yiddish theatre did he reappear again and again, usually as the poor,
     dumb, easily duped peasant … Slavs have such low social standing
     that, more often than not, they are portrayed as being one thin line
     above the blacks in the American social hierarchy.” [GOLAB,
     C., 1980, p. 135, 140]
 
An angry professor of Ukrainian descent, Lubomyr Prytulak, was motivated to create his own Internet website (Ukraine Archives) after watching an October 1994 CBS 60 Minutes report that unjustly defamed Ukraine and Ukrainians with a one-sided emphasis on that country’s alleged anti-Semitism. The program was entitled “The Ugly Face of Freedom” and Prytulak began an online project to refute 60 Minutes‘ biased view of Ukrainian history. At the time of the show’s airing, complains Prytulak, all the principals in the CBS hierarchy were Jewish, including Laurence Tisch, chairman and CEO; Eric Ober, president of CBS; Dan Hewitt, Executive Producer of 60 Minutes; Jeffrey Fagar, Producer of the “Ugly Faces of Freedom”; and Morley Safar, the host of the report. Two people interviewed in the program, defaming the Ukrainian people, Simon Wisenthal and Yaakov Bleich, were also Jewish. [PRYTULAK, UKRAINE ARCHIVE]
 
Andrew Gregorovich, also of Ukrainian descent, for thirty years the head of the Toronto library system, responded with his own outrage.” The program about Ukraine, he wrote, “is an amazing program because after Morley Safar’s first two sentences it becomes a textbook example of distortion and propaganda about the relationship of Ukrainians with Jews.” The program, the author notes, was apparently timed to coincide with “the first official visit to North America by the President of Ukraine.” Among the many outrageous inaccuracies in the CBS program, the Ukrainian word “Zhyd” (which is not pejorative and means “Jew”) is translated as “kike.” Likewise, at one point in the program Safar declares that “Thousands of Ukrainians joined the [Nazi] SS and marched off to fight for Nazism.” “This is said simultaneously,” notes Gregorovich,
 
      “with marching men who four times in the program shout ‘Slava natsiyi!’
       (Glory to the nation!) To the viewer this sounds as if it is a cheer for
       Nazism but all it reflects is the phonetical similarity of the sound of the
       Ukrainian word for nation to Nazi. The Ukrainians did not join the
       Galicia Division No. 14 (Waffen-Grenadierdivision der SS) to fight
       ‘for Hitler’ as Safer said. They were fighting against the USSR and
       the Russians in order to win independence for Ukraine.”
       [GREGOROVICH, 1994]
 
Even one of the men interviewed on 60 Minutes, Rabbi Yaakov Bleich, an American Jew, later stated that “I feel that the broadcast did not convey the true state of affairs in Ukraine. I also would like to state unequivocally that my words were quoted out of the context that they were said.” [GREGOROVICH, 1994]  Even the Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee, David Harris, felt moved to note that the 60 Minutes program about the Ukraine was “a simplistic and stereotypical image.” [KUROPAS, M., 1995] Another individual interviewed on the program, Cardinal Lubachivsky, head of the Ukrainian Catholic Church, complained that “I must also add that my office was misled as to the actual thrust of the report … Mr. Fagar [the producer] presented the piece as one about ‘post-Communist Ukraine’ … I can only deduce that the goal of the report was to present all Ukrainians as rabid anti-Semites.” A few hundred people of Ukrainian heritage demonstrated for a retraction of the program (to no avail) at CBS studios in Washington and New York. [KUROPAS, M., 1995]
 
(In 2000, there even arose a controversial Internet web site posted by people of Serbian descent, calling themselves the Serbian Defense League. This site, especially shrill in its anti-Jewish polemic, holds the Jewish community guilty of injustices against, and defamations of, the Serbian community). [ONLINE: COMPUSERB.com]
 
In 2000 too, an angry author of Native American descent, Olin Tezcatlipoca, noted the hypocrisy of Steven Spielberg’s loving and sacred treatment of Jewry in his films and the defamatory historical inaccuracies concerning another people in his firm’s film “Road to El Dorado”:
 
     “Steven Spielberg’s DreamWorks (the producer), and Universal
     Studios (the distributor) [owned by the Jewish Bronfman family]
     present the story of two Spaniards who stow away to the New
     World in the 16th century and wind up saving the village of El
     Dorado from a powerful priest intent on carrying out human
     sacrifices. This is a an outrage, given the reality that the Spanish
     conquerors were responsible for the genocide of 23 million of our
     people — killing 95% of our population.” [TEZCATLIPOCA, O., 4-
     10-2000, p. F3]  [One may also wonder here, of course, about the
     Jewish subtext of a priest who celebrates ritual murder].
 
As Gretchen Bataille and Charles Silet observed in 1980:
 
     “Hollywood has presented an extremely distorted picture of American
      Indian peoples. From our childhood on, Hollywood has bombarded
      us with cartoons and movies which show the Indian as the ‘bad guy’
      or, at best, a tragic anachronism from out of the past.” [BATAILLE/
      /SILET, 1980, p. 36]
 
 In a surprising corner, Hollywood’s popular depictions of Jewish women has even engendered outrage from Jewish females who feel defamed.  One 1998 study by the Zionist women’s Hadassah organization complained that in Hollywood Jewish women are commonly portrayed in the mass media as “pushy, controlling, selfish, unattractive, materialistic, high maintenance, shallow, domineering, who nag their husbands and spend all their time cooking and shopping.”  [MARKS, M., 4-23-98, p. 5] Rarely publicly spoken, the essence of this Jewish women’s outrage is merely an in-house, intra-Jewish psychological war:  Jewish males versus Jewish females. The “Jewish American Princess” and nagging Jewish mother stereotypes are, after all, Jewish creations, perpetuated by Hollywood’s Jewish male elite who should recognize either the truths or inaccuracies of the subject.
 
Ironically, despite sensitizing America to the singular righteousness of Judaism, the rampant graphic violence celebrated as entertainment by today’s television and motion picture producers has begun to pay disturbing dividends for Jewish efforts to sensitize people to the Nazi atrocities during the Holocaust. In 1994, for example, a group of 69 inner-city Oakland, California, high school students on a field trip to see Schinder’s List were evicted from the theatre for rowdy — and celebratory — behavior during the most gruesome Nazi murder scenes. [BARTOV, p. 49-50]
 
In July 1991, there was a “grand opening” of Time-Warner‘s Comedy Central cable channel, a joint venture with Viacom (also Jewish-owned — see later. Warner is also notorious for its distribution of some of the most anti-social and vicious “rap” songs in history, including a song called “Cop Killa” which evoked widespread condemnation and public protest towards the mega-corporation). The show aired at 5:45 PM, a prime time for children. Richard Clurman describes the program with disgust:
 
       “[The] narrator-host on the roof of an office building screamed: ‘The
       smell of urine is wafting up from the streets, and the urge to spit here
       25 stories above the city is almost unbearable.’ Then he introduced the
       piece de resistance: ‘the Love Goddess,’ a bimbo decked out in a gold
       lame evening gown, squealing “Hello pigs,” as she slipped into a ‘Love
       Harness much like the one she has next to the bed at home.’ then she
       wrapped her legs around a greased flagpole atop the building. Burly
       riggers hoisted her inch by inch up the pole, declaring her safe because,
       said one of them, ‘I always packed a safe rigging. I have a condemn on
       right now.’ For safety, the riggers, the host assures us, are all “wearing
       condoms.” As the Love Goddess slowly slithers up the pole she trilled,
       ‘Oh, honey, this feels good, baby. I’m glad you greased up this pole.
        This makes me hot, makes my hormones dance. This is more satisfying
        than being serviced by Big Foot. Oh, look, I see a woman breast-
       feeding her baby. Oh no, that’s Cher with her new boyfriend. I’m ready
       to go husband hunting. I like my men hot, packed and unloading
       everything,” she screamed. ‘If you want to get off, I had multiples.’
       Narrator: ‘We can see up your dress and that’s pretty frightening too.’
       Cut to promo for another feature: A wild-eyed comic, after some talk
       about diarrhea, describes what this show is, opening the stalls of
       public restrooms,’ and surprising people.” [CLURMAN, p. 323-324]
 
In 1995, Delores Tucker of the National Political Congress of Black Women attended a Time-Warner stockholders meeting to read to executives, face to face, the misogynist lyrics of one of the company’s bands (Nine Inch Nails). In 1997 a 14 year-old boy in Kentucky murdered three classmates “after a prayer meeting.” He told police that “he had seen it done before in a movie [The Basketball Diaries] that featured a teenager dreaming about gunning down students at a Catholic high school.” The Associated Press called the company (New Line Cinema, owned by Jewish mogul Ronald Perlman) that made the movie, but Steve Elzer, vice president of publicity for the firm, refused comment. [BRIDIS, 12-5-97]
 
In 1999, Dylan Klebold (whose mother is Jewish) soared to notorious fame when he was involved in the murder of 12 fellow students and a teacher at Columbine High School in Colorado. There were mixed reports about his background, but he participated in a Passover seder the month before the atrocity. “Some people in the Jewish community,” said a Jewish official at Klebold’s mother’s home town, “have a sense of disquiet because of the news media playing up the irony of somebody who has a Jewish heritage in their family being involved in an incident of such tragic overtones on Hitler’s birthday.” [DICKTER, A., 4-30-99, p. 18]
 
In the publishing world, by 1977 this is the ethic that Michael Korda, a popular author of Jewish heritage, and for thirty years the editor-in-chief at Simon and Schuster, heralded as a growing trend for popular American culture in his own book, Success!, reflecting both the worst of Old World Talmudic ethics and the absolute stereotype of a Jewish Shylock:
 
       “Before you read any further, stop and tell yourself:
         * It’s O.K. to be greedy.
         * It’s O.K. to be ambitious.
         * It’s O.K. to look out for Number One.
         * It’s O.K. to have a good time.
         * It’s O.K. to be Machiavellian (if you can get away with it).
         * It’s O.K. to recognize that honesty is not always the best policy
            (provided you don’t go around saying it).
         * It’s O.K. to be a winner.
         * It’s always O.K. to be rich.” [original author’s emphasis; KORDA,
            p. 4]

(Korda is from a very wealthy mass media family. His uncle, Alexander Korda, was “one of the most legendary and flamboyant of all film tycoons” who “brought to stardom” Sir Laurence Olivier, Charles Laughton, Marlene Dietrich, and Vivien Leigh, among others. [KORDA, M., 1979, dustjacket]

 
By 1998, Studios USA (chairman: Greg Meidel), a division of the USA Network (chairman: Barry Diller), both Jewish-directed and both Jewish-owned by MCA and the Bronfman family, bowed to public demands to morally civilize its Jerry Springer “talk show,” a program that regularly featured “chair-throwing brawls” and which was “a target for politicians, religious groups, and television executives offended by its fights, coarse language, and nudity.” [BRAXTON, G, p. F2]  The Dallas Morning News described Springer (the son of German-Jewish Jews who escaped the Holocaust) as “a bottom feeder whose syndicated talk show epitomizes the worse television has to offer … He once apologized for writing checks to prostitutes while serving as the married mayor [1977-81] of Cincinnati.” [BARK, p. 41A] In 1998 Springer, the “Sultan of Sleaze,” reportedly paid $600,000 to ensure that a secret film of him “romping with a 21-year-old porn star while her stepmother looked on” wouldn’t publicly surface. [COREY/WITHERIDGE, 11-2-98] (Bruce Dubrow, also of Jewish heritage, the Springer show’s Executive Producer, “created and launched both the ‘Sally Jessy Raphael Show’ and ‘The Jerry Springer Show.” [STARR, M., 1-4-99, p. 74] He later became Executive producer of the Joy Browne show. Talk show host Rikki Lake is Jewish too. Sally Jessy Raphael’s father was also Jewish.) [JEWHOO, 2000]
 
A kindred spirit is TV personality Geraldo Rivera (son of a Puerto Rican father and Jewish mother). The Washington Post noted that Rivera was “the man who … spent much of the 80s and 90s getting rich off his trashy daytime talk show, to which he lured teen satanists and mother-daughter prostitutes, while he brawled with skinheads who broke his nose and had fat from his buttocks implanted surgically in his forehead.” [GROVE, p. C1]
 
Yet another Jewish TV talk show host was blasted in the Washington Post. “The most vulgar show I’ve seen,” wrote Patricia Priest, “was a recent ‘Maury Povich’ episode. The program featured an unbelievably crude discussion of women’s breasts.” [PRIEST, p. C1]  Executive Producer of the Maury Povich show? Amy Rosenblum, a former producer at the Sally Jesse Raphael Show. Earlier in his career, Povich did television news; moving from Chicago to CBS in Los Angeles, Dick Goldberg was his news show ‘s producer. Alfred Geller is Povich’s agent. [POVICH, M. 1991, p. 131, 207] And Povich’s father, he notes, “was the respected, not to mention all-powerful, sports editor and columnist for the Washington Post.” [POVICH, M., 1991, p. 46]

Executive Producer of the Howie Mandel show? Diane Rappaport. And further behind many of such shows is “one of television’s foremost specialists on syndication launches,” Bonnie Kaplan, who has promoted a variety of talk show formats, including the Geraldo Rivera, Jenny Jones, Ophra Winfrey, and Joan Rivers shows, among others. [FEDER, p. 49]

A 2001 column by Michael Kelly in the Washington Post noted the influence of Jeff Zucker upon popular culture:

     “Mr. Zucker is the very role model for us. He is the president of NBC Entertainment.
     As such, he is responsible for ‘Fear Factor,’ NBC’s ‘reality show’ in which
     people who are desperate enough for money are induced to risk bodily harm
      and endure national humiliation. Contestants on ‘Fear Factor’ have allowed hundreds
     of rats to swarm over their bodies and have been chased, in protective clothing,
     by attack dogs. Mr. Zucker mocks those who find something wrong with this.
     ‘We’re having fun, we’re having a great summer,’ he told reporters this week.
     ‘Get a life.'” [KELLY, M., 7-25-01]

Yet neither the likes of Singer or Rivera or Zucker can compare to the level of decadence reached on a television talk show in Israel. In 1995 Haim Kreissel wrote with alarm in the Jerusalem Post:
 
     “On January 9, the TV talk show Popoliticia featured a discussion on
     snuff movies [films that depict people actually tortured and killed for
     later viewing pleasure] …  The tragic result of all the publicity will be an
     increased demand for such movies. Far worse, some Israelis may feel the
     need to produce them themselves … Two well known Israeli
     philosophers, Adi Tzemah and Yosef Agrassi, were invited to the
     program … To summarize the philosophers’ positions, morality and
     esthetics are two disparate areas, and never the twain shall meet. While
     both philosophers condemned those who made snuff movies, both saw
     a possible esthetic value in these movies. They appeared to be
     recommending that we judge them on aesthetic grounds, much as
     people used to watch gladiator shows. Woe to the society whose wise
     men think along such lines.” [KREISSEL, p. 6]